Theology Online | Christian Forums & More

  
Active Threads
Social Groups
Go Back   Theology Online | Christian Forums & More > Politics, Religion, And The Rest > Religion
Reload this Page Muhammad – Legacy of a Prophet. Why we love him.
Religion Discuss General Theology, Religions and Denominations, God's Attributes, Predestination and Free Will, Dispensationalism, Eschatology, Philosophy, Origins, Archaeology, Science, World History and other such topics.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  (#61) Old
Non-Excluvistic Non-Excluvistic is offline
BANNED

 

Reputation:
Non-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselves
June 13th, 2010, 07:39 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePresbyteers View Post
That explains why the Jehovah Witness believe Jesus is Archangel Michael.

What angel told the JW's such fairy tales?

The secular world depicts the elect angels as big babies with wings or -at best- as celestial girlie men.

And the distinction between God's angels and pagan fairies decreases all the time !

None of which represents the Biblical depiction of elect angels !

Jesus likened them to warriors and army troops (Matthew 26:53).

So awesome is their mere appearance, humans tend to fall down before them (Revelation 19:10 and 22:8).

They aren't big babies, big sissies, or some kind of 'Christian fairies' !
There is a thread for the Christian disagreements on who was Jesus. Go do that on that thread.



   
Reply With Quote
  (#62) Old
Gerald Gerald is offline
Resident Fiend
 Gerald's Avatar

 

Reputation:
Gerald is well respected by his peersGerald is well respected by his peersGerald is well respected by his peersGerald is well respected by his peersGerald is well respected by his peersGerald is well respected by his peersGerald is well respected by his peersGerald is well respected by his peersGerald is well respected by his peersGerald is well respected by his peersGerald is well respected by his peersGerald is well respected by his peersGerald is well respected by his peersGerald is well respected by his peers
June 14th, 2010, 07:48 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by john w View Post
So, do you think Ali could beat Rocky?
Which "Rocky" are we talking about, Marciano or Balboa?

If Balboa, then Ali wins by default because Balboa is a fictional character.





"If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker that came along would destroy civilization."

--Weinberg's Second Law
   
Reply With Quote
  (#63) Old
bling bling is offline
Over 1000 post club

 

Reputation:
bling is well respectedbling is well respectedbling is well respectedbling is well respectedbling is well respectedbling is well respectedbling is well respectedbling is well respectedbling is well respectedbling is well respected
June 14th, 2010, 08:02 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Non-Excluvistic View Post
He did give his possessions. He supported the cause and fed people with his resources and went broke at one point doing it. It got so bad to where he refused to eat and gave his portion of the food away to his hungry followers.

Yes, he was very selfless. He was never selfish.

Did you read my post?

I quoted something about his acts towards the poor and his humility: The Prophet showed civility, humility and modesty to all,
rich or poor, old or young. He preached humbleness to his
companions and demonstrated it by his actions. The Prophet is
reported to have said: “Shall I tell you about the inhabitants of
Paradise? They are very meek and humble persons. And shall I
tell you about the inmates of Hell? They are very ignoble, uncivil
and proud persons” (Bukhari, 2671)

The Qur'an commends "those who show their affection to such as came to them for refuge and entertain no desire in their hearts for things given to the (latter), but give them preference over themselves"[34]

"None of you [truly] believes until he wishes for his brother what he wishes for himself.”[35]

"Seek for mankind that of which you are desirous for yourself, that you may be a believer; treat well as a neighbor the one who lives near you, that you may be a Muslim [one who submits to God]."[36]

"That which you want for yourself, seek for mankind.”[36]

--Muhammad (pbuh)
Muhammad seemed to have two sides and was not consistent. He did wind up with lots of money, land, wives, power and a larg home.

Why did he not call God father or shepherd?



   
Reply With Quote
  (#64) Old
Aimiel Aimiel is offline
TOL Legend
 Aimiel's Avatar

 

Reputation:
Aimiel is well respected by his peers
Aimiel is well respected by his peersAimiel is well respected by his peersAimiel is well respected by his peersAimiel is well respected by his peersAimiel is well respected by his peersAimiel is well respected by his peersAimiel is well respected by his peersAimiel is well respected by his peersAimiel is well respected by his peersAimiel is well respected by his peersAimiel is well respected by his peersAimiel is well respected by his peersAimiel is well respected by his peers
June 14th, 2010, 08:10 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Non-Excluvistic View Post
There is a thread for the Christian disagreements on who was Jesus. Go do that on that thread.
You can't come onto a Christian forum and then tell Christians not to post in your thread.





"Surely the Lord GOD will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets." -- Amos 3:7
   
Reply With Quote
  (#65) Old
john w john w is offline
TOL Legend
 john w's Avatar

 

Reputation:
john w is well respected by his peers
john w is well respected by his peersjohn w is well respected by his peersjohn w is well respected by his peersjohn w is well respected by his peersjohn w is well respected by his peersjohn w is well respected by his peersjohn w is well respected by his peersjohn w is well respected by his peersjohn w is well respected by his peersjohn w is well respected by his peersjohn w is well respected by his peersjohn w is well respected by his peersjohn w is well respected by his peersjohn w is well respected by his peers
June 14th, 2010, 04:58 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerald View Post
Which "Rocky" are we talking about, Marciano or Balboa?

