[highlife]

Originally Posted by Angel4Truth

Have you read the rules here? yes or no

I have not, is there a rule that says hattery and calling people rude names is a-ok, your simply attempting to be contrary.

I dont need to read the forum rules to know appropriate social behavior. I garuentee lighthouse does not act this way in real life unless he is a power tripping sgt in the army or civilian world. Either way most people wont want to be around someone like that in real life.

[Angel4Truth]

Originally Posted by highlife

I have not, is there a rule that says a**hattery and calling people rude names is a-ok, your simply attempting to be contrary.

I dont need to read the forum rules to know appropriate social behavior.

You are suppose to say you agree to them in order to join.

You agree to things you do not know often do you?

[highlife]

Originally Posted by Angel4Truth

You are suppose to say you agree to them in order to join.

You agree to things you do not know often do you?

things that have no real legal implications or otherwise, I generally dont. If it is legal and its more than a few pages then I will respectfully decline as the creator is purposly trying to obfuscate. Such as banking and insurance companies, I am legally forced to deal with car insurance but that it and that was a nightmare going through the policy, insurance companeis and bank lawyers were likely the reason the word obfuscate was developed.

Having giant volumes of legal jargon is intellctually dishonest and i dont subscribe to it if it has any sort of real legal implications.

Even most court documents are not that bad. Of course all the jargon is useless if they cant produce an original signature, such as for an agreement or debt.

This is not my first rodeo and I have never been caught with my pants down.

With forums like this the rules are really irrelavent, if someone in authority does not like your opinion it wont matter if you followed the rules or not. "agreeing" to forum rules is not legally binding by both sides its just bolony to hop on board to burn a few min until i have to actually attend to real buisness.

[Angel4Truth]

Originally Posted by highlife

things that have no real legal implications or otherwise, I generally dont. If it is legal and its more than a few pages then I will respectfully decline as the creator is purposly trying to obfuscate. Such as banking and insurance companies, I am legally forced to deal with car insurance but that it and that was a nightmare going through the policy, insurance companeis and bank lawyers were likely the reason the word obfuscate was developed.

Having giant volumes of legal jargon is intellctually dishonest and i dont subscribe to it if it has any sort of real legal implications.

Even most court documents are not that bad. Of course all the jargon is useless if they cant produce an original signature, such as for an agreement or debt.

This is not my first rodeo and I have never been caught with my pants down.

With forums like this the rules are really irrelavent, if someone in authority does not like your opinion it wont matter if you followed the rules or not. "agreeing" to forum rules is not legally binding by both sides its just bolony to hop on board to burn a few min until i have to actually attend to real buisness.

In other words, you threatening someone here with the rules youve never read, and who knows what the rules are, is a complete joke.

Thanks

[highlife]

Originally Posted by Angel4Truth

In other words, you threatening someone here with the rules youve never read, and who knows what the rules are, is a complete joke.

Thanks

Yea, if you think that what lighthouse says is a-ok and still claim to be christian?

[Angel4Truth]

Originally Posted by highlife

Yea, if you think that what lighthouse says is a-ok and still claim to be christian?

yes

[highlife]

Originally Posted by Angel4Truth

yes

So you think it's appropriate to out right call someone a moron. If its appropriate that means you would be ok telling your boss that if you thought it was warranted?

I would like to see that go down as you were subsequently fired. Why would a boss fire someone over that if it were totally appropriate to say.