a whore for the republican party

[chrysostom]

a whore for the republican party

that is what they called me
who?
I will name them
rocketman, genuineoriginal, nick m
all christian right wingers
would you like a link?
they and others say the republican party supports abortion
and
they should know it is a lie
or
they are very stupid
so
I started asking them questions
who?
town and rusha who claim the republicans didn't fix the abortion problem when they had the chance
would you like a link?

so
in this thread
I will answer the questions they couldn't answer

 

[chrysostom]

what you need to know about what you need

what you need to know about what you need

what you need to know about what you need

1st you need control of the supreme court
2nd you need a republican president
3rd you need a filibuster proof senate
4th you need a republican congress
5th you need republican governors
6th you need a republican controlled legislature

we already have the last three
but
they are the easiest to get

in separate posts
I will explain why each of the six requirements are important
and
they will be linked to this post

 

[chrysostom]

1st you need control of the supreme court

1st you need control of the supreme court

1st you need control of the supreme court

this is where everything ends up
abortion
same sex marriage
etc
it will all be tested by the courts
if
it is important

in 2003
a partial birth abortion ban was passed by
a republican controlled congress
and
signed by
a republican president
and
it was approved at the supreme court by
five republican judges


Gonzales v. Carhart, 550 U.S. 124 (2007)





back to
what you need

 

[chrysostom]

2nd you need a republican president

2nd you need a republican president

2nd you need a republican president

in 1995
a partial birth abortion ban was passed by
a republican controlled congress
and
it was vetoed by
a democratic president

Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 1995

so you need a republican president
to sign any bill regarding abortion
and
to get conservative judges who will approve them

back to
what you need

 

[TomO]

Oh hush up, you torrid strumpet. lain:

 

[chrysostom]

3rd you need a filibuster proof senate

3rd you need a filibuster proof senate

3rd you need a filibuster proof senate

this is where it started
a democratic controlled senate blocked the nomination
Robert Bork Supreme Court nomination
it was about abortion

later they tried to stop another nomination
Clarence Thomas Supreme Court nomination
it was about abortion

democrats continued to block nomination of conservative judges
George W. Bush judicial appointment controversies
it is all about abortion

it only takes 41 democratic senators
to block anything the republicans try to do
the democrats have always had at least 45

back to
what you need

 

[Rusha]

a whore for the republican party

that is what they called me
who?
I will name them
rocketman, genuineoriginal, nick m
all christian right wingers
would you like a link?
they and others say the republican party supports abortion
and
they should know it is a lie
or
they are very stupid
so
I started asking them questions
who?
town and rusha who claim the republicans didn't fix the abortion problem when they had the chance
would you like a link?

so
in this thread
I will answer the questions they couldn't answer

Oh hush up, you torrid strumpet. lain:

 

[musterion]

Your haiku is always so unorthodox.

 

[genuineoriginal]

1st you need control of the supreme court

this is where everything ends up
abortion
same sex marriage
etc
it will all be tested by the courts
if
it is important

in 2003
a partial birth abortion ban was passed by
a republican controlled congress
and
signed by
a republican president
and
it was approved at the supreme court by
five republican judges


Gonzales v. Carhart, 550 U.S. 124 (2007)

_____
The justices of the 5-to-4 majority, all of whom were appointed by Ronald Reagan, George Bush, or George W. Bush, namely, Kennedy, Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, and Alito, rendered a ruling that has no moral component whatsoever and is merely regulatory. On page 30 at Section IV (A), these men optimistically suggest that, "The medical profession, furthermore, may find different and less shocking methods to abort the fetus in the second trimester, thereby accommodating legislative demand."
Our Christian leaders have misled millions into thinking this ban would prevent at least some abortions. In reality, pro-lifers volunteered, they made phone calls, and gave money, all to promote a ban that utterly lacked the authority to save even a single baby.
source
_____​

 

[shagster01]

As I've pointed out earlier, a republican put the judge in the Supreme Court that gave us the ruling on Row v. Wade.

 

[chrysostom]

partial birth abortion

Description

IDX first involves administration of medications to cause the cervix to dilate. Dilation usually occurs over the course of several days. Next, the physician rotates the fetus to a footling breech position. The body of the fetus is then drawn out of the uterus feet first, until only the head remains inside the uterus. The physician then uses an instrument to puncture the base of the skull, which collapses the fetal head. Typically, the contents of the fetal head are then partially suctioned out, which results in the death of the fetus and reduces the size of the fetal head enough to allow it to pass through the cervix. The dead but otherwise intact fetus is then removed from the woman's body.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Oh hush up, you torrid strumpet. lain:

...

I don't think a godless Libertarian like you who votes for a pro abortion party platform and pro abortion Libertarian candidates has anyplace in a pro life thread Tom.

