Theology Online | Christian Forums & More

  
Active Threads
Social Groups
Go Back   Theology Online | Christian Forums & More > Politics, Religion, And The Rest > Politics
Reload this Page If you could overturn 1 Supreme Court case...
Politics Current Events, Abortion, homosexuality, gun control, public schools, welfare, taxes, government etc.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  (#1) Old
kmoney kmoney is offline
I'm not a player, I just crush a lot
 kmoney's Avatar

 



Reputation:
kmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peers
kmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peers
If you could overturn 1 Supreme Court case... - June 11th, 2012, 05:32 PM

...what would it be? And why?

And for the purposes of this thread, I'm excluding Roe v Wade or other abortion related cases. That isn't indicative of my abortion stance; I just know that Roe v Wade would probably overwhelm the thread and I'm not interested in another abortion debate. I'm curious to see what other SCOTUS cases people think were in error.







Slow dancing in a burning room.

Don't tase me, bro!!
   
Reply With Quote
  (#2) Old
annabenedetti annabenedetti is offline
Silver Member
 annabenedetti's Avatar

 


Reputation:
annabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peers
annabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peers
June 11th, 2012, 05:39 PM

Dred Scott

1. The Supreme Court's ruling that Scott, because he was of African ancestry (this applied to slaves and free men) couldn't be a citizen and so couldn't sue in federal court.

2. It also ruled that the federal government couldn't prohibit slavery in the territories.



   
Reply With Quote
  (#3) Old
kmoney kmoney is offline
I'm not a player, I just crush a lot
 kmoney's Avatar

 



Reputation:
kmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peers
kmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peers
June 11th, 2012, 05:44 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by annabenedetti View Post
Dred Scott
You missed the 2nd question.





Slow dancing in a burning room.

Don't tase me, bro!!
   
Reply With Quote
  (#4) Old
annabenedetti annabenedetti is offline
Silver Member
 annabenedetti's Avatar

 


Reputation:
annabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peers
annabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peers
June 11th, 2012, 05:48 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by kmoney View Post
You missed the 2nd question.
No, just had to check my memory before I finished answering.



   
Reply With Quote
  (#5) Old
Alate_One Alate_One is offline
TOL Subscriber
 Alate_One's Avatar

 

Reputation:
Alate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peers
June 11th, 2012, 08:30 PM

Citizens United . . . equating money with speech will destroy democracy. Since the richest people/corporations will drown out ordinary people. That decision is a serious threat to the continued existence of the USA as we have known it.





“We do not believe in God because we need to explain this or that feature of the world. That is what science is for. We believe in God because we see something deeper in the world, something that transcends the scientific explanations.” - Karl Giberson Ph.D.

Some of the Evidence for Climate Change

The Biologos Foundation - The science and faith of theistic evolution explained.

What Darwin Never Knew
   
Reply With Quote
  (#6) Old
Lighthouse Lighthouse is offline
Not today
 Lighthouse's Avatar

 



Reputation:
Lighthouse is well respected by his peersLighthouse is well respected by his peersLighthouse is well respected by his peers
Lighthouse is well respected by his peersLighthouse is well respected by his peersLighthouse is well respected by his peersLighthouse is well respected by his peersLighthouse is well respected by his peersLighthouse is well respected by his peersLighthouse is well respected by his peersLighthouse is well respected by his peersLighthouse is well respected by his peersLighthouse is well respected by his peersLighthouse is well respected by his peersLighthouse is well respected by his peersLighthouse is well respected by his peersLighthouse is well respected by his peers
June 12th, 2012, 09:26 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by kmoney View Post
...what would it be? And why?

And for the purposes of this thread, I'm excluding Roe v Wade or other abortion related cases. That isn't indicative of my abortion stance; I just know that Roe v Wade would probably overwhelm the thread and I'm not interested in another abortion debate. I'm curious to see what other SCOTUS cases people think were in error.


Well, see, that's the thing. I wouldn't overturn Roe v. Wade, because with the laws as they currently are nothing would change. Since that ruling we've passed so many laws that will keep abortion legal even if that case was overturned that it would be pointless. If someone wants to make abortion illegal they'd have to pass an all encompassing law that would repeal all the laws that allow people to have abortions.

