Search results

Why don't you give us specific biblical arguments as to why we should assume that Genesis 1 and 2 should be taken as you believe it was intended?

That is your opinion. You could be taking the Bible in a way that God did not intend... :cool: For example, when it says in Psalms that the trees clapped... should we assume that this literally happened? Should we not assume that this was spoken with hyperbole? Many view the Genesis...

Expecting God to give great scientific details on how He created would be like expecting a brain surgeon to tell his young son details of how he operates. God's focus and concern was on the theology of it all. GC

BTW, Hugh Ross is a true Astrophysicist, and well-respected in the field. GC

Incidentally, the big bang is strong evidence for creation. It indicates clearly that the universe had a beginning... by some power outside of space and time, and with incredible power. I agree with the Berean about Ken Ham. BadDog

The foremost scientists, who are believers, are not the ones listed. Ken Ham Kenneth Alfred Ham is an Australian born Christian fundamentalist, young Earth creationist and apologist... He has but a bachelor's degree. Walter T. Brown is a young Earth creationist, who is the director of his own...