Search results

Afraid of the search. This exact question and answer has been given thousands of times in my time here.

I know. You reject God and will go to hell with granite, Rusha, Hitler, and Mother Theresa. God said this, but you say. When the Lord your God brings you into the land which you go to possess, and has cast out many nations before you, the Hittites and the Girgashites and the Amorites and the...

This looks like some child sacrifice ceremony in a fantasy/action movie of the 80s.

How about you open up the Bible and read it.

There is no such thing as an independent agency in the executive branch. If they are not legislators elected, or judges appointed, they answer to and work for the President. It has always been this way.

He knew it was unlawful. I have connected the dots for you to clearly see. The point being, there isn't a new church in Matthew 16. You might say in Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, he is clearing out his church. Separating the sheep and the goats, or at least preparing them for when it comes. Try...

5 These twelve Jesus sent out, and commanded them, saying, “Do not go into the way of the Gentiles, and do not enter any city of the Samaritans. 6 But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. 7 As you go, preach, saying, ‘The kingdom of heaven is at hand.’ Or did you mean in the...

God can save anyone he wants. At any time. I go with what the scripture says. Don't you? He laid out the law for Israel.

Not quite. There is only circumcision and un-circumcision on earth. In Christ, there is no such thing. Those aren't our words, it is the scripture. 2 churches, not 3. Paul's letters and Acts of the Apostles bear out that there is a new church with different rules. Paul said he is the first saved...

Prison does not exist in the Bible as punishment.

Who or where is the executive authority of government? Where is it vested?

What was Nicodemus supposed to know? John records the same as Matthew, Mark, and Luke. The circumcision is to keep the covenant.

Paul was saved by faith alone. The covenant of circumcision requires keeping of the law of Moses. And yes, Paul was the first. It is to drive Israel to jealousy, but that is another topic and not the cross directly.

Speaking of things in the documents we use for justice, he was the one that voted (1-8) that a violent criminal should still have his arms. The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. The bigger issue is in play, but the concept is correct. If he raped, murdered and stole, he should...

Acts 10 happens before the rebuke by Paul. He knew just going there was unlawful, but God told him to do it. And if the boss says you, then you can. 27 And as he talked with him, he went in and found many who had come together. 28 Then he said to them, “You know how unlawful it is for a Jewish...

I didn't contradict anything. So, no.

I was on X on my phone. Most discussions with the RCC quickly moves to "sola scriptura" because their positions are indefensible otherwise.

Paul repeats certain things in letters. He reconciled the world, including his enemies at the cross. He is not imputing trespasses. But, you are not indwelt with the Spirit until salvation. You have eternal life when he seals us into Christ.

The responses never move past "It is obvious symbolism".