Location: Matrix, or Indiana, what's the difference?
Rep Power: 41459
Christian
More left than right
Slogan/motto:
Being a slave to Christ is freedom, and being free from Christ is slavery (to the world).
Reputation:
March 9th, 2005, 12:27 PM
Terrorism as defined by the FBI, "the unlawful use of force against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population or any segment thereof, in the furtherance of political or social objectives". This definition includes three elements: (1) Terrorist activities are illegal and involve the use of force. (2) The actions are intended to intimidate or coerce. (3) The actions are committed in support of political or social objectives. (FEMA-SS)
So how is it that we don't fit this definition?
"As long as people believe in absurdities they will continue to commit atrocities."
"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere."
"The world embarrasses me, and I cannot dream that this watch exists and has no watchmaker."
Location: A spacious corner office overlooking the River Phlegethon
Rep Power: 50218
Atheist
More right than left
Slogan/motto:
"Do what thou wilt" shall be the hole in the floor.
Reputation:
But that trick NEVER works! -
March 9th, 2005, 12:36 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by BillyBob
Each unique terrorist country needs to be handled in a unique fashion.
You always fall back on that when I point out the terrorist nations that stand a better than even chance of handing the US its collective head in a fight.
So, if you were Large and In Charge, in what unique fashion would you handle Russia? In what unique fashion would you handle China?
"If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker that came along would destroy civilization."
Location: Matrix, or Indiana, what's the difference?
Rep Power: 41459
Christian
More left than right
Slogan/motto:
Being a slave to Christ is freedom, and being free from Christ is slavery (to the world).
Reputation:
March 9th, 2005, 12:42 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by BillyBob
Right, the wacky part is how Michael Moorepheus interprets it.
So it is to be interpreted differently depending on who we're talking about. It's ok for us or one of our allies to do those things, but if it is someone else it is terrorism?
"As long as people believe in absurdities they will continue to commit atrocities."
"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere."
"The world embarrasses me, and I cannot dream that this watch exists and has no watchmaker."
Slogan/motto:
As long as people demand more government, they will get it. Government reflects the people.
Reputation:
March 9th, 2005, 12:50 PM
:aikido:
I hate to break it to the peeps, but your chances of being killed or wounded in a terrorist incident are so close to zero that they might as well be zero. Worry far more about slipping in the tub.
Location: Matrix, or Indiana, what's the difference?
Rep Power: 41459
Christian
More left than right
Slogan/motto:
Being a slave to Christ is freedom, and being free from Christ is slavery (to the world).
Reputation:
March 9th, 2005, 12:51 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by BillyBob
The US doesn't fit your deranged description of a terrorist.
Once again, it isn't my definition, it's the FBIs. And, yes, the US does fit the definition. We, along with Israel, were the two countries who voted against a UN resolution that called for a hault to international terrorism. We couldn't vote for it because several of our actions fit the UN definition of international terrorism, which was much the same as our own definition.
"As long as people believe in absurdities they will continue to commit atrocities."
"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere."
"The world embarrasses me, and I cannot dream that this watch exists and has no watchmaker."
Slogan/motto:
As long as people demand more government, they will get it. Government reflects the people.
Reputation:
March 9th, 2005, 12:56 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by BillyBob
I certainly wouldn't invade them like we did Iraq.
Of course we wouldn't. We would stand a chance of actually getting more than most of our men killed in combat. Loss of life in Iraq is child's play compared to what would happen against these two. China and Russia.
I hate to break it to the peeps, but your chances of being killed or wounded in a terrorist incident are so close to zero that they might as well be zero. Worry far more about slipping in the tub.
Location: The greatest country man has ever known.
Rep Power: 0
Other
Right Winger
Slogan/motto:
Reputation:
March 9th, 2005, 01:02 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Michael Moorepheus
Once again, it isn't my definition, it's the FBIs. And, yes, the US does fit the definition. We, along with Israel, were the two countries who voted against a UN resolution that called for a hault to international terrorism. We couldn't vote for it because several of our actions fit the UN definition of international terrorism, which was much the same as our own definition.
Go smoke a joint and leave the defense of our country to people who are willing to defend your freedom, you friggin hippie peacenik!