ReligionDiscuss General Theology, Religions and Denominations, God's Attributes, Predestination and Free Will, Dispensationalism, Eschatology, Philosophy, Origins, Archaeology, Science, World History and other such topics.
Above quote is Nick M and MrDeets neg reps in my user cp.
Nick M and MrDeet lose their word of credibility by resort in those kind of malicious comments.
And Inzle whom MrDeets talks so highly seems to deleted all her neg report she gave me; they all disappered from my user cp.
not that you can read me post, (because apparently unbeknown to myself I am a trin and warmonger, go figure ) but when you put someone on ignore all their neg reps, well all their reps either way disappear from your user CP area, that's kind of implied with the word "ignore".
I wouldn't read too much into it.
no doubt you have hundreds of neg reps, but with more than half the site on ignore you won't see them, the only ones you'll see are the few stragglers you have yet to falsely accuse, condemn, and put on ignore, but give it some time at this rate eventually there should be no one's rep comments showing up in there. <---just love that little guy!
Slogan/motto:
Of course you realize this means war! ~ Bugs Bunny
Reputation:
February 8th, 2012, 07:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by locomotivebreath
I would have to go back through my posts and I will be happily corrected if I'm wrong, however, I don't believe I called her a JW. I believe the wording was similar to she was a follower of Russel Taze, was a BibleStudent, and left their group but retained many of their beliefs.
How did you just *happen* to join this forum AFTER Meshak?
Meshak Join Date: December 28th, 2011
locomotivebreath Join Date: February 3rd, 2012
Quote:
If that is the case, and I believe it is, graceandpeace, I believe you've just slandered me.
And, I've spoken nothing but the truth of her.
Being that you are a newbie yourself, there is only YOUR word to take for this.
Being that the majority of your posts have been attacks against Meshak, your character and motives are questionable ... to say the least.
Quote:
I believe, if you'll search back through my posts, you'll find what I've said to be true and there should be an apology forthcoming. Let's do the right thing here shall we?
How about you quit stalking Meshak and actually start some debating rather than instigating?
Thus far you are showing yourself as nothing more than a mean-spirited gossip and internet stalker.
"Hatred is the coward's revenge for being intimidated." ~ George Bernard Shaw
Last edited by Rusha; February 8th, 2012 at 12:43 PM.
Being that the majority of your posts have been attacks against Meshak, your character and motives are questionable ... to say the least.
I've defended Genesis 2 and 3 with a few folks, the Trinity. I've remarked that Sabellianism was condemned in the 3rd century. I don't know I'm an equal opportunity offender I guess. If the adminstrator of the forum finds me unacceptable I'm sure he'll do what he has to do. Otherwise, for the time being, I'm sort of enjoying myself here.
Slogan/motto:
"Come now, and let us reason together, saith the Lord" Isaiah 1:18
Reputation:
February 8th, 2012, 12:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by graceandpeace
I would suggest that it is not just 'her'...but, how she was treated when she first came here, by those whom rejected what she said. The flesh often returns evil with evil, and, it is wrong to say it was just her, in mho....everyone who participated is just as guilty as her, and the whole point being is that 'some' think they are above others on this board, which is the true hypocrissy.
No doubt it is not just meshak's fault she's attacked. But it is primarily her fault. Look at the small dialog we had in another thread:
I am above no one, I speak the truth, in love....if someone rejects it, sometimes I return their hatred with not so nice comments, but I never EVER claim I do not.
Those whom do, are the real hypocrits...and, it is very apparant as to who they are.
That's fine, but I am trying to help meshak, not them, since they are not in danger of being banned or shunned.
It's kind of like saying JoeyArnold was not responsible for his own downfall. Of course he received so much flak for small things, but it was still his fault in the end.
It's good that at least someone is defending meshak. Kudos to you for that. But she needs to learn how to be constructive.
James 3:17
But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, and easy to be intreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality, and without hypocrisy.
I've defended Genesis 2 and 3 with a few folks, the Trinity. I've remarked that Sabellianism was condemned in the 3rd century. I don't know I'm an equal opportunity offender I guess. If the adminstrator of the forum finds me unacceptable I'm sure he'll do what he has to do. Otherwise, for the time being, I'm sort of enjoying myself here.
That's fine, but I am trying to help meshak, not them, since they are not in danger of being banned or shunned.
It's kind of like saying JoeyArnold was not responsible for his own downfall. Of course he received so much flak for small things, but it was still his fault in the end.
It's good that at least someone is defending meshak. Kudos to you for that. But she needs to learn how to be constructive.
I understand, Mike...just wanted to point out the facts. Some here think they are without fault in the Meshak fiasco, and, to me they are the real hypocrits...as for Meshak, she presented her case, with scripture...but, no one ever wants to talk about the scriptures themselves.
I've defended Genesis 2 and 3 with a few folks, the Trinity. I've remarked that Sabellianism was condemned in the 3rd century. I don't know I'm an equal opportunity offender I guess. If the adminstrator of the forum finds me unacceptable I'm sure he'll do what he has to do. Otherwise, for the time being, I'm sort of enjoying myself here.
I would also point out to you that you cannot claim someone is a heretic due to the fact that they are not trinitarians, I am not one, myself..a heretic is someone that rejects the gospel, and man made doctrines are not the gospel, so until you can rightly learn to use the word 'heretic' in a right way, it is not wise to call others that ugly name.
The word "heretic" means someone that does not accept the gospel of HOW we are saved.
It does not include added doctrines of men, that seek to interpret other doctrines.
I would also point out to you that you cannot claim someone is a heretic due to the fact that they are not trinitarians, I am not one, myself..a heretic is someone that rejects the gospel, and man made doctrines are not the gospel, so until you can rightly learn to use the word 'heretic' in a right way, it is not wise to call others that ugly name.
The word "heretic" means someone that does not accept the gospel of HOW we are saved.
It does not include added doctrines of men, that seek to interpret other doctrines.
Meshak believes that we are saved by works, so on that basis she can be called a heretic.
Also a strong case can be, and has been, made from scripture to explain why we believe in the trinity. To regard it as a doctrine of men is to disregard much scriptural evidence. I do not believe in the Trinity because I was told to, but because I have read the scriptures and I believe that is what it says.
Meshak believes that we are saved by works, so on that basis she can be called a heretic.
Also a strong case can be, and has been, made from scripture to explain why we believe in the trinity. To regard it as a doctrine of men is to disregard much scriptural evidence. I do not believe in the Trinity because I was told to, but because I have read the scriptures and I believe that is what it says.
she does not believe you are saved by works..she believes RIGHTLY so that you cannot separate them..from your salvation...which is the biblical truth. If you do not have works of LOVE, you do not have Jesus living in you, period..He will work.,
as for the trinity; I have been taught it, disected it, tried to find it in the bible, and still could not embrace it, so, to each his/her own, do not call me a heretic for what is not written.
For example, the trinity teaches that only the Son died for your sins, while the bible says that Jesus was the fulness of the Godhead bodily, and that HE would be called the Father...which is what I do believe.
I believe in one God, that was the great I AM, the Father, whom was also the Son, and you cannot separate them into different persons, that co existed outside of each other..that is polytheism, for crying out loud.
) but when you put someone on ignore all their neg reps, well all their reps either way disappear from your user CP area, that's kind of implied with the word "ignore".
<---just love that little guy!
Linear Mode