If Balboa, then Ali wins by default because Balboa is a fictional character.
_
I thought we were talking about Rocky the squirrel. Rocky Balboa is not a fictional character! I have seen him in the "original" Rocky 45 times, and in Rocky 2, Rocky 3, Rocky 4, Rocky 5, and.......


Do you think Mohammad Ali today, in his 70's, could beat "the pope?"





Saint John W

Last edited by john w; June 14th, 2010 at 06:38 PM.
   
Reply With Quote
  (#66) Old
john w john w is offline
TOL Legend
 john w's Avatar

 

Reputation:
john w is well respected by his peers
john w is well respected by his peersjohn w is well respected by his peersjohn w is well respected by his peersjohn w is well respected by his peersjohn w is well respected by his peersjohn w is well respected by his peersjohn w is well respected by his peersjohn w is well respected by his peersjohn w is well respected by his peersjohn w is well respected by his peersjohn w is well respected by his peersjohn w is well respected by his peersjohn w is well respected by his peersjohn w is well respected by his peers
June 14th, 2010, 05:00 PM

Do you think Mohammad Ali could beat the Flying Nun?





Saint John W
   
Reply With Quote
  (#67) Old
Desert Reign Desert Reign is offline
Gold level Subscriber
 Desert Reign's Avatar

 


Reputation:
Desert Reign is well respected by his peersDesert Reign is well respected by his peersDesert Reign is well respected by his peersDesert Reign is well respected by his peersDesert Reign is well respected by his peersDesert Reign is well respected by his peersDesert Reign is well respected by his peersDesert Reign is well respected by his peersDesert Reign is well respected by his peersDesert Reign is well respected by his peersDesert Reign is well respected by his peersDesert Reign is well respected by his peers
June 14th, 2010, 05:18 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Non-Excluvistic View Post
I just wanted to share the truths about Muhammad (pbuh) as a person to clear up the false things said in slander. Remember to watch the documentary below, it is very educational about Islamic history, and what we Muslims think of Muhammad (pbuh) and the misconception about terrorism being an Islamic teaching--to Muslims it is offensive to be grouped with the actions of the extremist.

Quran 60:8- GOD does not forbid you from befriending those who do not fight you because of religion, and do not evict you from your homes. You may befriend them and be equitable towards them. GOD loves the equitable.[/color]
Let me be frank with you: I do not wish peace upon Mohammed. Islam, which he founded, is a blight upon the Earth.

And I am so pleased to hear that your god does not forbid you from befriending those outside your religion who do not actively hate Islam. Sadly, such effrontery is not unique. Jesus commanded his disciples to love their enemies and commented that even thieves love their own kind. I hope that one day you will understand for yourself the effrontery of the statement you quote above and that you will see light and truth in the face of Jesus, the one who said 'My yoke is easy and my burden light'.





Total Misanthropy.
Uncertain salvation.
Luck of the draw.
Irresistible damnation.
Persecution of the saints.
   
Reply With Quote
  (#68) Old
Non-Excluvistic Non-Excluvistic is offline
BANNED

 

Reputation:
Non-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselves
June 14th, 2010, 05:26 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Desert Reign View Post
Let me be frank with you: I do not wish peace upon Mohammed. Islam, which he founded, is a blight upon the Earth.
Well, I definitely believe in approaching others on the level they approach me on. So, let me be frank with you: I do not care what you wish, nor do I care what you approve. Judgment belongs to God, and I'll let him judge.

Now, if you are interested in learning about the prophet, ask away, if not that is fine too.


"Jesus commanded his disciples to love their enemies and commented that even thieves love their own kind."

If you truly believed that then you would not wish harm upon anyone, as you did to Muhammad (pbuh) as you said: I do not wish peace upon Mohammad.

Viper snake like kindness is not the love Jesus preached, nor would he have not wished peace upon anyone.

Get your spirit right.



   
Reply With Quote
  (#69) Old
Desert Reign Desert Reign is offline
Gold level Subscriber
 Desert Reign's Avatar

 


Reputation:
Desert Reign is well respected by his peersDesert Reign is well respected by his peersDesert Reign is well respected by his peersDesert Reign is well respected by his peersDesert Reign is well respected by his peersDesert Reign is well respected by his peersDesert Reign is well respected by his peersDesert Reign is well respected by his peersDesert Reign is well respected by his peersDesert Reign is well respected by his peersDesert Reign is well respected by his peersDesert Reign is well respected by his peers
June 14th, 2010, 05:27 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePresbyteers View Post
god told Muhammad that Jesus ~didn't~ die on the cross.
God told the disciples that Jesus ~did~ die on the cross.

Does anyone see a contradiction here? I do.

Something really fishy is going here.
Let alone that some of the disciples actually saw him die.





Total Misanthropy.
Uncertain salvation.
Luck of the draw.
Irresistible damnation.
Persecution of the saints.
   