Regarding Sandy and her supposed pro life credentials:

Shall we review what your President (did you vote for B. Hussein Obama once or twice Sandy?) has done for the baby murdering movement?

President Barack Obama’s Pro-Abortion Record: A Pro-Life Compilation

Read more: http://www.beliefnet.com/columnists...o-abortion-record-a-pro-life-compilation.html

 

[TomO]

I don't think...

There's your problem. lain:

 

[PureX]

a whore for the republican party

that is what they called me

Well, I disagree with their using the term "whore" relative to your being used by the republican party. A whore gets paid for being used and abused by men with money; you're doing it for free. So you would be more like a republican party slut, then a republican party whore. :chuckle:

 

[Rusha]

Uh oh. Way to go, PureX. He will be whining about this for months.

 

[WizardofOz]

I don't think a godless Libertarian like you who votes for a pro abortion party platform and pro abortion Libertarian candidates has anyplace in a pro life thread Tom.

Regarding Sandy and her supposed pro life credentials:

Shall we review what your President (did you vote for B. Hussein Obama once or twice Sandy?) has done for the baby murdering movement?

President Barack Obama’s Pro-Abortion Record: A Pro-Life Compilation

Read more: http://www.beliefnet.com/columnists...o-abortion-record-a-pro-life-compilation.html

Um, acw...you're on record as being pro-choice. I don't think a godless fraud like you who would prefer an 11-year-old rape victim abort has anyplace in a pro life thread Connie.

being against legislation that requires an 11 year old rape victim to carry the baby to term, is entirely different than legislating laws that give sexual deviants certain rights such as 'marriage'.

 

[Rusha]

I don't think a godless Libertarian like you who votes for a pro abortion party platform and pro abortion Libertarian candidates has anyplace in a pro life thread Tom.

Regarding Sandy and her supposed pro life credentials:

Shall we review what your President (did you vote for B. Hussein Obama once or twice Sandy?) has done for the baby murdering movement?

Um, acw...you're on record as being pro-choice. I don't think a godless fraud like you who would prefer an 11-year-old rape victim abort has anyplace in a pro life thread Connie.

Oh yes. I remember it well.

Obviously the two Libertarians above know nothing about moral relativism, as being against legislation that requires an 11 year old rape victim to carry the baby to term, is entirely different than legislating laws that give sexual deviants certain rights such as 'marriage'.

And since we're on the topic of embarrassing oneself Aaron, how would voting for a pro abortion Presidential candidate such as Gary Johnson and the pro abortion Libertarian Party Platform that you voted for in the last election (and if Jr. had been out of diapers, stated he would had vote for as well), somehow put a stop to abortion?

And how does voting for the Libertarian Party Platform that promotes immoral acts such as homosexuality, pornography and recreational drug use, just to name a few, make you some kind of Godly person that is able to judge someone who has the best interest of society and in this case an 11 year old girl who was traumatized by 20 filthy ragheads and very well might take her own life if told she had to carry the baby to term?

Inquiring minds need to know.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

what you need to know about what you need

1st you need control of the supreme court
2nd you need a republican president
3rd you need a filibuster proof senate
4th you need a republican congress
5th you need republican governors
6th you need republican controlled legislators

we already have the last three
but
they are the easiest to get

in separate posts
I will explain why each of the six requirements are important
and
they will be linked to this post

I've pointed out in another thread that

Congress can override Supreme Court rulings like Roe v Wade and Lawrence v Texas.

...All along, there has been a third strategy that has gotten precious little attention: the power granted to Congress in Article III, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution to limit the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court:

The supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.

It’s one of the numerous checks and balances in our Constitution. When any branch of our federal government strays from its constitutional authority, the other branches have the authority and responsibility to keep that branch within its bounds...
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4053535&postcount=2197
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4053593&postcount=2199
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnew...congress-has-the-power-to-overturn-roe-v-wade

Of course that would mean that people of faith would have to become politically active and nominate and later vote into office traditional family values (pro life, pro decency) candidates.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Speaking of godless Libertarians:

Um, acw...you're on record as being pro-choice. I don't think a godless fraud like you who would prefer an 11-year-old rape victim abort has anyplace in a pro life thread Connie.

Having laws in place to protect a mother's life isn't being pro abortion Aaron.

Now you and Sandy can share your strategy on how voting for pro abortion/anti family candidates like Gary Johnson of the pro abortion /anti family Libertarian Party and Barack Obama of the pro abortion/anti family Democratic Party is going to help decrease the 1.2 million surgical abortions done each year here in the US (those who take pills to abort their unborn baby are not included in that number).

 

[WizardofOz]

Having laws in place to protect a mother's life isn't being pro abortion Aaron.

Your pro-choice argument was based on the rape and the age not any imminent threat to the mother's life.

Nice try

If she is young and a victim of rape, you're pro-choice. It's on record in that thread.