The idea is to vote your principles, from among candidates that embody those principles. The idea that only the Reps or Dems represent 'my' principles is to force me into voting for candidates which are less than ideal. We have seen a seamless transition from one political party to the next , both however, are leading the nation to a point of change dramatically different from what the ideals of Liberty and freedom could support. One fine example, under a Rep Pres., you were given the Patriot Act, under a Dem Pres., you will be given Unlimited Internment. The political machines are simply completing a puzzle each one doing their part to fill in the necessary pieces, some of us can already make out what that puzzle looks like and do not like the image.
yes you did start by telling me what I didn't mean
but
you also finished by saying what I did mean
is that clear?
It's clear that you weren't clear. What does the rest matter? In a want of clarity I gave you the more rational reading, the one that didn't assume without justification that I either couldn't recognize a difference/have a preference between the two major candidates or that recognizing a difference/having a preference between the two would for some reason necessitate my actually supporting either of them.
It's clear that you weren't clear. What does the rest matter? In a want of clarity I gave you the more rational reading, the one that didn't assume without justification that I either couldn't recognize a difference/have a preference between the two major candidates or that recognizing a difference/having a preference between the two would for some reason necessitate my actually supporting either of them.
this is why you don't listen to what they say
but
watch what they do
and
how they post is what they do
when you play the race card
that
is an example of what you do
and
you are so caught up with protecting baby killers
that
you don't even realize you are doing it
and
will use whatever it takes to accomplish your ends
this is why you don't listen to what they say
but
watch what they do
Just curious, how many times do you think you've said:
"Romney said he would appoint judges like
Scalia
Thomas
Roberts
Alito"
"There was so much handwriting on the wall that even the wall fell down"
"In the long run of history, the censor and the inquisitor have always lost. The only sure weapon against bad ideas is better ideas. The source of better ideas is wisdom. The surest path to wisdom is a liberal education." – Alfred Whitney, Essays on Education
Don't you know
That it ain't a crime
If all the squares
And the junkmen
Think you're out of line
Still don't get it then. You decided to distinguish your part from women and make sex the issue. I was illustrating the deficiency of your division. You could and should more readily distinguish between the largest of your group, white men and the rest. You could then say to the majority of minorities what you say to the women.
You made a stupid comment that merited a hard response.
Quote:
that
is an example of what you do
Call you out on an insufficiency of consideration? Absolutely.
Quote:
and
you are so caught up with protecting baby killers
I am not. But you are demonstrably desperate in this. And irrational.
Quote:
that
you don't even realize you are doing it
And you're inconsistent.
Quote:
and
will use whatever it takes to accomplish your ends
You mean unknowingly, almost accidentally then. I wonder if even you believe what you write these days...I hope so. Someone should.
looking forward to how bigbang123 spins the debate
he must be waiting for the memo
Sorry, I'm late - just got the memo
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigbang123
If truth and consistency are important to you - Obama won
If truth and consistency are not important to you - Romney won
Headlines
Instant Polls Go For Romney... Mitt Walked Back Multiple Positions... Denied His Own Tax Plan... Dodged Almost Every Point In The Right-Wing Canon'...No Mention Of 47%... Or Immigration, Bain, Libya, Offshore Accounts...