[JWStipple]

Information can be made up, via imagination, using our brains, similar to the ToE.

Can you show me an example of information that is NOT dependent on some physical / material container or structure in order to keep the information in place? Are you saying that the brain is not a physical / material container or structure?

However Darwin died and that information carries on.

How is it carried on...if not in other physical / material containers or structures?

[I aint no monkey]

Originally Posted by alwight

Darwin was a creationist himself of course. He was until real first hand observations of nature and the way species adapted, to different environments of different islands, convinced him that natural selection was a crucial factor. With the truth of natural selection (and artificial selection) well established then by extension, the ToE is not really such a big leap of the imagination.
The ToE remains the accepted way that all life developed, not just mankind, by those of all shades of theistic belief. It is not some kind of atheistic plot.

The modern mainstream scientific establishment is commited to naturalism, so in a way it is a plot of unintended consequences.

[TeeJay]

=DavisBJ;2476511]Tom, recently you said to me that “If intelligent minds did not exist, then no intelligent information can exist.” If an asteroid were to kill all large life forms on the earth (including all people), yet some small animals, plants, insects, bacteria, etc survived, then it must be that their DNA is no longer “intelligent information”. Would it suddenly quit functioning?

Brian, the answer is no. But I will not let you skip A and go to B. Where did the DNA come from?

God bless, Tom From Mabank, TX

[Jukia]

Originally Posted by I aint no monkey

Information can be made up, via imagination, using our brains, similar to the ToE. However Darwin died and that information carries on.

Ah, I have it now. We just need to not use our brains. Got it.

[I aint no monkey]

Originally Posted by JWStipple

Can you show me an example of information that is NOT dependent on some physical / material container or structure in order to keep the information in place? Are you saying that the brain is not a physical / material container or structure?



How is it carried on...if not in other physical / material containers or structures?

When we talk, information goes from our brains, through the air, and into someone else's brain. I'm not sure I understand the question. The information changes mediums many times from our brain to someone elses. The information is not medium specific.

[Jukia]

Originally Posted by I aint no monkey

The modern mainstream scientific establishment is commited to naturalism, so in a way it is a plot.

Yeah and that naturalism has given you a longer life span, better food, better health, better transportation, even the computer you type on. Some plot.

[taikoo]

Originally Posted by I aint no monkey

The modern mainstream scientific establishment is commited to naturalism, so in a way it is a plot.

ahhh. yes. the conspiracy theory, a winner every time.

[TeeJay]

Originally Posted by taikoo

another lie

taikoo, if it's a lie then you should be able to refute it easily.

In an atheist worldview, morality has to be relative. Do you agree?

If relative, then no behavior can be deemed moral or immoral by anyone. Do you agree?

If no behavior can be deemed moral or immoral in an atheist worldview, then absolute morality can only exist within a Christian worldview. Do you agree. If not, why not?

God bless, Tom from Mabank, TX

[alwight]

Originally Posted by I aint no monkey

The modern mainstream scientific establishment is commited to naturalism, so in a way it is a plot.

So a global evil atheistic scientist's plot that theistic scientists have also signed up to it is then? Yeah right.

[I aint no monkey]

Originally Posted by taikoo

ahhh. yes. the conspiracy theory, a winner every time.

No conspiracy, it is just unintended consequences of the naturalist position.

[taikoo]

Originally Posted by I aint no monkey

Let me correct that for you. No scientist wanting a paycheck will question evolution.

why do you insist on making up nonsense and, really, just lying?

if.. that is since... you have no actual information on the subject of evolution, certainly nothing to present against it, why not just accept that, and either learn something, or admit you dont have a clue?

I bet you have never met a scientist in your life.

[Granite]

In an atheist worldview, morality has to be relative. Do you agree?

"Has" to be? I'd say it just "is."

If relative, then no behavior can be deemed moral or immoral by anyone. Do you agree?

Nope, not at all...

If no behavior can be deemed moral or immoral in an atheist worldview, then absolute morality can only exist within a Christian worldview. Do you agree. If not, why not?

Is Christianity the only organized religion on the planet?

Do you actually believe that you're putting real thought into these questions?

[Jukia]

Originally Posted by I aint no monkey

No conspiracy, it is just unintended consequences of the naturalist position.

Actually, I think the consequences are intended. An understanding of the world/universe.

[alwight]

Originally Posted by I aint no monkey

No conspiracy, it is just unintended consequences of the naturalist position.

A sort of natural selection then, but thankfully we have the "unbiased" services of creationists like AiG to point this out to the rest of us.

[Jukia]

[quote=Granite;2476620
Do you actually believe that you're putting real thought into these questions?[/QUOTE]

Doesn't need to, he has the Bible. Back in the day I had the Catholic Church. Same result. No thought or intellectual curiosity needed.