LOL. Well, the left doesn't consider those rights to actually be rights so they didn't extend those rights to rivers. But, that doesn't really matter. Ever seen a really "angry" river misbehaving? It makes antifa and blm look like little kids playing with wet matches when it comes to property destruction.
Right to free beer?
Well, I think the beer would be so diluted it would be like drinking.... Water. I think rivers have enough of that, unless that is they have a dry riverbed. As to the right to bare arms I have yet to see a river cover it's "arms", i.e. tributaries.
if a river has human rights and it floods and destroys property and causes the death of humans, can it then be held responsible in a court of law and imprisoned?
Human rights AND responsibilities.
Don't you know that the socialist left doesn't approve of criminal punishment? If anyone on the left gets jailed for property destruction Kamala bails them out of jail. Oh, how out of touch you are.
The socialists don't believe in that second word. We have no responsibilities other other than to believe what the socialists say. You're just as out of touch as ok. I take it you've been neglecting your required reading of the mockingbird media.
Yes.
I hate to tell you this but our banks are already bankrupt. The Fed and the government has already bankrupted us. Rivers seem to be immune to being "bank"rupted. When they get out of the banks they often excavate enough soil to create new banks within which to run.