Search results

So, you think God is a bad writer? He talks about Adam's need for a help meet, goes off on a tangent about animals then comes back to the help meet agenda? Someone is abandoning plain interpretation of writing for interpretation by contortion.

The mean age is 50.1. An older group means more sickness and death regardless of vax status. Remember they got sick and/or died after the vax not of the vax. No mechanism of action via the vax is isolated. This is a barrage of all health issues. At age 62 your risk of dying of something...

Fun fact: statements can vary in the degree to which they contradict each other. Look at five accounts of a gunman entering a classroom. The students statements might not align, there will be some consistencies. The verbiage will not pair up in neat binaries. The man had two weapons. The...

Not: I will see if there is a help meet among what I have created. Why not? the animals were created after him.

So, when was Eve created in the sequence? Why does it seem she is just another piece of help meet created after the animals and clearly after Adam? Why didn't God know ahead of time that the potential help meets didn't meet help meet standards?

The answer lies in the scholarly translation of what was actually written and passed down, not in anyone's attempt patch up things in their favor on some website. Is that agreed?

The jargon of formal logic studies is not what happens on TOL. We use the definitions of lay people. Sometimes we may interject a concept from logic theory, but we do not pretend we have been using it all along. Well, except you.

Nice try at a save. I am not buying it. The context clearly suggests that the creatures were formed for Adam. There is grammar that would make it clear. It would say the animals that had been formed from the ground. It does not say that!

Just driving home that if every fowl and beast were formed at that time, Adam existed before every fowl and every beast. It sure sounds like God formed them specifically to help Adam.

Thank you. First thoughts: 2.9% had adverse events 1 to 21 days after vaccination. Some of these events are expected to happen regardless of vax status.

Sure does. Okay, but that is not what happened here. I would wager two stories by different authors were jammed in together. No, it says every fowl and every beast was formed from the ground not brought forth from what was previously created.

You have real issues with semantics and logic. Two absolutely false things can contradict each other. Like two false alibis. Stripe can say you were with him playing basketball, while JR says you were with him reading the Bible, but you were really off on your own with your laptop murdering...

But a platitude becomes meaningless because of overuse. What I say is halfway original how ever useful you think it is.

I think ffreeloader has tapped into the reality that people die. Everyone who took the vaccine will die, and so will everyone who did not. I knew that already.

I never hit on your links as I do not need any Russian Malware. If you will post excerpts or provide terms I can google to arrive there independently, I will consider it.

Me. The risk is insignificant

In the second story, humans were created before the other animals.

In the second story, humans were created before the other animals.

2First narrative: Genesis 1:1–2:3 3Second narrative: Genesis 2:4–2:25

A literal understanding of the Bible strains credulity. Contradictions abound. Order of creation is contradicted. Matthew's account of the resurrection of Jesus includes resurrection of several others who walk from their graves to the city. No one else makes mention of it. How did they miss...