I quote nothing because you're unworthy of more consideration. You owe me an apology. I never disputed omitting your scripture and never failed to point out precisely why.
As to the lie: for anyone reading here who missed it, see post 72.
SD: [You removed the scripture from my quote (Eph 4:14).]
TH: "I did. It rarely has any actual linkage and is offered as a means of giving your declarations authority they lack as rational posits."...
SD: [You removed the scripture from my quote.]
TH: "Did I?"
SD: [You did (Eph 4:14). It's ok to make a mistake. What's not ok is doubling down when your error is pointed out.]...
SD: [Misquoting me (Eph 4:14).]
TH: "So I did."
SD: Right.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Town Heretic
"I quote nothing because you're unworthy of more consideration."
"I never disputed omitting your scripture and never failed to point out precisely why."
You justify misquoting others (Eph 4:14). I advised you of your need to use brackets ( [] ) and/or ellipsis (…) when quoting others and you have made it clear that you will not. Summary
I'm not going to dignify your peculiar attempt to will something into existence that never happened by repeatedly lying about what did, but to touch a couple of the other points: I never disputed omitting your scripture and never failed to point out precisely why. Aldo, I use ellipses and always have.
You should get your money back from whatever junior college handed you an attendance certificate.
As to the lie: for anyone reading here who missed it, see post 72.
SD: [You removed the scripture from my quote (Eph 4:14).]
TH: "I did. It rarely has any actual linkage and is offered as a means of giving your declarations authority they lack as rational posits."...
SD: [You removed the scripture from my quote.]
TH: "Did I?"
SD: [You did (Eph 4:14). It's ok to make a mistake. What's not ok is doubling down when your error is pointed out.]...
SD: [Misquoting me (Eph 4:14).]
TH: "So I did."
SD: Right.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Town Heretic
"I'm not going to dignify your peculiar attempt to will something into existence that never happened by repeatedly lying about what did.."
SD: [You removed the scripture from my quote (Eph 4:14).]
TH: "I did. It rarely has any actual linkage and is offered as a means of giving your declarations authority they lack as rational posits."...
SD: [You removed the scripture from my quote.]
TH: "Did I?"
SD: [You did (Eph 4:14). It's ok to make a mistake. What's not ok is doubling down when your error is pointed out.]...
SD: [Misquoting me (Eph 4:14).]
TH: "So I did."
SD: Right.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Town Heretic
"...I'm not going to dignify your peculiar attempt to will something into existence that never happened."
I read and I decided that you misrepresented what TH said. Because you did.
Also, I've read (again and again) and decided that you hack up and misrepresent what people say more than anyone else here & active at TOL... So much so that I decided that you squawking about someone misrepresenting other people's posts is absurd to the point of insanity.
"There was so much handwriting on the wall that even the wall fell down"
"In the long run of history, the censor and the inquisitor have always lost. The only sure weapon against bad ideas is better ideas. The source of better ideas is wisdom. The surest path to wisdom is a liberal education." – Alfred Whitney, Essays on Education
Don't you know
That it ain't a crime
If all the squares
And the junkmen
Think you're out of line
Location: Precariously balanced on top of a mineshaft
Rep Power: 156590
Other
More left than right
Slogan/motto:
Blah, waffle, moan, grumble etc....
Reputation:
May 3rd, 2012, 08:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zoo22
I read and I decided that you misrepresented what TH said. Because you did.
Also, I've read (again and again) and decided that you hack up and misrepresent what people say more than anyone else here & active at TOL... So much so that I decided that you squawking about someone misrepresenting other people's posts is absurd to the point of insanity.
I'm sorry, but I feel at this point I must leap in here to SD's offence....
Proof please...
ad hominem
Kmo is a skirting board and PB is Ozzy Ozbourne etc etc...
"There was so much handwriting on the wall that even the wall fell down"
"In the long run of history, the censor and the inquisitor have always lost. The only sure weapon against bad ideas is better ideas. The source of better ideas is wisdom. The surest path to wisdom is a liberal education." – Alfred Whitney, Essays on Education
Don't you know
That it ain't a crime
If all the squares
And the junkmen
Think you're out of line
[SD: There they are (Ps 17:12).] "There they are." [04 May 2012 10:58:57]
Charles Miner: No, it is not.
Michael Scott: No, it is not.
Charles Miner: Okay, so we're on the same page, great.
Michael Scott: Okay, so we're on the same page, great.
Charles Miner: Okay, Michael.
Michael Scott: Okay, Michael.
Charles Miner: No, seriously.
Michael Scott: No, seriously.
Charles Miner: How old are you?
Michael Scott: How old are you?
Pam Beesly: I can tell Michael's mood by which comedy routine he chooses to do. The more infantile the more upset he is. And he just skipped the Ace Ventura talking butt thing. He never skips it. This is bad. ~ The Office
Ad hominem
What's new? 
~ J Vernon McGee Ro 3:23, 5:8, 6:23, 10:9, 10:13.
And post 
~ The Office
Linear Mode
