ECT ST. AUGUSTINE ON THE TRUE CHURCH FOUNDED BY CHRIST

Cruciform

New member
13413754_1180594658657514_5319782509760300746_n.jpg
 

Nick M

Black Rifles Matter
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Galatians 2

7 But on the contrary, when they saw that the gospel for the uncircumcised had been committed to me, as the gospel for the circumcised was to Peter
 

Crucible

BANNED
Banned
I've read St. Augustine's works, and though he was a Catholic priest back in the 4th century, he certainly wouldn't have agreed with the fanatics of the Church calling themselves infallible, the 'only true Church', or, at that, even the best Christians.

The Roman Church became after Augustine a mass of tyrannical fanatics. You can't wash away a permanent stain with honeyed words, the RCC failed to 'deliver the kingdom', murdered people with a cross, scapegoated on it's own servants, and matched every single description of the Antichrist in Revelation.

So put a sock in it- Augustine was a predestinarian, something which Catholics abandoned and which Protestants restored.
Only to be challenged by idiots, but that's neither here nor there- the point is that the RCC is nothing more than a collection of whatever it can take to empower it's position.
 

Sonnet

New member
I've read St. Augustine's works, and though he was a Catholic priest back in the 4th century, he certainly wouldn't have agreed with the fanatics of the Church calling themselves infallible, the 'only true Church', or, at that, even the best Christians.

That's what the Roman Church became after Augustine- tyrannical fanatics. You can't wash away a permanent stain with honeyed words, the RCC failed to 'deliver the kingdom', murdered people with a cross, scapegoated on it's own servants, and matched every single description of the Antichrist in Revelation.

Put a sock in it- Augustine was a predestinarian, something which Catholics abandoned and which Protestants restored.
Only to be challenged by idiots, but that's neither here nor there- the point is that the RCC is nothing more than a collection of whatever it can take to empower it's position.

Not sure there is anything worse than a denial of Christ's death for all without exception - an assault on the very Gospel itself...a fifth column catastrophe, no less.

If we are to judge by human failures, then no denomination would survive.
 
Last edited:

Cruciform

New member
...St. Augustine...certainly wouldn't have agreed with the fanatics of the Church calling themselves infallible, the 'only true Church', or, at that, even the best Christians...Augustine was a predestinarian, something which Catholics abandoned and which Protestants restored.
:darwinsm:... You've been laughably deluded by your preferred recently-invented, man-made non-Catholic sect(s). It is a simple and straightforward documented fact that St. Augustine was fully Catholic in every sense of the term, a bishop and scholar who believed, taught, and passionately defended the following distinctively Catholic doctrines, among others:
  • baptismal regeneration
  • Christ's Real Presence in the Eucharist
  • the divine authority of Tradition, equal w/ Scripture as Divine Revelation (God's word)*
  • infant baptism
  • the primacy and authority of the papacy
  • the role of good works in salvation**
  • papal and apostolic succession
  • the 73-book biblical canon
  • the intermediate state of purgatory
  • the invocation of the intercession of past Saints (Communion of Saints)
  • the religious use of sacred images and objects in worship and devotion
  • verbal confession of sins to a priest for absolution
  • the Mass as a genuine sacrifice
So much for your sect's cockeyed imaginary take on St. Augustine.


__________
*Thus, Augustine utterly rejected sola scriptura.
** Thus, Augustine utterly rejected sola fide.
 

Cruciform

New member
Are there true believers outside Catholicism?
Yes, there are those who truly believe in Jesus Christ and have been properly baptized. In this way, they have been sacramentally connected to the Catholic Church, and so may in the end be saved.
 

Cruciform

New member
Which scripture in particular?
Every biblical text that refers to "the church" or "Christ's body," etc. is speaking about one---and only one (Mt. 16:18; 1 Tim. 3:15)---historic Church, that is, that one historic Church founded by Jesus Christ himself himself in 33 A.D., which still exists today, and which has been commonly known since the end of the 1st century as "the Catholic Church." This is a historically documented fact.
 
Last edited:

Sonnet

New member
Yes, there are those who truly believe in Jesus Christ and have been properly baptized. In this way, they have been sacramentally connected to the Catholic Church, and so may in the end be saved.

Since you accept non-Catholic believers exist then you refute your own claims about your church.
 

Sonnet

New member
Every biblical text that refers to "the church" of "Christ's body," etc. is speaking about one---and only one (Mt. 16:18; 1 Tim. 3:15)---historic Church, that is, that one historic Church founded by Jesus Christ himself himself in 33 A.D., which still exists today, and which has been commonly known since the end of the 1st century as "the Catholic Church." This is a historically documented fact.

Nothing here that puts the Catholic Church in authority. The church would be the body of genuine believers.
 

Cruciform

New member
Good works are not a consideration in attaining righteousness - scripture is explicit on this.
Yes, no doubt your preferred recently-invented, man-made non-Catholic sect has told you this. However, the biblical reality is that, while Paul specifically condemns the "works of the law" (i.e., the Mosaic Law) with respect to salvation, he also insists on the necessary role of "good works" (acts of mercy and obedience) in salvation (Rom. 2:6-11; 1 Cor. 9:23-27; 15:10; Gal. 5:6-7; Phil. 2:12-13; Heb. 5:9). Note, however, that I'm talking about ultimate salvation, not initial justification.
 
Top