Theology Online | Christian Forums & More

  
Active Threads
Social Groups
Go Back   Theology Online | Christian Forums & More > Politics, Religion, And The Rest > TOL Topic of the Day - Chime In!
Reload this Page toldailytopic: Are you less likely to enjoy a movie or watch it at all if one of it's
TOL Topic of the Day - Chime In! Every day we will post a new topic and we want to get your comments on that topic. The topic could be about literally anything from the vague to the specific, important or trivial. The TOL membership can take that topic and run with it!
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  (#46) Old
Granite Granite is offline
Resident Gadfly
 Granite's Avatar

 


Reputation:
Granite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peers
Granite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peers
June 22nd, 2012, 07:35 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by PureX View Post
What's the point of listening when you know you're always right?
Ahhhhhhhh. Got me there.





Theocrats are Social Darwinists.



Christianity has nothing applicable, appropriate, or worthwhile to offer the 21st century.


He isn't there, which is why he's silent.
   
Reply With Quote
  (#47) Old
aCultureWarrior aCultureWarrior is offline
LIFETIME MEMBER
 aCultureWarrior's Avatar

 

Reputation:
aCultureWarrior is well respected by his peersaCultureWarrior is well respected by his peersaCultureWarrior is well respected by his peersaCultureWarrior is well respected by his peersaCultureWarrior is well respected by his peersaCultureWarrior is well respected by his peersaCultureWarrior is well respected by his peersaCultureWarrior is well respected by his peersaCultureWarrior is well respected by his peersaCultureWarrior is well respected by his peersaCultureWarrior is well respected by his peers
June 22nd, 2012, 08:27 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by King cobra View Post
Movies are products, and like products I will boycott if a good (or bad) enough reason gets my attention. Conversely, if true repentance came to my attention...I would reconsider.

I liked October Sky but since Brokeback Mountain came out, I can’t watch anything with that Jake What’s-his-name in it.
Watching him play a lady’s man to me now would be like watching Bill Maher play an American bomber pilot...or Howard Stern playing a concerned parent of a Columbine victim...or Cecile Richards playing Tim Tebow’s mother.
Gyllenhaal.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0350453/

Call me uncultured, but I had no desire to watch "Homo's on the Range" (How was it Granite?).

He did a pretty good job in "Zodiac", a true story that is still unsolved.

Some actors are just meant to play certain roles. While I didn't see the movie "Milk", I hear that Sean Penn did a great job of portraying homosexual pedophile Harvey Milk.





"Smoking cannabis makes people more intelligent."

Dope smoker and attempted Presidential assassin Oscar Romero Ortega-Hernandez
   
Reply With Quote
  (#48) Old
Granite Granite is offline
Resident Gadfly
 Granite's Avatar

 


Reputation:
Granite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peers
Granite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peers
June 22nd, 2012, 08:41 AM

Ya know, you could take this one step further. Now I don't really care if someone criticizes this country, but what about, say, a wife beater? Or a racist? Would you feel comfortable watching their work, as either a director or actor? Where do you draw the line? How hard a line do you really want to take? If we start holding Hollywood to a Mayberry RFD litmus test we'll wind up never watching movies at all.

Is it the work, or is it the artist, that we really care about? That's the big question.





Theocrats are Social Darwinists.



Christianity has nothing applicable, appropriate, or worthwhile to offer the 21st century.


He isn't there, which is why he's silent.
   
Reply With Quote
  (#49) Old
PureX PureX is offline
TOL Subscriber
 PureX's Avatar

 

Reputation:
PureX is well respected by his peersPureX is well respected by his peersPureX is well respected by his peersPureX is well respected by his peersPureX is well respected by his peersPureX is well respected by his peersPureX is well respected by his peersPureX is well respected by his peersPureX is well respected by his peersPureX is well respected by his peersPureX is well respected by his peersPureX is well respected by his peersPureX is well respected by his peers
June 22nd, 2012, 08:54 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Granite View Post
Is it the work, or is it the artist, that we really care about? That's the big question.
It's the condemnation. Look at it this way, which is more fun, watching the movie, or judging, condemning, and 'punishing' the morally inferior with our rejection?

