Recent content by JudgeRightly

Bob Enyart gave this example (specifically with regards to how miracles produce unbelief) or close to it (I don't remember if it was two of his boys or just an analogy, so I'll just reproduce it as best I can): Two brothers are playing, and the older one says let's go inside and have the...

True.

Alex Jones ruined his reputation (at least for me) with his takes on the Sandy Hook shooting. https://kgov.com/alex-jones

As @Clete said, it's called entrenchment.

No. You are still confusing an absurd caricature with an unstated exception. The issue is not whether newborns and five-year-olds differ. The issue is whether you have any clear, objective, non-arbitrary principle for your exception. You still do not. No, you have asserted it multiple times...

Was listening to this just now and around 10 minutes in it got me thinking, what if instead of it just being pushed out by the sheer pressure, it was also pulled via electrical force: That, along with this video: Makes me wonder if the electrical discharge from the flood was enough to...

Oh, and if you're going to mention me or anyone else, do us the courtesy of actually quoting the post. That way the person you're referencing is notified, the context is preserved, and everyone can see exactly what was said. Don't paraphrase someone’s words loosely and then attack the...

So after refusing to read the answer, you now declare someone a “poor lost soul.” That is rich. You were given Scripture, explanation, and argument. You admitted you did not need to read it because you had already read the side you agreed with. That is not “finding heresy.” That is answering...

MadeByJimBob does have a bit of a potty-mouth though...

Lol, hour and four in, and Dr. Garret just completely concedes the debate topic! Hahahahahahahahahahaha!

As of about an hour in, I will say, MadeByJimBob does seem to lose his temper a couple of times in the debate. It's not a good look for him, even if his position is structurally sound.

@VladtheDestroyer I wonder what your thoughts are on this debate... Personally, I think Chris (whom I'm personally acquainted with) won the debate against Matt Slick. (Though, I might be biased, haha.)

His opening was mostly about the Transcendental Argument for God, which is q very strong position to start with.

Correct. It says “infinite understanding.” It does not say “infinite knowledge,” and it certainly does not say “exhaustive settled foreknowledge of every future free act.” Knowledge is information. Understanding is an ability. They cannot be the same thing. A man can possess information...