oh gee... and none of you saintly posters here likes $$, right?
give me a freaking break
you people who are 4 BHO are worse about the $$ thing
you want the gov to give you OTHER people's $$
that's about as low as u can get (as far as the $$ thing goes)
he knows how to deal w/ money
i will say that
BHO
he can't add
or subtract
he takes $20
from Joe Blow
and gives $400 of that $20 to Mary Smith
Can you add or subtract, do you have deductive reasoning skills? Seems you disengage from a discussion when it becomes too intellectual. Might want to take your ADD pills as another poster put it before you start bring up grown up discussions.
Rich republicans steal other peoples money as well they just do it in a craftier manner in secret industry leader meetings. Why do you think credit exists today .... so they can raise the prices of goods and services to levels at which no one could afford if consumer loans did not exist. They gamble on derivatives and then get tax payer bail outs but keep the gains if they win. Socialized losses but private upper 1% gains.
They strip intellecutal property from the USA and use that intellecutal property to build plants over seas to exploit cheap labor and we are left holding the bag, in the WW2 time frame that would be considered treason and you could be hung for it or have a lengthly jail sentence say 30-40 years.
So the republicans steal money too they just do it differently.
Sorry, this is probably way too much for your reading comprehension and deductive reasoning but hopefully I can engage some other posters.
Romney ....Rmoney? Surely people must believe he will not be about anything other than what will be in the best interests of all 300 million US citizens. Surely people will not think he is going to balance the budget on the backs of the poor and indigent?
Slogan/motto:
love others as u love yourself... and thank God you dont have to like them
Reputation:
June 1st, 2012, 03:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eeset
Romney ....Rmoney? Surely people must believe he will not be about anything other than what will be in the best interests of all 300 million US citizens. Surely people will not think he is going to balance the budget on the backs of the poor and indigent?
there are VERY few poor and indigent in the US
single mothers are cared for
vets are cared for
and i could go on and on
and i have heard homeless people say they prefer to be homeless...
ppl choose to be poor if they are poor... in the US. Yes, i know there are many unique stories... ppl fall thro society's cracks... but still...
when u look @ some parts of Africa... then u will see poverty...
i do not feel sorry fo most americans called "poor"
its just tht a lot of less rich people
want to be rich
and want to take $$ from the rich so they can be rich...
I am about as far from wealthy as one can get (in the US)
and i am not screaming for more of the rich people's $$
i say we let them have tax breaks so they can expand and hire more ppl...
instead compnaies are going overseas so they dont have to pay labor union wages and high benefits and TAXES and etc...
he who does not remember the past
is condemned to repeat it...
can't remember the past... yes, that is what this country is guilty of...
(sigh)
Let us not forget Eisenhower or Kennedy when people had hope and descent income levels. The banks were regulated and we didn't have trade deficits. Schools had discipline and parents were involved. Gas was plentiful and inexpensive and a loaf of bread was not much more than the cost of the ingredients used to make it.
and i have heard homeless people say they prefer to be homeless...
ppl choose to be poor if they are poor... in the US. Yes, i know there are many unique stories... ppl fall thro society's cracks... but still...
when u look @ some parts of Africa... then u will see poverty...
i do not feel sorry fo most americans called "poor"
its just tht a lot of less rich people
want to be rich
and want to take $$ from the rich so they can be rich...
I am about as far from wealthy as one can get (in the US)
and i am not screaming for more of the rich people's $$
i say we let them have tax breaks so they can expand and hire more ppl...
instead compnaies are going overseas so they dont have to pay labor union wages and high benefits and TAXES and etc...
the US is becoming very business UNfriendly...
and then we wonder why there aren't jobs... geez
We should not have to be buisness friendly we once controled most of the worlds intellectual property, but have since given it away. When you control intellectual property thoes using thoes patents and ideas pay out the rear.
If I controled a significant piece of intellectual property I would not be friendly to the producing company, they either pay dearly or dont produce it and if they take it to china we will kill them and blow the plant up with a cruise missle. Thats how things used to work, now we are a weak usless washed up people. If you are not the original originator of an idea or process you have no buisness making tons of money and if you are your stealing.
Slogan/motto:
Hard work never hurt anybody - but why take the chance !!!
Reputation:
June 3rd, 2012, 02:45 AM
Quote:
Mitt Romney has already blown more than $100 million fighting Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich
March 9, 2012
Based on Mitt Romney's disclosure yesterday of $7.3 million cash on hand, we now know that between his official campaign and his Super PAC, Romney has spent more than $100 million so far in the 2012 campaign. That's more than every other Republican candidate combined and is almost certainly more than President Obama has spent.
..... As you can guess, $100 million dwarfs Romney's Republican rivals. We don't know exactly how much Newt Gingrich or Rick Santorum spent through their official campaigns in February, but if you add up their January reports along with their Super PAC spending (which is up to date), all other Gingrich spending totals roughly $34 million and all other Santorum spending totals a bit more than $10 million. Based on those numbers, Gingrich's total spending is at most $40 million and Santorum's is at most $20 million. Therefore, Romney's is spending somewhere between three and ten times as much each of his rivals.
The major reason that Romney will win the 2012 Repiblican Presidential nomination is that his millionaire/billionaire supporters were able to far outspend the millionaire/billionaire supporters of his opponents, Santorum and Gingrich, from 3:1 to 10:1!
Linear Mode
