[chair]

Well, as usual, Will has shown up, cut and pasted endless verses that don't prove anything, evades some rather obvious and simple questions- then disappears.

But not to worry. Give it a few months, and he'll be back for another round of the same.

Good to know that you can count on some things in this world.

[brandplucked]

Originally Posted by chair

Well, as usual, Will has shown up, cut and pasted endless verses that don't prove anything, evades some rather obvious and simple questions- then disappears.

But not to worry. Give it a few months, and he'll be back for another round of the same.

Good to know that you can count on some things in this world.

I'm still here. You guys just aren't saying anything of value. You have admitted that you don't believe that any Bible in any language is the inerrant words of God and you are clearly among those fine fellows who do attack the true Bible. You have added nothing to the conversation, so I just stop responding.

I have already made my points and some will have ears to hear the truth and others will not. That is God's part, not mine.

Will K

[Ask Mr. Religion]

BP,

How about joining some of the theological discussions related to soteriology and sharing your wisdom therein? Why focus strictly on the KJB translation matter?

AMR

[brandplucked]

Originally Posted by Ask Mr. Religion

BP,

How about joining some of the theological discussions related to soteriology and sharing your wisdom therein? Why focus strictly on the KJB translation matter?

AMR

Because I believe the #1 issue facing the church today is whether or not the Bible IS the inerrant words of God or not. You all can go on with your teaching and sermonizing all you want, but if all your teaching comes from a Bible that not even you believe is the inerrant words of God and the final written authority, then what is the point?

You fellas have an "almost" Bible that is "pretty close" with "not too many errors" but "No translation is perfect", yet you all teach and preach out of these "almost, pretty close, some errors, not perfect and not inerrant" multiple choice bible versions. It comes across as more than a little hypocritical and shallow of any real meaning when not even you guys believe The Book is the inspired and inerrant words of God. That's why.

Will K

[HisServant]

KJV = gay approved bible..that alone should say enough.

Besides, God never promised us a 'bible'... that is a non-believers contrivance. I would go as far as to say, that your views show you are far from being a child of God.

You need to repent and humble yourself before the Lord and pray that the Holy Spirit will write his laws on your heart and mind...because if you look to a book to do it for you..you have a serious problem.

[chair]

Originally Posted by brandplucked

I'm still here. You guys just aren't saying anything of value. You have admitted that you don't believe that any Bible in any language is the inerrant words of God and you are clearly among those fine fellows who do attack the true Bible. You have added nothing to the conversation, so I just stop responding.

I have already made my points and some will have ears to hear the truth and others will not. That is God's part, not mine.

Will K

I see. Only people who agree with you can say anything of "value". That way you are insulated and don't have to deal with serious criticism of your stance.

[unknown]

Originally Posted by brandplucked

Because I believe the #1 issue facing the church today is whether or not the Bible IS the inerrant words of God or not. You all can go on with your teaching and sermonizing all you want, but if all your teaching comes from a Bible that not even you believe is the inerrant words of God and the final written authority, then what is the point?

You fellas have an "almost" Bible that is "pretty close" with "not too many errors" but "No translation is perfect", yet you all teach and preach out of these "almost, pretty close, some errors, not perfect and not inerrant" multiple choice bible versions. It comes across as more than a little hypocritical and shallow of any real meaning when not even you guys believe The Book is the inspired and inerrant words of God. That's why.

Will K

Your obsession with demoting "The Word of God" to such as base level as the KJB is not woking on this end.

1. The KJB has been with us 400 years, why are churches that preach from it making different claims about what it means? A divided kingdom will fall, read the book. The word of God does not return void, why hasn't the kjb corrected the church?

2. The phrase "word of God" is used 4 times in the KjV OT and 44 times in the NT.*

1 Samuel 9:27
And as they were going down to the end of the city, Samuel said to Saul, Bid the servant pass on before us, (and he passed on), but stand thou still a while, that I may shew thee the word of God.

1 Kings 12:22
But the word of God came unto Shemaiah the man of God, saying,

1 Chronicles 17:3
And it came to pass the same night, that the word of God came to Nathan, saying,

Proverbs 30:5
Every word of God is pure: he is a shield unto them that put their trust in him


You can look up the rest. You think that "the word of God" is written in a book? Try substituting "kjb" for "word of God" in any scripture, it won't work.
Creation was established by the word of God. The word of God is truth (reality), not some idea written in a book.

3. James comissioned his bible supposedly becase he wanted an accurate translation. From what did he translate it, *if there was no infallible bible?

Nevermind you're not listening anyway........