Theology Online | Christian Forums & More

  
Active Threads
Social Groups
Go Back   Theology Online | Christian Forums & More > Politics, Religion, And The Rest > Politics
Reload this Page CFI Atheist "attack" Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels
Politics Current Events, Abortion, homosexuality, gun control, public schools, welfare, taxes, government etc.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  (#1) Old
chatmaggot chatmaggot is offline
TOL Subscriber
 chatmaggot's Avatar

 



Reputation:
chatmaggot is well respected by his peers
chatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peers
CFI Atheist "attack" Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels - January 19th, 2010, 08:34 AM

The "free"-thinking organization Center For Inquiry (CFI) have recently been sending out emails and letters against Indiana governor Mitch Daniels because of remarks he said in an interview.

The supposed remarks are as follows:

Quote:
Our country was founded--this is just an historic fact; some people today may resist this notion but it is absolutely true--it was founded by people of faith. It was founded on principles of faith. The whole idea of equality of men and women [and] of the races all springs from the notion that we're all children of a just God. It is very important to at least my notion of what America's about and should be about and I hope it's reflected most of the time in the choices that we make personally.

...People who reject the idea of a God -who think that we're just accidental protoplasm- have always been with us. What bothers me is the implications -which not all such folks have thought through- because really, if we are just accidental, if this life is all there is, if there is no eternal standard of right and wrong, then all that matters is power. And atheism leads to brutality. All the horrific crimes of the last century were committed by atheists -Stalin and Hitler and Mao and so forth- because it flows very naturally from an idea that there is no judgment and there is nothing other than the brief time we spend on this Earth.

Everyone's certainly entitled in our country to equal treatment regardless of their opinion. But yes, I think that folks who believe they've come to that opinion ought to think very carefully, first of all, about how different it is from the American tradition; how it leads to a very different set of outcomes in the real world.
CFI is upset that Mitch received an award from the Anti Defamation League and now they see him engaging in "atheist bashing".

They are also upset because Mitch Daniels at a luncheon for "faith leaders" in Indiana...

Quote:
The choir from an Indianapolis Charter school (chartered by the Mayor--one teacher told me) sang religious songs.
Source





fidelis usque ad mortem
   
Reply With Quote
  (#2) Old
Granite Granite is offline
Resident Gadfly
 Granite's Avatar

 


Reputation:
Granite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peers
Granite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peers
January 19th, 2010, 09:52 AM

Daniels's remarks are pretty standard issue evangelical boilerplate.





Theocrats are Social Darwinists.



Christianity has nothing applicable, appropriate, or worthwhile to offer the 21st century.


He isn't there, which is why he's silent.
   
Reply With Quote
  (#3) Old
chatmaggot chatmaggot is offline
TOL Subscriber
 chatmaggot's Avatar

 



Reputation:
chatmaggot is well respected by his peers
chatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peers
January 19th, 2010, 11:06 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Granite View Post
Daniels's remarks are pretty standard issue evangelical boilerplate.
Do you think they are worthy of being considered defamatory against atheist?





fidelis usque ad mortem
   
Reply With Quote
  (#4) Old
Granite Granite is offline
Resident Gadfly
 Granite's Avatar

 


Reputation:
Granite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peers
Granite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peers
January 19th, 2010, 11:09 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by chatmaggot View Post
Do you think they are worthy of being considered defamatory against atheist?
Nope. They're bland and half-accurate but they're certainly not defamatory.





Theocrats are Social Darwinists.



Christianity has nothing applicable, appropriate, or worthwhile to offer the 21st century.


He isn't there, which is why he's silent.
   
Reply With Quote
  (#5) Old
Rusha Rusha is online now
Humpty Dumpty was pushed ...
 Rusha's Avatar

 



Reputation:
Rusha is well respected by his peersRusha is well respected by his peersRusha is well respected by his peers
Rusha is well respected by his peersRusha is well respected by his peersRusha is well respected by his peersRusha is well respected by his peersRusha is well respected by his peersRusha is well respected by his peersRusha is well respected by his peersRusha is well respected by his peersRusha is well respected by his peersRusha is well respected by his peersRusha is well respected by his peersRusha is well respected by his peersRusha is well respected by his peersRusha is well respected by his peersRusha is well respected by his peers
January 19th, 2010, 11:12 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by chatmaggot View Post
Do you think they are worthy of being considered defamatory against atheist?
Not to the level of making an issue out of it. Bottomline, I couldn't care less about some idiotic generalizations regarding Atheists or others nonbelievers made by a religious politician.

I treat it the same way I do junk mail ... it's delete it for the garbage it is.



