Slogan/motto:
"A day is as a thousand years" is about perspective. Two hours on the highway, to a five year old, seems like an eternity! To a 50 year old trucker, it's just the start of a good morning
Ronald Reagan played the religious right by pretending to be anti-abortion to win the election (ever the actor) but in office, supported abortion on demand.
Obama has a history of activism for the poor and middle class and Romney has a history of exploiting them:
Obama has won. The fix is in. The plantation owners control him and will make certain he wins again. Romney or Rmoney as I like to call him has no strengths. He has a multitude of weaknesses from his flip flop stances to his model health care bill to his Mormon faith and his Bain Capital rip off wealth creation gigs. He will lose. This has all been orchestrated for the enjoyment of the masses to distract them from the reality that people are starving while the 1% is doing quite well.
There is , however, one slight problem. Out of 300 million people in this country 299 million plus are not doing very well. This year may be a tipping point when the masses decide to reject both major parties.
Slogan/motto:
"A day is as a thousand years" is about perspective. Two hours on the highway, to a five year old, seems like an eternity! To a 50 year old trucker, it's just the start of a good morning
There is , however, one slight problem. Out of 300 million people in this country 299 million plus are not doing very well. This year may be a tipping point when the masses decide to reject both major parties.
define very well, because if you believe the 299 million of 300 million are starving, then youve got your head in the sand.
we have only two choices
and
we have to vote for the best one
and
you are not reasonable
if
you do not see that
story of Josef Stalin where he took a chicken,pulled out its feathers, then tossed the bleeding injured chicken away.He then offered some bread crumbs to this chicken,which returned to Josef and ate.
You Chyrs, are that bleeding and wounded chicken if you think your only option is to continue to vote for one of the two parties. people of conviction will not stand for the lies and deceit of the two party con game.
just look at the judges appointed by Bush
and
those appointed by obama
This is Wayne Grudem's appeal. It has some merit but completely ignores the fact that the President does much more than appoint judges.
Imagine you get what you ultimately wish: a nation-wide ban on abortion. However, since you attained this goal by electing Republicans, we now have no money to enforce this law because we are too busy slaughtering innocent people around the globe, financing imperialism, inflating the currency, enforcing "security" (anti-privacy, TSA, massive police forces, etc.) measures.
Are you really so devoted to one proposed method of solving the abortion problem that you can't see that the inherent malignancy of the very tool you would use would work against your own stated goal?
Are you so short-sighted that you can't see the repercussions of using Republican presidents to solve one problem will not only cause even more problems, but reverse the very solution to the problem you set out to solve?
Help me understand your plan, here, because I'm not following.
This is Wayne Grudem's appeal. It has some merit but completely ignores the fact that the President does much more than appoint judges.
Imagine you get what you ultimately wish: a nation-wide ban on abortion. However, since you attained this goal by electing Republicans, we now have no money to enforce this law because we are too busy slaughtering innocent people around the globe, financing imperialism, inflating the currency, enforcing "security" (anti-privacy, TSA, massive police forces, etc.) measures.
Are you really so devoted to one proposed method of solving the abortion problem that you can't see that the inherent malignancy of the very tool you would use would work against your own stated goal?
Are you so short-sighted that you can't see the repercussions of using Republican presidents to solve one problem will not only cause even more problems, but reverse the very solution to the problem you set out to solve?
Help me understand your plan, here, because I'm not following.
yes, I do understand the implications here:
unions may suffer
teachers may have to pay part of their pension and health care costs
two guys living together may not be able to get married
there will be an increase in the drilling for oil
and
I am sure there will be other bad things happening
Linear Mode
