Turbo:
Jefferson has been answering your questions in a straightforward manner, despite your scoffing and putting words in his mouth.
Did I specifically mention Jefferson? No I didn't. And it is true, I generally don't get answers concerning difficult questions like what would happen to welfare and how single parents are supposed to raise their children, and that kind of thing.
Jefferson did answer my question regarding whether an unfaithful spouse would
have to be executed. I suspect then that hardly anyone would be because few people would feel like doing that to their errant loved one. I suppose it
might provide a `think twice' deterrent, particularly to those people who are in such bad relationships they couldn't be certain their spouse wouldn't push for maximum penalty. Oddly enough, this law will probably be more of a punishment to the independently wealthy, where avaricious spouses would have no financial impediments to life without hubby (and, it could be argued, a major financial incentive).
But I notice that my question regarding bad relationships and divorce hasn't yet been answered:
If you hated your spouse that much that you'd be willing to see them dead (even if they were unfaithful), you shouldn't be married to that person anyway.
I suppose that in Jeffersontopia, divorce would be practically impossible too. So imagine a home where things have broken down to the extent that both sides would be willing to turn the other over to the authorities if either were caught in flagrante delicto.
Neither side dares take the risk (although if one does, in most cases I suspect it would be the man). However, neither side can get divorced even though they hate the sight of each other.
You would prefer this? You would prefer to yoke them together for the rest of their lives? You think that's the environment in which children should be raised?
Also, what about the point I've raised again and again regarding the deadly combination of completely legalizing of all firearms united with the patriotic instincts of (presumably) a large number of citizenry? Those of us who believe that their first duty is to the Constitution of the United States, which expects us to defend the country against tyrants.
I have seen the argument made that the theonomy would be a more stable and safe environment. I fail to see how that would be possible in a lengthy civil war.