Search results

You missed one: [1Pe 1:3 KJV] Blessed [be] the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, which according to his abundant mercy hath begotten us again unto a lively hope by the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, Here it is in the ESV: [1Pe 1:3 ESV] Blessed be the God and Father of our...

Hey, Bradley, can you quote who or what post your comment was directed at? I doubt anyone would disagree with what you said, but perhaps I didn't realize I said something against it.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/01/buttigieg-says-he-was-shocked-how-controversial-it/ Don't they know it is called "black top"?

Yes. Yes, because it is talking about this: Ephesians 2:5 KJV — Even when we were dead in sins [not alive], hath quickened us [made us alive, which is what being born is all about] together with Christ, (by grace ye are saved) Yes Romans 10:9-10 KJV — That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth...

Everybody faced with death needs to be born again with the life-giving Spirit.

Some of them used to post here.

I think this sums up this whole thread.

You seem conflicted. The concrete reality is apples. There are four of them (you know because you count them). But the concept of "4" existed before the apples, without being concrete. When the apples first dropped to the ground is NOT when "4" was created. You knew about "4" long before that...

"Years" requires a planet going around a sun, one of which didn't exist when you are supposing that "time" first began.

You shouldn't tell him that. He's trying to be careful of his brain cells.

Yes, this is probably tangent to the main point of the thread. @JudgeRightly I read this today: Micah 1:2-6 KJV — Hear, all ye people; hearken, O earth, and all that therein is: and let the Lord GOD be witness against you, the Lord from his holy temple. For, behold, ***the LORD cometh forth out...

"Root" is a traditional girl's name?

"Highest" good? Doesn't that mean there's a "lesser" good, or even a "not good at all" alternative? Are you unable to define love without appealing to alternatives? Hmmm.

Better to say, if there's a before, then creation of it (time) had to be earlier, but that puts its creation before creation of the heavens (space) and earth (us). Yet that means something was created on day zero (or earlier), and therefore not everything was created in 6 days, despite Moses'...

I've looked at this thread once or twice, but haven't gone through every post. I think the intent is to separate time from things that were created. Thus, the following doesn't apply to time: Colossians 1:16-17 KJV — For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth...

It will have an albino gorilla.

Yes, to a degree. Yes, but not necessarily what a man will do, as per Abraham's almost sacrifice of Isaac. Only if you reject some of the evidences for open theism. Two, and even three, witnesses can lie, as per much of what is going on in the J6 trials, the Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping plot...

Right, that's what I said. Which I didn't say, and therefore I don't understand why you are arguing against it to me. So, how does He confirm something He didn't witness and is not available for Him to ever know again (events that happened in the past)? He CAN'T do it by going down to Sodom...

Part of their understanding, yes, but not part of the definition. Love is patient, but you don't have to not be "impatient"? Love is kind, but it's ok to be unkind? Love does not boast, except when it does boast? The definition doesn't have to include the not-opposite, though it does in...