Recent content by tieman55

According to Brown that would cause the water to go supercritical as it captured about 1700 years of heat below the surface. Then according to you and Brown it was released to the surface in two days, to judge man. Brown says it was 1/2 the water on earth was at that temperature, do you agree...

Then I will definitely not watch the video! You say that "you can't have any new miracles" and then you claim a new miracle, as the heat just disappears.

I am talking "only" about "Walt Browns Hydroplate theory" and I quoted him, in his book. 1/2 of all the water on earth is "750 to 800 degrees F "according to his Hydroplate theory" and it is all released into the atmosphere in just a couple of days. the ONLY cooling effect it will have is...

Walt Brown "Temperatures increase with depth inside the earth, Subterranean water abut 10 miles deep would have been extremely hot" RE: SCW "The initial pressure in the 10 mile deep subterranean chamber was about 62,000 PSI.... After centuries of of tidal pumping, the subterranean water...

You can separate the waters hot and cold and still wipe out man if he becomes too evil.

God is not adverse to risk, that is for sure!

When gas or liquid expands it absorbs heat but the heat doesn't go away 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics, the heat is just dispersed to a wide area, making it worse for the heat problem. The earth at the time of the flood, according to HPT was lush, it was warm much warmer than today. That...

Half the water on earth at over 7-800 degrees F is a heat problem. Half the water on earth at over 7-800 degrees F (those are Walt Brown's numbers) released into the air and water over a few days, That is 23. sextillion Btu's, that is a heat problem. I never claimed that there is anything...

Overall, Brown’s Hydroplate Model is the best to date model and it is solid. But it has problems, to much heat is one, Enyart acknowledges as much talking about the heat after the flood Enyart says "the canopy as one that also has" a heat problem. Another problem is "leaky" as Dr. Baumgardner...

Great catch. raqia, Hoba was hammered and it looks like it was.

Johann Kepler looked at what is and then explained what he read in the Bible. I am just looking at Hoba and then explaining what I read in Genesis 1:6 and elsewhere. Hoba is what it is, and it was never in space. Hoba is an alloy, an alloy that is today found in the mid latitudes in...

The below post was copied and pasted from deepAI. I added the bold to note what I found most interesting and what I believe points to Hoba being a piece of a dome. (The question I asked was prompted by an earlier response from AI that mentioned "hydrothermal alteration" in Hoba) deepai.org Q...

Hoba has no Widmanstatten patterns? That further sets Hoba alone and very different. It also, I think gives clues to other meteorites origin. I believe there is a strong correlation between meteorites with Windmanstatten patterns and their documented impact on earth. Documented means, they...

Hoba has no "fusion crust" which sets it alone, fusion crust happens when the iron-nickel alloy gets hot on reentry. Those who pretend that Hoba had a soft slow landing have a big problem with this one. The temperature and the speed of a meteorite upon re-entry are inversely proportional...