musterion
Well-known member
Maybe leftism didn't burn out all traces of motherly love from her soul.
http://thefederalist.com/2015/12/21/miscarrying-while-feminist/
http://thefederalist.com/2015/12/21/miscarrying-while-feminist/
Confused pro-abort feminist inexplicably sad over miscarriage
- Thread starter musterion
- Start date
musterion
Well-known member
You are pro abortion and a murderer at heart.
A stony heart (Eccl 10:2, Jn 10:10). Nothing wrong with the seed (Mt 13:3–8).
oly:
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
right
the CHOICE to murder an innocent child
right
they're against allowing people the choice to murder innocent children
shagster01
New member
That tends to happen when you get excited about something and it doesn't happen.
No, the horn isn't a "homo ". I believe in gay rights and equality for gay people. That's all . Being for civil rights for black people doesn't make you black , and being for animal rights doesn't make you a cow .
Like millions of other Americans, I believe the decision whether or not to bear a child should and must be between a woman and her doctor . None of us wants to force any woman to have an abortion . We also don't want to force women to bear children against their will .
When the government declares that "All pregnant women must give birth or else, " this is tyranny of the worst kind . And it guarantees the deaths of so many of those women .
Like millions of other Americans, I believe the decision whether or not to bear a child should and must be between a woman and her doctor . None of us wants to force any woman to have an abortion . We also don't want to force women to bear children against their will .
When the government declares that "All pregnant women must give birth or else, " this is tyranny of the worst kind . And it guarantees the deaths of so many of those women .
What's inexplicable here is your illogical use of terms.
If she was indeed pro-abort, as you claim, the painful event of a miscarriage would have been preempted....would never have occured.
Your presupposed slur disqualifies your entire claim here.
Instead, what you have here is the essence of choice, a decidedly chosen effort to give birth and the woman's subsequent painful loss.
Nothing inexplicable about it....save for her personal anguish.
genuineoriginal
New member
Sure they are.
Pro-death would probably be a more accurate term.
Sure they are.
Murder of infants should never be a choice, especially infants that are still in the womb.
Pro-Birth is Pro-Life.
Your argument is that no body should be forced to not murder an infant, but that pregnant women, in a time of great hormonal flux, should be given the choice of murdering an infant?
Yes, you certainly are that.
I doubt anyone on here would believe you.
You believe a woman needs an accomplice to murder?
No, there are much worse kinds of tyranny.
The number of women that die from medically assisted abortions is still the same as the number of women that died from back-alley abortions, but the number of infants murdered is much greater.
cite.
GuySmiley
Well-known member
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9Vvfckoq8w
From the video:
Cecile Richards: "But your father was a rapist, wouldn't you rather be torn apart and have your head crushed? Well, unless we can sell your head that is."
Baby: "Um no."
I see no "recent survey" here.
musterion
Well-known member
Which is why Peter Singer and his fan club believe they should be legally killable after they're born too.
Genuine original, the number of women who die every year from LEGAL abortions is only a tiny fraction of the ones who died from illegal back-alley abortions before Roe v Wade .
A woman has a greater chance of accidentally drowning while taking a bath than from dying from a legal abortion .
Every year all over the world in poor countries where abortion is illegal, thousands of poor women die from botched illegal abortions .
If these countries legalized abortion and made it easy for women to obtain contraceptives, the abortion rate would PLUMMET !!!!
Fact : More abortions happen in countries where it is illegal than in those where it is legal .
Every time a country has made abortion illegal after it had been legal,
the abortion rate has SKYROCKETED !!!!
A woman has a greater chance of accidentally drowning while taking a bath than from dying from a legal abortion .
Every year all over the world in poor countries where abortion is illegal, thousands of poor women die from botched illegal abortions .
If these countries legalized abortion and made it easy for women to obtain contraceptives, the abortion rate would PLUMMET !!!!
Fact : More abortions happen in countries where it is illegal than in those where it is legal .
Every time a country has made abortion illegal after it had been legal,
the abortion rate has SKYROCKETED !!!!
That's interesting. What is even more interesting is that you left out the fact that approximately 57.5 million babies in the U.S. have been aborted since 1973.
Most of these abortions would have happened anyway . Anti-choicers always make it sound as though there would be 50 or 60 more million people in America now if abortion had remained illegal . They are deluding themselves !
Well, some of the women who had abortions might not have had them, but we would have have had an awful lot more hungry,
poor, abused and neglected children than we do today , and many of those poor children would have died from abuse, hunger and neglect .
Well, some of the women who had abortions might not have had them, but we would have have had an awful lot more hungry,
poor, abused and neglected children than we do today , and many of those poor children would have died from abuse, hunger and neglect .
This Charming Manc
Well-known member
Lets face it the unreasonable parts of both sides to this debate like to use terms to vilify the other.
The pro life stance is based round the sanctity of life and not any anti woman agenda.
The pro choice stance is based round the belief in personal freedoms, and not nay enjoyment about abortion.
They are two conflicting rights that both cant be met. I am unsure how a sane person can think one persons right to complete choice trumps another persons right to life. It strokes me as insanity.
However your insistence on misrepresenting the alternative arguement and naming calling only suggests to me you have no faith in your argument that the mother right to choices trumps the baby's right to life?
The pro life stance is based round the sanctity of life and not any anti woman agenda.
The pro choice stance is based round the belief in personal freedoms, and not nay enjoyment about abortion.
They are two conflicting rights that both cant be met. I am unsure how a sane person can think one persons right to complete choice trumps another persons right to life. It strokes me as insanity.
However your insistence on misrepresenting the alternative arguement and naming calling only suggests to me you have no faith in your argument that the mother right to choices trumps the baby's right to life?
That's a bunch of nonsense. A cop out.
A million average of abortions per year in the US alone- and turning a blind eye- is not 'pro-choice'. That is 'pro-travesty'.
Nobody needs to make a caricature of feminism, it does it all by itself. It is a mass of myths, lies, self-loathing, and man hating. No amount of a feminists being sweet or soft changes the wolf under that wool.
And that's what you got, at the very best- you got a myriad of freaking Hermione's basically imagining inequalities and injustices that do not exist and because they exhibit an innocent vibe about them everyone eats it up.
And at the very worst......
:rotfl: