ECT CATHOLIC VS PROTESTANT BIBLICAL INTERPRETATION
- Thread starter Cruciform
- Start date
The implication of this thread: "CATHOLIC VS PROTESTANT BIBLICAL INTERPRETATION"-
What scripture do you Romans cite, to "prove" that us "unlearned and ignorant men"(Acts 4:13 KJV), are not to interpret scripture, and that this must be left to a bunch of "ecclesiastic" clowns, in clown outfits, known us papa/pope Frankie, in conjunction with "The Magisterium," to set us country bumpkins straight? Chapter, verse.
What scripture do you Romans cite, to "prove" that us "unlearned and ignorant men"(Acts 4:13 KJV), are not to interpret scripture, and that this must be left to a bunch of "ecclesiastic" clowns, in clown outfits, known us papa/pope Frankie, in conjunction with "The Magisterium," to set us country bumpkins straight? Chapter, verse.
Which is unbiblcal? Both. There is nothing in scripture about how to interpret scripture so, by definition, neither can be biblical. How, then, is one to understand what is in scripture? On their knees.
Questions or Comments?
Hi and reply to Gal 2:14 " If thou being a Jew , liveth after the manner of GENTILES , and not as do the Jews , why COMPELLEST thou thr GENTILES TO LIVE AFTER THE JEWS and I will answer ANY verse for you , IF YOU ASK ME TO !!
DAN P
brewmama
New member
LOL! Mine says the same thing!
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
Questions or Comments?
:chuckle:
HisServant
New member
Questions or Comments?
Did you notice the slight of hand?
It is the Holy Spirit that is THE interpreter... not councils or individual interpretations.
This just goes to show you how pagan the RCC is... they have removed God from the equation.
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
See post#1.
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
See post#12.
genuineoriginal
New member
Questions or Comments?
The catholic church interprets the Bible the way the Pharisees did.
The protestants search the scripture the way the Bereans did.
Cruciform
New member
Given that your claim here rests entirely on the 16th-century Protestant assumption of sola scriptura---and since the notion of sola scriptura is itself completely unbiblical (and so directly refutes itself)---your claim here merely falls flat.
Cruciform
New member
Paul is here writing specifically to Timothy---a bishop of Christ's Church. Are you, then, a bishop? No? So much, then, for your (mis)application of the biblical text.
Cruciform
New member
None of that, however, actually engages with the content of the OP.
So my claim that we should turn to God in prayer to understand His will falls flat. Your position is that we should trust a council of men to better understand God's will than God Himself. Would you care to differ with that?
Cruciform
New member
It is the Holy Spirit by means of the conciliar teachings of Christ's one historic Church. According to Jesus himself, the two are one and the same (Mt. 28:18-20; Lk. 10:16; Ac. 16:4; 2 Thess. 3:4; 1 Tim. 3:15; 1 Jn. 4:6).