Reply With Quote
  (#70) Old
Non-Excluvistic Non-Excluvistic is offline
BANNED

 

Reputation:
Non-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselves
June 14th, 2010, 05:33 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Desert Reign View Post
Let alone that some of the disciples actually saw him die.
Which one saw him die? Name them, and see if all the gospels would agree. Two gospels can't even decide on which day he died on, let alone who was there. When all the gospels agree with the details of how this happened, and the details of after, then I'll agree with you on that; until then, it's your faith belief, and not mine. You take the dogma, and I'll take the teachings of Jesus (pbuh).



   
Reply With Quote
  (#71) Old
Desert Reign Desert Reign is offline
Gold level Subscriber
 Desert Reign's Avatar

 


Reputation:
Desert Reign is well respected by his peersDesert Reign is well respected by his peersDesert Reign is well respected by his peersDesert Reign is well respected by his peersDesert Reign is well respected by his peersDesert Reign is well respected by his peersDesert Reign is well respected by his peersDesert Reign is well respected by his peersDesert Reign is well respected by his peersDesert Reign is well respected by his peersDesert Reign is well respected by his peersDesert Reign is well respected by his peers
June 14th, 2010, 05:49 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Non-Excluvistic View Post
Which ones saw him die? Name them, and see if all the gospels would agree. Two gospels can't even decide on which day he died on, let alone who was there. When all the gospels agree with the details of how this happened, and the details of after, then I'll agree with you on that; until then, it's your faith belief, and not mine.
The contradiction between the Koran and truth, whether historical or moral, is yours to resolve. You sound like you are trying to convince yourself that it is someone else's. The Gospels are what they are, you can't expect them to change now. Islam does not pass the test of truth.





Total Misanthropy.
Uncertain salvation.
Luck of the draw.
Irresistible damnation.
Persecution of the saints.
   
Reply With Quote
  (#72) Old
Non-Excluvistic Non-Excluvistic is offline
BANNED

 

Reputation:
Non-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselves
June 14th, 2010, 06:19 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Desert Reign View Post
The contradiction between the Koran and truth, whether historical or moral, is yours to resolve.
It's been solved for me, I am a Muslim.

You take the dogma, and I'll take the teachings of Jesus (pbuh)

Truth is GOd, and he will inform us over that which we dispute.



   
Reply With Quote
  (#73) Old
ThePresbyteers ThePresbyteers is offline
Over 2000 post club
 ThePresbyteers's Avatar

 

Reputation:
ThePresbyteers is making a name for themselvesThePresbyteers is making a name for themselvesThePresbyteers is making a name for themselvesThePresbyteers is making a name for themselvesThePresbyteers is making a name for themselvesThePresbyteers is making a name for themselvesThePresbyteers is making a name for themselvesThePresbyteers is making a name for themselvesThePresbyteers is making a name for themselves
June 14th, 2010, 06:19 PM

This message is deleted and closed.




Last edited by ThePresbyteers; September 13th, 2010 at 07:09 AM.
   
Reply With Quote
  (#74) Old
Non-Excluvistic Non-Excluvistic is offline
BANNED

 

Reputation:
Non-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselves
June 14th, 2010, 06:28 PM

5:48 Then we revealed to you this scripture, truthfully, confirming previous scriptures, and superseding them. You shall rule among them in accordance with GOD's revelations, and do not follow their wishes if they differ from the truth that came to you. For each of you, we have decreed laws (shari'ah) and different rites. Had GOD willed, He could have made you one congregation. But He thus puts you to the test through the revelations He has given each of you. You shall compete in righteousness. To GOD is your final destiny - all of you - then He will inform you of everything you had disputed.

You have your beliefs and I'll have mine. If the evidence was so strong, then those who once believed and went further in scholarship wouldn't fall from belief. Some continue to believe, and some see no reason to believe it anymore, so belief is subjective when it comes to faith based claims, and I'll wait for God to tell me if I'm wrong or not. The human sacrifice belief is of no value to me, and I have my reasons that made me turn from the belief in it's validity and necessity.

If you are secure in your belief in it, then why are why are we having this convo about it? Surely you're not convincing me.

To you your religion, and to me mine.



   
Reply With Quote
  (#75) Old
Non-Excluvistic Non-Excluvistic is offline
BANNED

 

Reputation:
Non-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselvesNon-Excluvistic is making a name for themselves
June 14th, 2010, 06:44 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by bling View Post
Muhammad seemed to have two sides and was not consistent. He did wind up with lots of money, land, wives, power and a larg home.

Why did he not call God father or shepherd?
Muhammad was selfless, and gave his all and went broke doing so. You need to read up on Muhammad, instead of asserting things. Muhammad was no selfish person, and he made sure everyone had what they needed. IF you take time to read about him, then you would know his beliefs concerning wealth and taking care of one another. If you even read the words within his farewell sermon, then it would answer that question.

Coming from someone whose religion places so much emphasis on giving and getting financial reward from God, what is the bases of your argument?



   
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
allah, islam, muhammad, muslim


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
Copyright ©1997-2012 TheologyOnLine

Logos Bible Study Software Up to 15% OFF FOR THEOLOGYONLINE MEMBERS! Study twice, post once.
Logos Bible Software —take your Bible study to the next level.