   
Reply With Quote
  (#6) Old
rexlunae rexlunae is offline
Over 4000 post club
 rexlunae's Avatar

 

Reputation:
rexlunae is well respected by his peers
rexlunae is well respected by his peersrexlunae is well respected by his peersrexlunae is well respected by his peersrexlunae is well respected by his peersrexlunae is well respected by his peersrexlunae is well respected by his peersrexlunae is well respected by his peersrexlunae is well respected by his peersrexlunae is well respected by his peersrexlunae is well respected by his peersrexlunae is well respected by his peersrexlunae is well respected by his peers
January 19th, 2010, 02:02 PM

I think comparing atheists to Stalin, Hitler and Mao as he did is defamatory, and that the overall comments were stupid, canned, and deserve ridicule. And I think that the CFI is pretty much in the right making an issue of it.





Eternal life is an easy promise to make and a hard one to fulfill.
   
Reply With Quote
  (#7) Old
chatmaggot chatmaggot is offline
TOL Subscriber
 chatmaggot's Avatar

 



Reputation:
chatmaggot is well respected by his peers
chatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peerschatmaggot is well respected by his peers
January 19th, 2010, 02:41 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by rexlunae View Post
I think comparing atheists to Stalin, Hitler and Mao as he did is defamatory, and that the overall comments were stupid, canned, and deserve ridicule. And I think that the CFI is pretty much in the right making an issue of it.
Do you think that Stalin, Hitler, and Mao were being consistent with their beliefs (assuming that they were actually atheistic-humanistic-evolutionist as so many claim them to be)?





fidelis usque ad mortem
   
Reply With Quote
  (#8) Old
Granite Granite is offline
Resident Gadfly
 Granite's Avatar

 


Reputation:
Granite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peers
Granite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peers
January 19th, 2010, 03:01 PM

They were consistent as authoritarians and statists.





Theocrats are Social Darwinists.



Christianity has nothing applicable, appropriate, or worthwhile to offer the 21st century.


He isn't there, which is why he's silent.
   
Reply With Quote
  (#9) Old
WillowSage WillowSage is offline
Journeyman
 WillowSage's Avatar

 

Reputation:
WillowSage is making a name for themselvesWillowSage is making a name for themselvesWillowSage is making a name for themselvesWillowSage is making a name for themselvesWillowSage is making a name for themselvesWillowSage is making a name for themselvesWillowSage is making a name for themselves
January 20th, 2010, 09:37 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Granite View Post
They were consistent as authoritarians and statists.
QFT.

As for the OP, I personally do not care. In my eyes, he's not important and thus his words mean nothing to me.



   
Reply With Quote
  (#10) Old
kmoney kmoney is offline
I'm not a player, I just crush a lot
 kmoney's Avatar

 



Reputation:
kmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peers
kmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peers
January 19th, 2010, 03:16 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by chatmaggot View Post
The "free"-thinking organization Center For Inquiry (CFI) have recently been sending out emails and letters against Indiana governor Mitch Daniels because of remarks he said in an interview.

The supposed remarks are as follows:



CFI is upset that Mitch received an award from the Anti Defamation League and now they see him engaging in "atheist bashing".

They are also upset because Mitch Daniels at a luncheon for "faith leaders" in Indiana...



Source
What a bunch of s.

Uh oh, I wonder if I just defamed them too.





Slow dancing in a burning room.

Don't tase me, bro!!
   
Reply With Quote
  (#11) Old
Gerald Gerald is offline
Resident Fiend
 Gerald's Avatar

 

Reputation:
Gerald is well respected by his peersGerald is well respected by his peersGerald is well respected by his peersGerald is well respected by his peersGerald is well respected by his peersGerald is well respected by his peersGerald is well respected by his peersGerald is well respected by his peersGerald is well respected by his peersGerald is well respected by his peersGerald is well respected by his peersGerald is well respected by his peersGerald is well respected by his peersGerald is well respected by his peers
January 19th, 2010, 06:10 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by kmoney View Post
What a bunch of s.

Uh oh, I wonder if I just defamed them too.
No. It would be defamation to claim (for example) that atheists eat babies or don't pay their taxes.





"If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker that came along would destroy civilization."

--Weinberg's Second Law
   
Reply With Quote
  (#12) Old
The Berean The Berean is offline
Let's see Lucy pull away that football now.
 The Berean's Avatar

 

Reputation:
The Berean is well respected by his peersThe Berean is well respected by his peersThe Berean is well respected by his peers
The Berean is well respected by his peersThe Berean is well respected by his peersThe Berean is well respected by his peersThe Berean is well respected by his peersThe Berean is well respected by his peersThe Berean is well respected by his peersThe Berean is well respected by his peersThe Berean is well respected by his peersThe Berean is well respected by his peers
January 19th, 2010, 06:22 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerald View Post
No. It would be defamation to claim (for example) that atheists eat babies or don't pay their taxes.
Gerald,

Would it defame you to say that I think you are one of the most kind-hearted persons I've ever met on the Internet.





