Recent content by JudgeRightly

Assimilation IS measured. Maybe not with a ruler or a clipboard in every case, but it is measured. It is measured by whether someone understands and can speak the national language. It is measured by whether he adapts to the culture. It is measured by whether he integrates into the surrounding...

I almost missed this. I already tried granting that for the sake of argument earlier. Suppose your removal system could exist. Suppose the constitution could establish it. Suppose the procedure could be written down. The same structural questions still remain: Who operates it? Who judges...

You're talking to someone who runs on "feelings."

Fine. Remove “invading soldiers” if that bothers you. The point remains. Illegal aliens, tourists, foreign students, temporary workers, foreign criminals, and foreign nationals arriving unlawfully by boat are all subject to American law while physically present here. That does not make them...

You could answer my questions, for starters. That would move the conversation forward. The repetition is happening because you keep retreating back into your position instead of answering the arguments that have been advanced against it. I have not merely repeated, “I want a king.” I have...

Small shrubbery, actually, and looks like it's western or southwestern US, which is more arid. Less grass.

Women shouldn't be cops, or at the very least, frontline or beat cops.

Oh brother! :ROFLMAO:

Then make the argument yourself. Yes. I am not denying what the Court held. I am denying that what the Court held is constitutionally sound. Those are not the same thing. Courts can be wrong. A ruling can be binding under current law and still be wrong as a matter of constitutional meaning...

One of these things is a protected act. The other is not. Racism is bad, m'kay? But even worse is the woman defecating in plain view of God and everyone.

It's called the first amendment, Anna. So long as they aren't committing a crime or breaking any laws, they have the right to peaceable assembly, even if they have disagreeable opinions or beliefs. Or what, do you think certain opinions should be criminalized? You might want to go read "1984"...

The same woman who was videod defecating on public transportation and has a somewhat long criminal record with multiple prior arrests?

No, you haven't. Otherwise I wouldn't be repeating them. Clete, all you've been doing is repeating your position over and over again, exactly like you demand others not do (and rightly so). This is me telling you, STOP REPEATING YOUR POSITION as though it advances the conversation. It doesn't...

Your system may solve it for an evil king, but not for the people who may remove him, nor does it guarantee that a king will always be good. That's the entire point! All you've done is moved the problem up a level at best! At worst you've created an entire legal process that has to be followed...

I think a distinction needs to be made here. One can be an American on paper, have all the proper legal documents, live here, raise a family here, etc, but if they dont share the same moral framework of "America," whatever that may be, then they are not truly "Americans" except in name only...