toldailytopic: Are pro sports organizations liable for the longterm injuries that the
TOL Topic of the Day - Chime In!Every day we will post a new topic and we want to get your comments on that topic. The topic could be about literally anything from the vague to the specific, important or trivial. The TOL membership can take that topic and run with it!
But if a team doctor was lying to players and clearing them to play while knowing it was a danger to them, then the team is liable I think.
Absolutely. Are we supposed to let this behavior slide? There needs to be accountability somewhere along the line.
Quote:
But everyone knows there is an inherent risk to sports (except soccer). Without some glaring negilgence by the team/league at the time, no, there shouldn't be a lawsuit.
Agreed, although I suspect negligence will out. Like I said, the risks are understood, but misleading your players, lying to them about injuries that could have devastating consequences and side effects? That's beyond sick. That's beyond twisted. That's wanton cruelty.
Quote:
I've heard (on a local sports radio station) that currently there are better helmets (safety-wise) available to players but they arent allowed to use them due to a contract with whoever supplies the current helmets. That's an open door for a future lawsuit.
Indeed. If the bottomline is the only priority, and player safety be damned, then this attitude makes sense--but it also puts a lie to Goodell's public stance on increased player safety.
Theocrats are Social Darwinists.
Christianity has nothing applicable, appropriate, or worthwhile to offer the 21st century.
The government (via the courts) will ultimately force the NFL to pay these athletes billions of dollars, yet wine and moan about paying a injured war veteran a small retirement.
Slogan/motto:
The author of all things watches over me, and I have a fine horse.
Reputation:
May 4th, 2012, 09:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knight
The TheologyOnline.com TOPIC OF THE DAY for May 4th, 2012 06:54 AM
toldailytopic: Are pro sports organizations liable for the longterm injuries that the players may have suffered?
Nope, I don't believe so. I love professional sports, but no one forces folks to participate.
The Lord bless you and keep you;
The Lord make His face shine upon you,
And be gracious to you;
The Lord lift up His countenance upon you,
And give you peace.
The government (via the courts) will ultimately force the NFL to pay these athletes billions of dollars, yet wine and moan about paying a injured war veteran a small retirement.
Liberals are jerks.
here is just another good reason to vote republican
Slogan/motto:
Never be haughty to the humble; never be humble to the haughty.
Reputation:
May 4th, 2012, 10:44 AM
The government (via the courts) will ultimately force the NFL to pay these athletes billions of dollars, yet wine and moan about paying a injured war veteran a small retirement.
For the last four years, the Bush Administration has been encouraging congressional Republicans to reduce veterans’ benefits and health care; most of the time they backed down in the face of strong Democratic opposition. Now the administration seems to have switched tactics: give today to take away even more tomorrow. The 2006 budget appears to be only the beginning of the administration’s drive to decrease the veterans’ budget...Last year the head of the Veterans of Foreign Wars called a similar Bush Administration budget “disgraceful” and “deplorable.” In the coming years, if Bush is relected, we can expect the VFW to use words like “even more disgraceful” and “even more deplorable.” http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles...4bushplans.htm
That I'm aware I don't use the word often although Orwell noted as early as the 1940s that "fascist" had already become equally worthless and meaningless.
Theocrats are Social Darwinists.
Christianity has nothing applicable, appropriate, or worthwhile to offer the 21st century.
So, anyway... I do feel sorry for the guys from the earlier years who didnt make an insane amount of money and now have problems. I dont think they should be awarded millions, but helping them with healthcare seems like the right thing to do. Do NFL teams have workmans comp insurance? I'm not totally sure how it works but I'm pretty sure if a guy working for me got hurt with permanent disabilities he going to get some sort of compensation.
Marge: "Aren't you going to give him the last rites?"
Rev. Lovejoy: "That's Catholic, Marge - you might as well ask me to do a voodoo dance."
"Oh bother" said Pooh, as he chambered the next round.
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. - Benjamin Franklin
Slogan/motto:
In a world with so many ready to hear, why waste words on the willfully deaf?
Reputation:
May 4th, 2012, 01:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knight
So... what do you think?
Should the NFL and other pro sports organizations be held liable for the injuries that may have a lasting effect on the athletes who played in their sport? Or is it the chance you take to play a contact sport? After all you are being paid a huge sum of money to play in the league.
It depends entirely on whether or not there was deception or negligence involved on the part of the teams or the league as a whole. If, for example, they pressured players to continue to play injured without properly informing them of the extent of their injuries and the possible long term effects, then there's going to be a degree of liability involved. On the other hand if the players were fully informed of these things and made the decision to play anyway, then the responsibility is entirely theirs.
"When the lights go out all over the world, when history seems headed only into a dead end and total disaster, God brings forth light. He changes the direction of history and regenerates men and redirects events and institutions to fulfill His purposes."