Theology Online | Christian Forums & More

  
Active Threads
Social Groups
Go Back   Theology Online | Christian Forums & More > Politics, Religion, And The Rest > Religion
Reload this Page Scientists Admit Radiometric Dating is Innacurate
Religion Discuss General Theology, Religions and Denominations, God's Attributes, Predestination and Free Will, Dispensationalism, Eschatology, Philosophy, Origins, Archaeology, Science, World History and other such topics.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  (#211) Old
Stripe Stripe is online now
LIFETIME MEMBER
 Stripe's Avatar

 



Reputation:
Stripe is well respected by his peersStripe is well respected by his peersStripe is well respected by his peers
Stripe is well respected by his peersStripe is well respected by his peersStripe is well respected by his peersStripe is well respected by his peersStripe is well respected by his peersStripe is well respected by his peersStripe is well respected by his peersStripe is well respected by his peersStripe is well respected by his peersStripe is well respected by his peersStripe is well respected by his peersStripe is well respected by his peersStripe is well respected by his peersStripe is well respected by his peers
June 27th, 2012, 05:23 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by chair View Post
Which link? I haven't seen it in the one we were discussing.


Quote:
This whole theory is based on an idea that somehow hydraulic pressure during Noah's flood caused nuclear fusion, creating nuclear isotopes that make the earth look like it is much older than in fact it is. Do I have that right?
Open the link.





Where is the evidence for a global flood?
That doesn't make sense to me.
But, then again, you are very small.

"...the waters under the "expanse" were under the crust."
-Bob B.

The Joke Challenge.
   
Reply With Quote
  (#212) Old
Stripe Stripe is online now
LIFETIME MEMBER
 Stripe's Avatar

 



Reputation:
Stripe is well respected by his peersStripe is well respected by his peersStripe is well respected by his peers
Stripe is well respected by his peersStripe is well respected by his peersStripe is well respected by his peersStripe is well respected by his peersStripe is well respected by his peersStripe is well respected by his peersStripe is well respected by his peersStripe is well respected by his peersStripe is well respected by his peersStripe is well respected by his peersStripe is well respected by his peersStripe is well respected by his peersStripe is well respected by his peersStripe is well respected by his peers
June 28th, 2012, 06:51 AM

In review:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stripe View Post
...why creationists argue against the numbers returned. It's not because the methods are inaccurate, it's because the assumptions are not made explicit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stripe View Post
Radioactive elements were generated to different levels of initially occurring ratios. Some factors can increase radioactive decay rates. The well-hidden assumptions that the atheists make run contrary to these two ideas.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stripe View Post
Table 19. Evidence vs. Theories: Origin of Earth’s Radioactivity

Evidence
Hydroplate
Chemical Evolution

Experimental Support
Theory explains this item.
Theory has moderate problems with this item.

Quartz Alignment in Continental Crust
Theory explains this item.
Theory has serious problems with this item.

Radioactivity Concentrated in Continental Crust
Theory explains this item.
Theory has serious problems with this item.

Correlation of Heat Flow with Radioactivity
Theory explains this item.
Theory has moderate problems with this item.

Ocean-Floor Heat
Theory explains this item.
Theory has serious problems with this item.

Argon-40 (40Ar)
Theory explains this item.
Theory has moderate problems with this item.

Oklo Natural “Reactor”
Theory has moderate problems with this item.
Theory has serious problems with this item.

Helium-3 (3He)
Theory explains this item.
Theory has serious problems with this item.

Zircon Characteristics
Theory explains this item.
Theory has serious problems with this item.

Helium Retention in Zircons
Theory explains this item.
Theory has serious problems with this item.

Isolated Polonium Halos
Theory explains this item.
Theory has serious problems with this item.

Elliptical Halos
Theory explains this item.
Theory has serious problems with this item.

Explosive Expansion
Theory explains this item.
Theory has serious problems with this item.

Uranium-235 (235U)
Theory explains this item.
Theory has serious problems with this item.

Ratio of 235U to 238U
Theory explains this item.
Theory has serious problems with this item.

Carbon-14 (14C)
Theory explains this item.
Theory has moderate problems with this item.

Chondrules
Theory explains this item.
Theory has serious problems with this item.

Meteorites
Theory explains this item.
Theory has serious problems with this item.

Close Supernova?
Theory explains this item.
Theory has serious problems with this item.

Deuterium (2H)
Theory explains this item.
Theory has serious problems with this item.

Oxygen-18 (18O)
Theory explains this item.
Theory has moderate problems with this item.

Lineaments
Theory explains this item.
Theory has serious problems with this item.

Cold Mars
Theory explains this item.
Theory has moderate problems with this item.

Distant Chemical Elements
Theory explains this item.
Theory has moderate problems with this item.

Rising Himalayas
Theory explains this item.
Theory has moderate problems with this item.

Forming Heavy Nuclei
Theory explains this item.
Theory has moderate problems with this item.

6Li, 9Be, 10B, and 11B
Theory explains this item.
Theory has moderate problems with this item.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stripe View Post
Over the course of several months, we determined that up to 20% of the mass in the target sample underwent nuclear transmutation into a variety of elements not found in the original sample. We used X-ray spectrum microanalysis and mass-spectrometric studies to determine this. Surprisingly, the products of these explosive reactions did not exceed the background values for radiation. This went against our initial expectations, because our concept of self-organizing synthesis of nuclear structures created by a coherent shock action does not assume the production of unstable atomic nuclei. After several hundred analytical studies of measuring the post-experimental composition of our target samples, it became clear that the statistical mean curve of the abundance of chemical elements created in our experiments are close to those characteristic in the Earth’s crust. The main difference is that the concentration of heavy elements was somewhat higher in our targets, most noticeably in the element lead (Pb). In view of the enhanced stability of the double-magic nucleus 208Pb, we were not surprised by this fact.
-source.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stripe View Post
If the Hydroplate Theory is correct, then the hydroplates hammered on the subterranean chamber floor generating piezoelectric voltages that easily reached granite’s breakdown voltage.

Therefore, powerful electrical currents discharged within the crust creating bremsstrahlung radiation which produced a sea of neutrons throughout the crust.

Three possible results from this are:
  1. Electron Capture,
  2. Shock Collapse, and
  3. Z-Pinch.
Which all result in the creation of radioactive materials inside the Earth's crust.







Where is the evidence for a global flood?
That doesn't make sense to me.
But, then again, you are very small.

"...the waters under the "expanse" were under the crust."
-Bob B.

The Joke Challenge.
   
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
radioactivity, stripe


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
Copyright ©1997-2012 TheologyOnLine

Logos Bible Study Software Up to 15% OFF FOR THEOLOGYONLINE MEMBERS! Study twice, post once.
Logos Bible Software —take your Bible study to the next level.