How can Christians honestly believe dinosaurs roamed the earth hundreds of millions of years ago when by secularists' own test methods dinosaur remains have always been found to be less than 50,000 years old?
-
This is a new section being rolled out to attract people interested in exploring the origins of the universe and the earth from a biblical perspective. Debate is encouraged and opposing viewpoints are welcome to post but certain rules must be followed. 1. No abusive tagging - if abusive tags are found - they will be deleted and disabled by the Admin team 2. No calling the biblical accounts a fable - fairy tale ect. This is a Christian site, so members that participate here must be respectful in their disagreement.
Dinosaurs are fake and leads to atheism!
- Thread starter Ktoyou
- Start date
Atheists see a fossil and conclude, as Nicolas Steno did nearly 500 years ago, that those fossils must surely be old or how else would they have gotten themselves embedded in rocks. Steno, like modern secularists who think fossils are millions of years old, either did not know the Bible, did not understand the Bible or did not believe the Bible.
Dinosaur remains are found by the thousands in frozen Alaskan muck. What do you think they were feeding on at the time they were suddenly covered by muck which froze them in place?
There was a major extinction event that occurred as a result of the universal flood of Noah's day. Atheists see the evidence of the massive extinction event in the geological record, but they cannot adequately explain it in spite of stupidly insisting there was never a universal flood.
Your grass is not evolving into some higher or intelligent life form like idiots believe by stupid blind atheistic faith that human life evolved from plants and other biological matter.
Secular radiometric dating depends on a series of assumptions that have never been irrefutably proven true. Just like computer programming, if you design or calibrate measuring methods using garbage assumptions your date results will be garbage.
Natural selection is a theory that can no more be proven than God can be proven by human observation and measurement.
"Interminably long periods of time" are essential to 'proving' evolution possible, as George Wald once said.
George Wald on Time as the Magical Hero of the Plot
GEORGE WALD, "THE ORIGIN OF LIFE," SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, AUGUST, 1954, P. 45
The important point is that since the origin of life belongs to the category of at-least-once phenomena, time is on its side. However improbable we regard this event, or any of the steps it involves, given enough time, it will almost certainly happen at least once. And for life as we know it, with its capability for growth and reproduction, once may be enough. Time is the hero of the plot … Given so much time, the impossible becomes possible, the possible becomes probable, the probable becomes virtually certain. One only has to wait; time itself performs miracles.
George Wald
Another quote:
“When it comes to the origin of life there are only two possibilities: creation or spontaneous generation. There is no third way. Spontaneous generation was disproved one hundred years ago, but that leads us to only one other conclusion, that of supernatural creation. We cannot accept that on philosophical grounds; therefore, we choose to believe the impossible: that life arose spontaneously by chance!”
-- George Wald
Another:
Last edited:
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
See: Just So Stories by Rudyard Kipling
The 2nd law of thermodynamics assumes all energy 'evolves' toward decay, not increase. The sun is not getting younger or increasing in energy, it is getting older and tending toward decay and failure. Life is not increasing in development from simplistic ignorant life forms to more complicated thinking forms of life but is decreasing in intelligence, strength, and stability.
Entropy does not describe some future existence of evolved intelligent life but the dead end of all life on earth as we know it.
What is the second law of thermodynamics?
Endless movement between hot and cold will eventually mean the end of the universe
www.theguardian.com
Thermodynamics is the study of heat and energy. At its heart are laws that describe how energy moves around within a system, whether an atom, a hurricane or a black hole. The first law describes how energy cannot be created or destroyed, merely transformed from one kind to another. The second law, however, is probably better known and even more profound because it describes the limits of what the universe can do. This law is about inefficiency, degeneration and decay. It tells us all we do is inherently wasteful and that there are irreversible processes in the universe. It gives us an arrow for time and tells us that our universe has a inescapably bleak, desolate fate.
Adaptation is common in life forms as designed by God. Natural selection is a secular myth that attributes acts of God to atheistic powers such as natural selection, which is a mythical power secularists believe can effect design changes even though it has no power to think or act.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
Just for a lark I thought I'd check and see what the wiki entry said about Kipling's stories and I'm LOL'ing. Look at the last sentence in the entry.
Just So Stories for Little Children is a 1902 collection of origin stories by the British author Rudyard Kipling. Considered a classic of children's literature, the book is among Kipling's best known works.
Just So Stories
Kipling began working on the book by telling the first three chapters as bedtime stories to his daughter Josephine. These had to be told "just so" (exactly in the words she was used to) or she would complain. The stories illustrate how animals obtained their distinctive features, such as how the leopard got his spots. For the book, Kipling illustrated the stories himself.
The stories have appeared in a variety of adaptations including a musical and animated films. Evolutionary biologists have noted that what Kipling did in fiction in a Lamarckian way,[1] they have done in reality, providing Darwinian explanations for the evolutionary development of animal features.[2][3]
Just So Stories for Little Children is a 1902 collection of origin stories by the British author Rudyard Kipling. Considered a classic of children's literature, the book is among Kipling's best known works.
Just So Stories
First edition | |
| Author | Rudyard Kipling |
|---|---|
| Illustrator | Rudyard Kipling |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Language | English |
| Genre | Children's book |
| Publisher | Macmillan |
| Publication date | 1902 |
The stories have appeared in a variety of adaptations including a musical and animated films. Evolutionary biologists have noted that what Kipling did in fiction in a Lamarckian way,[1] they have done in reality, providing Darwinian explanations for the evolutionary development of animal features.[2][3]
If 99% of world leaders and geniuses refuse to believe the Bible then they are all fools for doing so. Never unquestionably believe what fools tell you.
Atheistic secularists are not interested in finding the truth. After reputable labs were tricked into testing dinosaur bones for age without knowing the bones were dinosaurs they yielded ages of less than 50,000 years. However, once they discovered the bones were dinosaurs they withdrew their test results and slandered the researchers who submitted the bones for testing. Why did the labs reject their own measurements? Because their measurements contradicted the secular assumptions about the ages of dinosaurs.
That is proof secularists will not accept facts if facts contradict known erroneous secular assumptions.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
I am a professional scientist, educated, trained and paid to do the job for 26 years, including different periods of time when I did original research funded by government grants. Even got myself published once.
In a totally unrelated subject, I found myself a couple days ago scanning through a scientific paper online and was amazed to find that I still could, at the level I used to.
The sun is burning out. The earth's rotation is slowing. Life forms get old and die. That is explained by studies related to entropy.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
As a former pre-med and having operated in the field of healthcare for most of my adult working life, allow me to point out that you sir, are a retard.
If the best you have is a lie, don't cling to it. Just let it go.
There are only two possible explanations as to how life arose: Spontaneous generation arising to evolution or a supernatural creative act of God.... There is no other possibility. Spontaneous generation was scientifically disproved 120 years ago by Louis Pasteur and others, but that just leaves us with only one other possibility... that life came as a supernatural act of creation by God, but I can't accept that philosophy because I do not want to believe in God. Therefore I choose to believe in that which I know is scientifically impossible, spontaneous generation leading to evolution.
George Wald
Philosophy, Believe, Years
We would not even have gravity if not for God. Atheists certainly cannot explain gravity or its origin if not for God.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
Are you familiar with Isaac Asimov's short story The Last Question?