Search results

In fact, I'm going to go so far as to claim the entire track of Bob's study of Romans 2 as evidence for my position. I'm still listening to it, and more and more I'm considering how what he says applies to this topic, and seeing it fit.

Ok, so I'm just going to respond to the parts I know how to respond to. If I miss something that you think is important, let me know in the reply. This is similar to what I believe, in part because Bob taught it, and not only that, but also because he gave evidence for it that is scriptural...

As for the bill itself... It's completely moot. It's simply rearranging the deck chairs on the titanic as it's sinking. Children should not be taught that sex is a matter of choice. A person is either male or female from the moment of conception. It is child abuse to teach children that they...

Every single person involved in this deserves to be executed. The teachers who promoted the "gender identity" brainwashing, the government officials who made it legal for such brainwashing to be taught, the officials who accused the parents of abuse, the officials who "intervened," the rapists...

Does it come with human piloted mechs and transforming space jets?

Reminder that callout threads like this one are not allowed, and haven't been since 2016. https://theologyonline.com/threads/about-callout-threads.33001/

Already done, more than once. Stupid doesn't make you sin, Arty. Sin makes you stupid, and you're probably one of the stupidest I've seen.

You're in denial.

You really are dense if you think we ever said otherwise. ALL OF THEM, Arthur! THEY ALL DO. They are ALL evidence, testimony, to the fact that you want criminals such as murderers and rapists to walk free. I explained why in posts 44, 47, and 49. You really are really dense!

No, you're not. Then you should have addressed that when you first came here. Neither is you making the same straw man against ancient Israel. You regurgitating the same claim as if that settles the matter isn't helping you or anyone. Hey, leave bread out of this! Please quote anyone...

Don't forget to confiscate the money too! Because it can be used for crime too! Especially by the government... Oh wait...

How is that any different than what I said in my post? Why? Is not two or three witnesses, as God requires, enough to convict? In other words, are you calling God a liar? I'M ALL FOR THAT! Not needed. One fallible human is enough, better even, than multiple. Of course, if he wants to...

Redirection. Stay focused. Genesis 4:22 "Two or three witnesses" is not a rigid parameter, Arthur. How many times do we have to tell you that until we beat it through your thick skull? No, it wouldn't, as explained previously. Judges alone are the only ones who have the right to appeal a...

And you're the sole determiner of that? What was that about one witness not being sufficient to establish a matter again? Oh, right! “One witness shall not rise against a man concerning any iniquity or any sin that he commits; by the mouth of two or three witnesses the matter shall be...

Your loss. Because it allows me to thoroughly dismantle bad arguments such as yours. Good for you. It was so obvious, I'm not sure how you got to the point where you denied that the ancients had evidence, testimony, reason, and logic. Typical Arty. Doubles down when he's shown to be...

Excellent point!

You stated and then asked: To which I responded: You then said: So what context am I not recognizing when I challenged you on your answer, which was a denial that they had evidence, testimony, reason, and logic, by saying: How are you not trolling or just plain stupid? I can read just...

... is only using his brain, of which you have half, and using logic and reason to eliminate non-possiblities, based on the evidence. Saying it doesn't make it so. Only to you, because you have no argument, and don't want to let reason persuade you of the truth. He's not wasting anyone's...

They didn't have evidence, witnesses, logic, and reason? Now I KNOW you're trolling. Or just plain stupid, I can't tell which. So "eyewitnesses" and "circumstantial evidence" don't qualify as evidence or witnesses? Got it. And they didn't have logic or reason? Got it. You apparently think...

The same thing we have today. Evidence. Testimony. Logic. Reason. You still seem to be arguing something other than what we're talking about. You say "two or three witnesses" is not good because we have more reliable way of discovering evidence. I'm not seeing the correlation. Having more...