Will Taiwan be destroyed by China while Biden remains silent?

Right Divider

Body part
Well certainly if we invade a state in order to liberate it, it will be against the will of the government we are toppling. LOL .
You think that it's so funny to destroy other nations.
Actually, it is true. We ARE the good guys. (Or, we were, until a couple of years ago and the woke Marxists.)
That you cannot see the evil "leadership" is all nations is sad.
Yes, I hear that a lot. Exactly how has any president ever profited from liberating a country.
The president does not (or at least legally) act unilaterally to start a war. It takes lots of "leaders" for that.
Trump came the closest when he said we should have taken Iraq's oil for our own. But we didn't. So how has any president ever profited from liberating a country.
:rolleyes:
 

Right Divider

Body part
We do when it becomes a threat to our economy, and when doing so will liberate a people from unjust rule, especially when such people is showing signs of Stockholm Syndrome for their tyrannical leaders.
It's easy for someone, anyone, to claim that "so and so country is a threat to our economy". That leaves the door wide-open to abuse of power.
 
You think that it's so funny to destroy other nations

Actually, we may be the only nation ever to spend billions on smart weapons that avoid needless casualties. In WWII we carpet bombed and nuked. Now we blow up precise addresses on a street where the actual target is. We went into Iraq but did not really destroy anything where the average people live their lives.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
It's easy for someone, anyone, to claim that "so and so country is a threat to our economy".

Straw man. We're not talking about the countries being a threat, we're talking about what was HAPPENING to those countries.

Communism is, indeed a threat to ANY economy.

Saving people from communism is a good thing.

We went to stop the spread of communism, and succeeded, despite not preventing Vietnam from becoming communist.
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
Straw man. We're not talking about the countries being a threat, we're talking about what was HAPPENING to those countries.

Communism is, indeed a threat to ANY economy.

Saving people from communism is a good thing.

We went to stop the spread of communism, and succeeded, despite not preventing Vietnam from becoming communist.
Ho wasn't a communist idealogue. And Vietnamese "communism" wasn't and isn't anything like that in China or the USSR.
Ho was willing to align himself with anybody who would help him break the bonds of French colonial oppression in order to achieve independence. He didn't particularly care what kind of government they ended up with, as long as it could be manipulated into a single party government, which is what most of the governments in that area had been historically. Usually ruled by a king or an emperor. They weren't then and aren't now interested in the mess that democracy produces. Stability meant more to them than individualism.

A similar dynamic was at play with regard to Russia/USSR. The kulacks and the serfs valued stability more than individualism. Understandable when the prospect of starving to death is a daily cloud over your head.
 
Last edited:

marke

Well-known member
All those African countries look the same to me too. 😁
Obama has traveled to 3rd world countries in Africa, as well as to 57 American states on the mainland.

trumpdonald_070117getty.jpg


 
Last edited by a moderator:

Stripe

Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Yes, Taiwan is doomed to fall to totalitarian communist tyrants because they know Biden does not have any interest in defending Taiwan from the fascist murderers. China owns the Bidens because the CCP has funnelled millions into the bank account of Hunter Biden's "Big Guy."
Yeah, because Taiwan has no hope of ever defending itself against the vast nation of China. That's why China has spent 70 years plotting to invade, but never has.

🤨
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
Yeah, because Taiwan has no hope of ever defending itself against the vast nation of China. That's why China has spent 70 years plotting to invade, but never has.

🤨
In 1960 Taiwan's population was about 10 million.
China's about 670 million.

If Mao had only Chiang Kai-Shek to worry about, he would have gladly sacrificed 10 million red Chinese to reclaim Taiwan.
 

Stripe

Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
In 1960 Taiwan's population was about 10 million.
China's about 670 million.

If Mao had only Chiang Kai-Shek to worry about, he would have gladly sacrificed 10 million red Chinese to reclaim Taiwan.
If the people of any nation should know that population counts do not translate into military success, it should be the US.
 

Omniskeptical

BANNED
Banned
If the people of any nation should know that population counts do not translate into military success, it should be the US.
65 times the population does not mean 65 times the military. Still it looks tempting to use an atomic bomb on china to cut losses. I don't like how they have updated their missiles.
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
I am an inch away from asking God to lay waste to it all. I am so sick and tired of evil liars among us. From the White House to this very forum. I am so done with it all.
So, Little Lord Fauntleroy has had enough and is about ready to blow his top, is he?
 
Yeah, because Taiwan has no hope of ever defending itself against the vast nation of China. That's why China has spent 70 years plotting to invade, but never has.

🤨

For most of those seventy years they did not have the capability to invade. In recent years they did but they always knew that we would step in. Now we likely won't step in. I am pretty sure that is the point of the thread.
 

Stripe

Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
For most of those seventy years they did not have the capability to invade. In recent years they did but they always knew that we would step in. Now we likely won't step in. I am pretty sure that is the point of the thread.
A US intervention will mean very little to whether a Chinese invasion would succeed. The onus is always on the defending nation.
 
A US intervention will mean very little to whether a Chinese invasion would succeed. The onus is always on the defending nation.

I must disagree in this case, because ultimately a flotilla of troops like D-Day would ne needed to literally invade, and we could easily sink them all with stealthy submarines, plus air power.

Hitler could have thwarted DDay if he had just moved his troops from Calais to Normandy, and those were just land troops on the shore. We have far more than that.


I am an inch away from asking God to lay waste to it all. I am so sick and tired of evil liars among us. From the White House to this very forum. I am so done with it all.
So, Little Lord Fauntleroy has had enough and is about ready to blow his top, is he?

I am sure I am twice as old as you as 20 times the man you are tranny soy boy.
And when God lays waste to everything, it is you and your ilk who will be crying and whining the most, just like you do now..
 
Last edited:
Top