toldailytopic: Do you think TOL bans members too frequently, or not frequently enough
TOL Topic of the Day - Chime In!Every day we will post a new topic and we want to get your comments on that topic. The topic could be about literally anything from the vague to the specific, important or trivial. The TOL membership can take that topic and run with it!
Slogan/motto:
“Theist and atheist: The fight between them is as to whether God shall be called God or shall have some other name” S.B.
Reputation:
May 20th, 2012, 03:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by serpentdove
Some administrators seem too friendly with members who are antagonistic toward God's word (Hos 3:1, Ps 26:5, Jas 4:4). Do you mean name names of members that I personally would not call "friend"? I don't care to do that. I prefer to discuss issues.
I wasn't looking for you to name names, I wanted an example of the "cozying up to" or being "too friendly with".
Ah well
God is not discoverable or demonstrable by purely scientific means, unfortunately for the scientifically minded. But that really proves nothing. It simply means that the wrong instruments are being used for the job. ~John Bertram Phillips
Location: Precariously balanced on top of a mineshaft
Rep Power: 157167
Other
More left than right
Slogan/motto:
Blah, waffle, moan, grumble etc....
Reputation:
May 20th, 2012, 04:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by serpentdove
My signature is awesome!
Well, at least you're now completely open about delighting in your lies then. Just don't pretend to care about or 'lecture' about truth or integrity anymore ok? You've just shown you have no regard for either. Well done....I s'pose....
Location: Precariously balanced on top of a mineshaft
Rep Power: 157167
Other
More left than right
Slogan/motto:
Blah, waffle, moan, grumble etc....
Reputation:
May 20th, 2012, 07:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by serpentdove
"There's such a things as good grief. Just ask Charlie Brown." ~ Michael Scott, The Office
There's such a thing as proof for assertions as well. Once you get around to supplying it for your misrepresentations and implications regarding others then you'll have room to talk SD.
There's such a thing as proof for assertions as well. Once you get around to supplying it for your misrepresentations and implications regarding others then you'll have room to talk SD.
Awaiting....
(Go on, you can do it.....can't you?)
A rhetorical demand for proof...now all I need is a winged elephant and I'll have seen it.
Slogan/motto:
“Theist and atheist: The fight between them is as to whether God shall be called God or shall have some other name” S.B.
Reputation:
May 21st, 2012, 01:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by serpentdove
An example would be complimenting an antichrist (1 Jn 4:2-6).
Cite?
So, Knight should not compliment an atheist on a pro-life post, for example?
God is not discoverable or demonstrable by purely scientific means, unfortunately for the scientifically minded. But that really proves nothing. It simply means that the wrong instruments are being used for the job. ~John Bertram Phillips
Or would that be awfully...
What's new? 
~ J Vernon McGee Ro 3:23, 5:8, 6:23, 10:9, 10:13.
Citing a post would provide a name. 
Linear Mode
