toldailytopic: Why do you suppose most major media outlets are so overwhelming libera
TOL Topic of the Day - Chime In!Every day we will post a new topic and we want to get your comments on that topic. The topic could be about literally anything from the vague to the specific, important or trivial. The TOL membership can take that topic and run with it!
Slogan/motto:
Never be haughty to the humble; never be humble to the haughty.
Reputation:
August 11th, 2012, 01:06 PM
[Y]ou touted an author claiming that thinking all men are endowed with the right to freedom and dignity is "racism." (and who also praised another author who claimed that blacks are spiritually and intellectually inferior)
Quote:
Ham and Ware are fine servants of the Lord.
I would think truth would be a value for "servants of the Lord."
Quote:
No rebuke for Ware? He can't do anything wrong--he's black.
It's all about race for you guys, isn't it?
Quote:
Too bad you Lefties (Eccl 10:2, Jn 10:10 ) are obsessed with so-called race.
I notice you're the one who injected race into this thread. Your denial notwithstanding, you've got some issues with it.
Do you believe that blacks come from a special (maybe less special ) monkey?
Christians know that we are made in the image (Ge 1:26,27; 1Co 11:7) and likeness of God (Ge 1:26; Jas 3:9). We believe God did what he said he did (Ge 1:1, Ge 1:26,27; 1 Co 11:7, Jas 3:9).
No, it isn't, because I also wrote (and for whatever reason you failed to include) that he compared that black professor to a "banana-eating jungle monkey".
"Denial won't do you any good. Figure out why everything seems to be about race for you..."
If you believe that blacks came from less special monkeys, then the term jungle-monkey will supposedly offend. If you believe men are made in God's image (Ge 1:26,27; 1Co 11:7) and likeness of God (Ge 1:26; Jas 3:9) as God said they are, it will not.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Barbarian
"I didn't call anyone a racist."
Glad that's settled because unless someone gives you a reason to believe that they are a racist, there is no reason to call them one.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Barbarian
"...[C]alling people "jungle-monkey" would be something a racist moron might do, but I didn't say so."
You did here. You called the officer a racist and a moron.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Barbarian
[Tell us why the term jungle-monkey supposedly offends you.] "Didn't say it did."
You called the officer a racist and a moron because you were not offended? Tell us why you were not offended then.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Barbarian
[Do you believe that blacks come from a special (maybe less special ) monkey?] "Humans don't come from monkeys."
"Homo sapiens. A primate...People are animals...God rules out the creationist doctrine...[S]ome apes are more special than others...(Barbarian)." link
Slogan/motto:
As long as people demand more government, they will get it. Government reflects the people.
Reputation:
August 12th, 2012, 10:54 AM
The News isn't there to tell you something; it's there to sell you something. Liberalism, bigger government, Nanny State, higher taxes, you name it, they are selling it. And the cost is just a teeny- tiny bit of your Freedom. The TV is populated by liars or idiots. When a man puts his hand in my pocket, I don't much care if it is a lair or an idiot who pulls out a stump. I say it is time we took a head count. Who wants free government cheese and who wants a Constitutional Republic? You can't have both. You can't have half of each. Either we all pull the wagon or we all get in the wagon.
I hate to break it to the peeps, but your chances of being killed or wounded in a terrorist incident are so close to zero that they might as well be zero. Worry far more about slipping in the tub.
You know his mind more than he knows his own mind?
That's not the question. The question isn't does he know his mind, but is he being honest about it.
Your implied criticism only begins to have legs if you presume he's telling the truth. But why don't you presume he's being honest when he uses a racist's rhetoric first, before his statements find a wider audience than he intended and the consequence for his rhetoric might be a real harm to himself? Having cross examined thousands of people caught at something that required their attempting to alter the face of it to save themselves embarrassment or consequence of a more direct sort, he's unremarkable.
Now, given there's no reasonable way to read something other than racially charged garbage in his first comparing a black professor with a "banana-eating jungle monkey" I hold to my current view. What other reasoned explanation could there be in using that comparison?