There are movies that I would refuse to see on moral grounds, though. But probably not because of anything the actors or producers said. It would likely because the movie itself is promoting something that I don't want to support.



   
Reply With Quote
  (#50) Old
kmoney kmoney is offline
I'm not a player, I just crush a lot
 kmoney's Avatar

 



Reputation:
kmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peers
kmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peers
June 22nd, 2012, 09:23 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by PureX View Post
It's the condemnation. Look at it this way, which is more fun, watching the movie, or judging, condemning, and 'punishing' the morally inferior with our rejection?
Watching a movie is more fun.





Slow dancing in a burning room.

Don't tase me, bro!!
   
Reply With Quote
  (#51) Old
Rusha Rusha is offline
Humpty Dumpty was pushed ...
 Rusha's Avatar

 



Reputation:
Rusha is well respected by his peersRusha is well respected by his peersRusha is well respected by his peers
Rusha is well respected by his peersRusha is well respected by his peersRusha is well respected by his peersRusha is well respected by his peersRusha is well respected by his peersRusha is well respected by his peersRusha is well respected by his peersRusha is well respected by his peersRusha is well respected by his peersRusha is well respected by his peersRusha is well respected by his peersRusha is well respected by his peersRusha is well respected by his peersRusha is well respected by his peersRusha is well respected by his peers
June 22nd, 2012, 09:38 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Granite View Post
Ya know, you could take this one step further. Now I don't really care if someone criticizes this country, but what about, say, a wife beater? Or a racist? Would you feel comfortable watching their work, as either a director or actor? Where do you draw the line? How hard a line do you really want to take? If we start holding Hollywood to a Mayberry RFD litmus test we'll wind up never watching movies at all.

Is it the work, or is it the artist, that we really care about? That's the big question.
The reasons I normally refuse to see a movie because of an actor is one of two reasons:

I don't like the person's acting ... or ...

There is something in their history that causes me to dislike them ... such as OJ Simpson, Steven Seagal, Tom Cruise, etc.

I dislike them not for their religion or views but for their history of domestic violence and (in the case of Cruise) adultery.



   
Reply With Quote
  (#52) Old
Granite Granite is offline
Resident Gadfly
 Granite's Avatar

 


Reputation:
Granite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peers
Granite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peers
June 22nd, 2012, 10:19 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by PureX View Post
It's the condemnation. Look at it this way, which is more fun, watching the movie, or judging, condemning, and 'punishing' the morally inferior with our rejection?

There are movies that I would refuse to see on moral grounds, though. But probably not because of anything the actors or producers said. It would likely because the movie itself is promoting something that I don't want to support.
Agreed; I have zero interest in torture porn, for example, Hostel and the like. I don't necessarily think the actors are lesser people for appearing (gotta pay the rent) but I don't think these films have any moral merit or artistic value whatsoever.





Theocrats are Social Darwinists.



Christianity has nothing applicable, appropriate, or worthwhile to offer the 21st century.


He isn't there, which is why he's silent.
   
Reply With Quote
  (#53) Old
Granite Granite is offline
Resident Gadfly
 Granite's Avatar

 


Reputation:
Granite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peers
Granite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peersGranite is well respected by his peers
June 22nd, 2012, 10:40 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rusha View Post
The reasons I normally refuse to see a movie because of an actor is one of two reasons:

I don't like the person's acting ... or ...

There is something in their history that causes me to dislike them ... such as OJ Simpson, Steven Seagal, Tom Cruise, etc.

I dislike them not for their religion or views but for their history of domestic violence and (in the case of Cruise) adultery.
Sure makes his abuse in the Naked Gun films seem satisfying though.





Theocrats are Social Darwinists.



Christianity has nothing applicable, appropriate, or worthwhile to offer the 21st century.


He isn't there, which is why he's silent.
   
