A punk maybe, but one who would easily take stripe or 6 days or anyone else here to the cleaners in debate, without calling Ad Hominem's or engaging in logical fallacies.
Stuu cleverly argued the point not the person. Compare that to the nominal:- ":mock: Stoo" standard of debate......
Why do you think they persistently use minor excuses to give him lengthy bans?
ETA: Not that Stuu has ever complained about that. We all know and accept how the rules are often interpreted :think:
Dear Hedshaker,
Wow, I said Church and everyone scattered! What gives? Even Stuu would not be troubled by it. How long before he'll be back, WizardofOz?? Do you know? I know that he blasphemed the Holy Spirit the last time he got banned. He just doesn't know what he's saying will get him into trouble. But to him, blaspheming the Holy Ghost is okay, because he has no idea who the Holy Ghost is and doesn't know that Jesus said not to do that. He is completely ignorant and innocent this time. It's paragraphs and words that he's never heard before. So, I really don't know what to tell the mods. Stuu doesn't know that he's doing wrong, of course! Stuu does not know what is in our Bible. He's not guilty of anything as far as doing something that he has read is wrong.
Bring Stuu Back!!!
Michael