Your problem is not technology. The problem is YOU. You lack the will to change...You treat this planet as you treat each other. - Klaatu

What are you talking about? There is no such thing as the "Mafia"......it doesn't exist. Just a bunch of lies told to defame honest hardworking Italians like myself. - TomO

I will do you, let's see, goofy, wacky, and to the left side of the bell curve
. -Ktoyou

I'm white. I'm not black. I can't convert to being black. It doesn't matter how much I want to become black. I could listen to rap and date fat white women all day; for all that, I'll still remain white.- Traditio
   
Reply With Quote
  (#13) Old
yokefellow yokefellow is offline
Journeyman
 yokefellow's Avatar

 

Reputation:
yokefellow has been getting noticedyokefellow has been getting noticedyokefellow has been getting noticedyokefellow has been getting noticedyokefellow has been getting noticedyokefellow has been getting noticed
January 20th, 2010, 10:28 AM

What bothers me is that it seems that whenever someone respectfully speaks his/her opinion and disagrees with another they are automatically "bashing" the other person. If Daniels (or anyone else) wanted to bash someone, I'm sure he could've used more choice words. Or they probably could've copied some of the responses I've seen here on TOL.

Let's turn the tables and pretend that he had been talking about Christians instead of atheists in his response. As a Christian, I would strongly disagree with his statement, but I would not consider him to be "bashing" my beliefs.

Daniels is a politician; and just like any other, if you don't like them, don't vote for them. Ironically, the author of the blog post says she voted for Daniels in 2008.



   
Reply With Quote
  (#14) Old
rexlunae rexlunae is offline
Over 4000 post club
 rexlunae's Avatar

 

Reputation:
rexlunae is well respected by his peers
rexlunae is well respected by his peersrexlunae is well respected by his peersrexlunae is well respected by his peersrexlunae is well respected by his peersrexlunae is well respected by his peersrexlunae is well respected by his peersrexlunae is well respected by his peersrexlunae is well respected by his peersrexlunae is well respected by his peersrexlunae is well respected by his peersrexlunae is well respected by his peersrexlunae is well respected by his peers
January 20th, 2010, 11:12 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by yokefellow View Post
What bothers me is that it seems that whenever someone respectfully speaks his/her opinion and disagrees with another they are automatically "bashing" the other person.
You don't see it as "bashing" to compare, without basis, an entire group of people to Hitler, Stalin, and Mao? Would you feel that it was '"bashing" if a non-Christian said that all Christians are just basically KKK members?

Quote:
Originally Posted by yokefellow View Post
If Daniels (or anyone else) wanted to bash someone, I'm sure he could've used more choice words.
Not in the company he was keeping at the moment.

Quote:
Originally Posted by yokefellow View Post
Let's turn the tables and pretend that he had been talking about Christians instead of atheists in his response. As a Christian, I would strongly disagree with his statement, but I would not consider him to be "bashing" my beliefs.
Fine. Just take that sheet off your head and we can talk.

Quote:
Originally Posted by yokefellow View Post
Daniels is a politician; and just like any other, if you don't like them, don't vote for them. Ironically, the author of the blog post says she voted for Daniels in 2008.
Seems like that's exactly what the CFI is trying to do.





Eternal life is an easy promise to make and a hard one to fulfill.
   
Reply With Quote
  (#15) Old
yokefellow yokefellow is offline
Journeyman
 yokefellow's Avatar

 

Reputation:
yokefellow has been getting noticedyokefellow has been getting noticedyokefellow has been getting noticedyokefellow has been getting noticedyokefellow has been getting noticedyokefellow has been getting noticed
January 20th, 2010, 12:05 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by rexlunae View Post
You don't see it as "bashing" to compare, without basis, an entire group of people to Hitler, Stalin, and Mao? Would you feel that it was '"bashing" if a non-Christian said that all Christians are just basically KKK members?
Rex, I can see that our definitions of bashing differ. I consider bashing to be name-calling, vengefulness, etc. I don't detect that in his statement. Was it unwise to allude to a connection between atheism and Hitler, Stalin, and Mao? Probably. There are a lot of so-called Christians out there that have done bad things. There are bad people in any group. I don't consider the actions of a few to represent a whole.



   
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
atheist, indiana, mitch daniels


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
Copyright ©1997-2012 TheologyOnLine

Logos Bible Study Software Up to 15% OFF FOR THEOLOGYONLINE MEMBERS! Study twice, post once.
Logos Bible Software —take your Bible study to the next level.