Jan 6 False Flag Op

Jefferson

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Since the libs on this forum will claim they don't want to waste their time on a half hour video, I've decided to summarize the first video in note form in order to take away their excuse.

Aren't I evil?

1 - Why no counter-protestors? There are ALWAYS counter protesters at MAGA events. Especially a MAGA event like this that had a lot of pre event notice about it. (Me: I've said my whole life that most adults lie like 5 year olds.)

2 - It’s pretty hard to “raid” the Capitol when the police invite you in (both through barricades and into the Capitol itself). The police would not let the protesters in unless they were ordered to let them in. Why were they ordered to let the protesters in?

3 - The “rioters” were not armed. How is someone supposed to overthrow the US government without any weapons?

4 - Why is there never a charge of Trump “advocating” violence, which is factually objective? There are only charges of mere “incitement” of violence, which is always subjective and based on emotionalism?

5 - Why were there such a limited number of police there in spite of advanced knowledge of a “raid”? Incompetence or proper planning to achieve the desired propaganda naritive desired?
 
Last edited:

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
Since the libs on this forum will claim they don't want to waste their time on a half hour video, I've decided to summarize the first video in note form in order to take away their excuse.

Aren't I evil?

1 - Why no counter-protestors? There are ALWAYS counter protesters at MAGA events. Especially a MAGA event like this that had a lot of pre event notice about it. (Me: I've said my whole life that most adults lie like 5 year olds.)

2 - It’s pretty hard to “raid” the Capitol when the police invite you in (both through barricades and into the Capitol itself). The police would not let the protesters in unless they were ordered to let them in. Why were they ordered to let the protesters in?

3 - The “rioters” were not armed. How is someone supposed to overthrow the US government without any weapons?

4 - Why is there never a charge of Trump “advocating” violence, which is factually objective? There are only charges of mere “incitement” of violence, which is always subjective and based on emotionalism?

5 - Why were there such a limited number of police there in spite of advanced knowledge of a “raid”? Incompetence or proper planning to achieve the desired propaganda naritive desired?
Thanks Jeff! I listen to these when I'm out walking and often bookmark half dozen of them to share here but don't always have the time to pull out key salient points.
 

annabenedetti

like marbles on glass
Since the libs on this forum will claim they don't want to waste their time on a half hour video, I've decided to summarize the first video in note form in order to take away their excuse.

I'll gladly claim I don't. Who has time to watch a bunch of half-hour to hour-long videos every day? I sure don't. Not only that, Youtube is more radicalizing than facebook and you guys aren't even aware you're being further radicalized.

As for "taking away their excuse," back on the day this thread was made, I posted a rebuttal in this thread to the idea of anyone other than MAGA and MAGA-adjacent insurrectionists attacking the Capitol and ok doser got a sympathetic mod to delete my post. Tell me why I should bother again?
 

annabenedetti

like marbles on glass
Antifa Jan.6 Provocateur

John Sullivan is considered an agent provocateur who's been nationally locked out of the BLM movement because they consider him dangerous to their cause. Among other things, they consider him: untrustworthy, a grifter, possibly working with his brother who's active pro-MAGA, a performative attention-hog riot-porn kind of guy. Universally mistrusted and blocked. Definitely not considered one of them.
 

Omniskeptical

BANNED
Banned
Qshaman eats organic food and is known paid paid actor protestor according to Heavy.com
John Sullivan is considered an agent provocateur who's been nationally locked out of the BLM movement because they consider him dangerous to their cause. Among other things, they consider him: untrustworthy, a grifter, possibly working with his brother who's active pro-MAGA, a performative attention-hog riot-porn kind of guy. Universally mistrusted and blocked. Definitely not considered one of them.
After or before the fact? and link maybe?
 

Jefferson

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator

Jefferson

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator

Another Democrat-Media Narrative Goes Up in Flames: FBI Official Admits No Firearms Were Confiscated by Law Enforcement at Capitol Riot (VIDEO)


It turns out the “armed insurrection” at the Capitol building on January 6 didn’t involve any firearms.

The Democrats, their dishonest Big Media and Big Tech, and their ‘fact checkers’ claim the intrusion into the Capitol on January 6th was an ‘armed insurrection.’

Senator Ron Johnson on Wednesday asked top FBI counterterrorism official Jill Sanborn if law enforcement confiscated any firearms on January 6 during a Senate committee hearing on the Capitol riot.

Ms. Sanborn said that no firearms were confiscated at the so-called “insurrection.”

“How many firearms were confiscated in the Capitol or on Capitol grounds that day?” Ron Johnson asked Sanborn.

“To my knowledge we have not recovered any on that day from any other arrests at the scene at this point,” Sanford said.

Ron Johnson pressed for more information regarding firearms: “Nobody has been charged with an actual firearm weapon in the Capitol or on Capitol grounds?”

Sanford replied, “Correct.”

“How many shots were fired?” Johnson asked.

“I believe the only shots fired were the ones that resulted in the death of the one lady [Ashli Babbitt],” Sanford said.

There you have it. Another Democrat-media complex narrative goes up in flames.
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond

Another Democrat-Media Narrative Goes Up in Flames: FBI Official Admits No Firearms Were Confiscated by Law Enforcement at Capitol Riot (VIDEO)


It turns out the “armed insurrection” at the Capitol building on January 6 didn’t involve any firearms.

The Democrats, their dishonest Big Media and Big Tech, and their ‘fact checkers’ claim the intrusion into the Capitol on January 6th was an ‘armed insurrection.’

Senator Ron Johnson on Wednesday asked top FBI counterterrorism official Jill Sanborn if law enforcement confiscated any firearms on January 6 during a Senate committee hearing on the Capitol riot.

Ms. Sanborn said that no firearms were confiscated at the so-called “insurrection.”
But that one guy was armed with a buffalo hat with horns - those are scary enough to send Alexandria Ocasio Smollett into a huddled ball sucking her thumb and whimpering
 
Top