And beyond that case I'm not sure what case I would want to go after. Most cases with which I disagree have already been overturned. And even with things like the Scopes Monkey trial my stance on related issues makes the case irrelevant.

Quote:
Originally Posted by annabenedetti View Post
Dred Scott

1. The Supreme Court's ruling that Scott, because he was of African ancestry (this applied to slaves and free men) couldn't be a citizen and so couldn't sue in federal court.

2. It also ruled that the federal government couldn't prohibit slavery in the territories.
Wasn't this already overturned?





If to die isn't gain you're living in vain.
   
Reply With Quote
  (#7) Old
annabenedetti annabenedetti is offline
Silver Member
 annabenedetti's Avatar

 


Reputation:
annabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peers
annabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peersannabenedetti is well respected by his peers
June 12th, 2012, 09:40 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lighthouse View Post

Wasn't this already overturned?
Yes, through legislation. I guess I was reading the question differently.

kmo, did you only mean rulings that haven't as yet been overturned?

If so, then I'd have to say a landmark ruling that limited states' rights, although I don't know what it would be offhand.



   
Reply With Quote
  (#8) Old
kmoney kmoney is offline
I'm not a player, I just crush a lot
 kmoney's Avatar

 



Reputation:
kmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peers
kmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peers
June 14th, 2012, 02:31 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alate_One View Post
Citizens United . . . equating money with speech will destroy democracy. Since the richest people/corporations will drown out ordinary people. That decision is a serious threat to the continued existence of the USA as we have known it.
That's a contender in my book also.





Slow dancing in a burning room.

Don't tase me, bro!!
   
Reply With Quote
  (#9) Old
kmoney kmoney is offline
I'm not a player, I just crush a lot
 kmoney's Avatar

 



Reputation:
kmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peers
kmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peers
June 14th, 2012, 02:33 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lighthouse View Post
Well, see, that's the thing. I wouldn't overturn Roe v. Wade, because with the laws as they currently are nothing would change. Since that ruling we've passed so many laws that will keep abortion legal even if that case was overturned that it would be pointless. If someone wants to make abortion illegal they'd have to pass an all encompassing law that would repeal all the laws that allow people to have abortions.

And beyond that case I'm not sure what case I would want to go after. Most cases with which I disagree have already been overturned. And even with things like the Scopes Monkey trial my stance on related issues makes the case irrelevant.
Well. Fine. Then. :Plan:





Quote:
Originally Posted by annabenedetti View Post
Yes, through legislation. I guess I was reading the question differently.

kmo, did you only mean rulings that haven't as yet been overturned?

If so, then I'd have to say a landmark ruling that limited states' rights, although I don't know what it would be offhand.
I meant cases that haven't been overturned already. But I don't mind going outside of that for discussion.

And actually, instead of just naming 1, it would probably get more discussion to say name the top 3 worst decisions.

States' rights is a good topic too.





Slow dancing in a burning room.

Don't tase me, bro!!
   
Reply With Quote
  (#10) Old
kmoney kmoney is offline
I'm not a player, I just crush a lot
 kmoney's Avatar

 



Reputation:
kmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peers
kmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peerskmoney is well respected by his peers
June 16th, 2012, 06:30 AM

The Supreme Court will soon announce their decision on Obamacare. I wonder if that will get on some lists.





Slow dancing in a burning room.

Don't tase me, bro!!
   
Reply With Quote
  (#11) Old
rocketman rocketman is offline
A Day At The Office
 rocketman's Avatar

 



Reputation:
rocketman is well respected by his peersrocketman is well respected by his peersrocketman is well respected by his peers
rocketman is well respected by his peersrocketman is well respected by his peersrocketman is well respected by his peersrocketman is well respected by his peersrocketman is well respected by his peersrocketman is well respected by his peersrocketman is well respected by his peersrocketman is well respected by his peersrocketman is well respected by his peersrocketman is well respected by his peersrocketman is well respected by his peersrocketman is well respected by his peersrocketman is well respected by his peers
June 16th, 2012, 07:52 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by kmoney View Post
The Supreme Court will soon announce their decision on Obamacare. I wonder if that will get on some lists.
If it is ruled constitutional (though it is not), it has already made my list. What else will the Federal Government deem as necessary for all Americans to participate in? Or what other states rights do the Feds intend to trample on?





