. . . and The RestDiscuss just about anything besides Politics and Religion! Discuss sports, pop culture, computers, videogames, welcome new members, wish someone a happy birthday. Or just chit chat!
So what do you all think of Sum1sGruj? Should he be banned? Does his wits not meet the standards of debate?
Is he., someone's grudge?
For all the Grosnicks and ACW's out there, some seem to laboring under the delusion that their ideologies are unmatched simply by the sheer number of minds that wish them to be accurate.
I do not lament at the absences of such ideologies spamming threads. I am however taken aback by the lack of intuitive application. It is written: Thou hast no idea because thou art ignorant.
Actually, that's not written anywhere. I just made that up.
Where is the humility., no, better yet- where is the accuracy? I see a lot of emotionally driven detail and no rational paradigm to accompany them. If one does not like what a poster presents, sound reason goes a whole lot further then emotionally driven bias. Instead of whining about banning someone, bring a band of logic and play some tunes.
Slogan/motto:
The sky is always up, it is never down!!
Reputation:
February 20th, 2012, 04:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sum1sGruj
So what do you all think of Sum1sGruj? Should he be banned? Does his wits not meet the standards of debate?
Is he., someone's grudge?
For all the Grosnicks and ACW's out there, some seem to laboring under the delusion that their ideologies are unmatched simply by the sheer number of minds that wish them to be accurate.
I do not lament at the absences of such ideologies spamming threads. I am however taken aback by the lack of intuitive application. It is written: Thou hast no idea because thou art ignorant.
Actually, that's not written anywhere. I just made that up.
Where is the humility., no, better yet- where is the accuracy? I see a lot of emotionally driven detail and no rational paradigm to accompany them. If one does not like what a poster presents, sound reason goes a whole lot further then emotionally driven bias. Instead of whining about banning someone, bring a band of logic and play some tunes.
Like don't bring up your past in an argument? That kind of stuff?
Duly noted, hypocrite.
There's two points I am making:
1. If one petitions for another to be banned, don't make a thread about it, trying to boost some kind of morale. Have a sound reason and take it up with a moderator.
2. Sound reason is better then emotionally driven bias. I'm sorry if one is so guilty of it that it seems to them like I am speaking directly to said person
1. If one petitions for another to be banned, don't make a thread about it, trying to boost some kind of morale. Have a sound reason and take it up with a moderator.
This point I agree with. If someone truly bothers you that much, then avoid them. There are plenty of other threads on TOL
Quote:
2. Sound reason is better then emotionally driven bias. I'm sorry if one is so guilty of it that it seems to them like I am speaking directly to said person
Actually, I was referring to you being guilty of that exact thing.
This point I agree with. If someone truly bothers you that much, then avoid them. There are plenty of other threads on TOL
It doesn't bother me. Honestly, I find joy in bringing real issues into the light. After all, that is what evangelists do
Quote:
Actually, I was referring to you being guilty of that exact thing.
Really? Man o man o man o man., give me an example, please. I would love to here this one, especially coming from someone who has fully demonstrated and enabled others to be emotionally driven and rationally declined.
It doesn't bother me. Honestly, I find joy in bringing real issues into the light. After all, that is what evangelists do
Really? Man o man o man o man., give me an example, please. I would love to here this one, especially coming from someone who has fully demonstrated and enabled others to be emotionally driven and rationally declined.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sum1sGruj
Yeah, well what if told you that I experienced both in my upbringing? What would you say about that?
I say I am more qualified to speak on such then anyone on here.
I was making a point. Didn't sway the emotional bias that it was intended to do. It was after the fact of the irrational bandwagon you few were on. Try again.
I was making a point. Didn't sway the emotional bias that it was intended to do. It was after the fact of the irrational bandwagon you few were on. Try again.
Go ahead and justify it all you want, sum. I just find it helpful if I'm gonna, you know, point the finger at a bunch of people, to make sure I've never done any of the things I'm are accusing others of doing.
Slogan/motto:
The sky is always up, it is never down!!
Reputation:
February 20th, 2012, 05:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sum1sGruj
There's two points I am making:
1. If one petitions for another to be banned, don't make a thread about it, trying to boost some kind of morale. Have a sound reason and take it up with a moderator.
2. Sound reason is better then emotionally driven bias. I'm sorry if one is so guilty of it that it seems to them like I am speaking directly to said person
Reasonable and logical. Those who disagree with you won't like those two words "bandied" about...
Go ahead and justify it all you want, sum. I just find it helpful if I'm gonna, you know, point the finger at a bunch of people, to make sure I've never done any of the things I'm are accusing others of doing.
I've justified it plenty, you are back to your emotionally driven self again.
I've justified it plenty, you are back to your emotionally driven self again.
Where was the 'emotionally driven' response? You make things up like aCW.
The truth is, sum. I am emotionally cold to you ( a little trick I learnt years ago). You have proven to me that you are a hypocritical gossip-monger, not worth much of my time, let alone any emotional investment.
Linear Mode