Reply With Quote
  (#54) Old
Quincy Quincy is offline
Silver Member
 Quincy's Avatar

 

Reputation:
Quincy is well respected by his peersQuincy is well respected by his peers
Quincy is well respected by his peersQuincy is well respected by his peersQuincy is well respected by his peersQuincy is well respected by his peersQuincy is well respected by his peersQuincy is well respected by his peersQuincy is well respected by his peersQuincy is well respected by his peersQuincy is well respected by his peers
June 22nd, 2012, 10:46 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Granite View Post
Ya know, you could take this one step further. Now I don't really care if someone criticizes this country, but what about, say, a wife beater? Or a racist? Would you feel comfortable watching their work, as either a director or actor? Where do you draw the line? How hard a line do you really want to take? If we start holding Hollywood to a Mayberry RFD litmus test we'll wind up never watching movies at all.

Is it the work, or is it the artist, that we really care about? That's the big question.
I think deep down I'd probably still like a piece of art if the artist was some type of criminal. I bet most people probably think Mozart was insane and maybe he was but I still enjoy his music.





this post was brought to you by the letter Q
   
Reply With Quote
  (#55) Old
Lighthouse Lighthouse is offline
Not today
 Lighthouse's Avatar

 



Reputation:
Lighthouse is well respected by his peersLighthouse is well respected by his peersLighthouse is well respected by his peers
Lighthouse is well respected by his peersLighthouse is well respected by his peersLighthouse is well respected by his peersLighthouse is well respected by his peersLighthouse is well respected by his peersLighthouse is well respected by his peersLighthouse is well respected by his peersLighthouse is well respected by his peersLighthouse is well respected by his peersLighthouse is well respected by his peersLighthouse is well respected by his peersLighthouse is well respected by his peersLighthouse is well respected by his peersLighthouse is well respected by his peers
June 23rd, 2012, 02:51 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior View Post
Some actors are just meant to play certain roles. While I didn't see the movie "Milk", I hear that Sean Penn did a great job of portraying homosexual pedophile Harvey Milk.
Was he a pedophile, a hebephile or an ephebophile?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rusha View Post
The reasons I normally refuse to see a movie because of an actor is one of two reasons:

I don't like the person's acting ... or ...

There is something in their history that causes me to dislike them ... such as OJ Simpson, Steven Seagal, Tom Cruise, etc.

I dislike them not for their religion or views but for their history of domestic violence and (in the case of Cruise) adultery.
I know about OJ but I hadn't heard anything regarding the other two.

I don't think Seagal's that good of an actor, and the only thing I ever saw OJ in was the Naked Gun movies.





If to die isn't gain you're living in vain.

Last edited by Lighthouse; June 23rd, 2012 at 03:20 AM.
   
Reply With Quote
  (#56) Old
Tambora Tambora is offline
Let's roll!
 Tambora's Avatar

 



Reputation:
Tambora is well respected by his peersTambora is well respected by his peersTambora is well respected by his peers
Tambora is well respected by his peersTambora is well respected by his peersTambora is well respected by his peersTambora is well respected by his peersTambora is well respected by his peersTambora is well respected by his peersTambora is well respected by his peersTambora is well respected by his peersTambora is well respected by his peersTambora is well respected by his peersTambora is well respected by his peers
June 23rd, 2012, 08:18 AM


toldailytopic: Are you less likely to enjoy a movie or watch it at all if one of it's main actors is known to have said negative things about America?



No.

Since they are acting in a character role, I have watched movies that have actors in which I hate their personal political views.

I watch movies for my own entertainment; not for support or non-support of any actor in it.

Every now and then there will be an exception. Such as, I couldn't stand to look or hear Madonna at one time because it made me barf to even think of her.






   
Reply With Quote
  (#57) Old
Cleekster Cleekster is offline
Over 500 post club
 Cleekster's Avatar

 

Reputation:
Cleekster is making a name for themselvesCleekster is making a name for themselvesCleekster is making a name for themselvesCleekster is making a name for themselvesCleekster is making a name for themselvesCleekster is making a name for themselvesCleekster is making a name for themselves
June 24th, 2012, 05:29 PM

nah.....i would never give a total stranger that kind of power over my life.





Orthodoxy is just the Tyranny of the Majority, a Spiritual Despotism where accepted doctrine is Sacred, Untouchable self-evident truth no matter how absurd it may be.
   
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
Copyright ©1997-2012 TheologyOnLine

Logos Bible Study Software Up to 15% OFF FOR THEOLOGYONLINE MEMBERS! Study twice, post once.
Logos Bible Software —take your Bible study to the next level.