The winner of the 2011 Truthsmacker of the Year Award

   
Reply With Quote
  (#12) Old
Alate_One Alate_One is offline
TOL Subscriber
 Alate_One's Avatar

 

Reputation:
Alate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peers
June 25th, 2012, 09:40 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketman View Post
If it is ruled constitutional (though it is not), it has already made my list. What else will the Federal Government deem as necessary for all Americans to participate in? Or what other states rights do the Feds intend to trample on?
Even if the mandate is deemed unconstitutional all that has to be done is re-write it as a full on tax. Two thousand dollar tax on everyone that doesn't have health insurance and a tax credit for those that do.





“We do not believe in God because we need to explain this or that feature of the world. That is what science is for. We believe in God because we see something deeper in the world, something that transcends the scientific explanations.” - Karl Giberson Ph.D.

Some of the Evidence for Climate Change

The Biologos Foundation - The science and faith of theistic evolution explained.

What Darwin Never Knew
   
Reply With Quote
  (#13) Old
HisServant HisServant is offline
TOL Legend
 HisServant's Avatar

 

Reputation:
HisServant has a large reputationHisServant has a large reputationHisServant has a large reputationHisServant has a large reputationHisServant has a large reputationHisServant has a large reputationHisServant has a large reputationHisServant has a large reputationHisServant has a large reputationHisServant has a large reputationHisServant has a large reputation
June 25th, 2012, 09:42 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alate_One View Post
Even if the mandate is deemed unconstitutional all that has to be done is re-write it as a full on tax. Two thousand dollar tax on everyone that doesn't have health insurance and a tax credit for those that do.
And that has ZERO chance of ever getting passed through congress... it would be political suicide for both democrat and republican alike.



   
Reply With Quote
  (#14) Old
Alate_One Alate_One is offline
TOL Subscriber
 Alate_One's Avatar

 

Reputation:
Alate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peers
June 25th, 2012, 09:45 AM

FYI the Supreme court just doubled down on Citizens United. They've struck down a 100 year old state law in Montana. If that doesn't qualify as judicial activism I don't know what does.

So much for a "conservative" court. You may love the idea of using the supreme court to deal with abortion, but what we are getting instead is a corporatocracy.





“We do not believe in God because we need to explain this or that feature of the world. That is what science is for. We believe in God because we see something deeper in the world, something that transcends the scientific explanations.” - Karl Giberson Ph.D.

Some of the Evidence for Climate Change

The Biologos Foundation - The science and faith of theistic evolution explained.

What Darwin Never Knew
   
Reply With Quote
  (#15) Old
Alate_One Alate_One is offline
TOL Subscriber
 Alate_One's Avatar

 

Reputation:
Alate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peersAlate_One is well respected by his peers
June 25th, 2012, 09:47 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by HisServant View Post
And that has ZERO chance of ever getting passed through congress... it would be political suicide for both democrat and republican alike.
Well if the court strikes down the mandate only and nothing is done the insurance system will be destroyed and you'll have to go single payer.

"Obamacare/Romneycare" was a conservative response to single payer. By fighting against it, you're going to force single payer on everyone (an ACTUAL government takeover of healthcare).





“We do not believe in God because we need to explain this or that feature of the world. That is what science is for. We believe in God because we see something deeper in the world, something that transcends the scientific explanations.” - Karl Giberson Ph.D.

Some of the Evidence for Climate Change

The Biologos Foundation - The science and faith of theistic evolution explained.

What Darwin Never Knew
   
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
Copyright ©1997-2012 TheologyOnLine

Logos Bible Study Software Up to 15% OFF FOR THEOLOGYONLINE MEMBERS! Study twice, post once.
Logos Bible Software —take your Bible study to the next level.