:rotfl:
yep, it shows i dont suffer from liberal or white guilt, and that i am honest and do not practise hypocrisy. I am more than willing to be "discriminated" against and wont force others, im not fascist like you.
Mississippi lawmakers approve religion bill amid gay-rights protests
- Thread starter Angel4Truth
- Start date
yep, it shows i dont suffer from liberal or white guilt, and that i am honest and do not practise hypocrisy. I am more than willing to be "discriminated" against and wont force others, im not fascist like you.
I had just posted that I agreed with you but then I re-read part and saw this.
Section 3, part 1, letter c.
| Makes any decision concerning the sale, rental, occupancy of, or terms and conditions of occupying a dwelling or other housing under its control, based upon or in a manner consistent with a sincerely held religious belief or moral conviction described in Section 3 of this act. |
Could not a religious organization that runs a shelter say that a single mother goes against their belief that sex is restricted to marriage?
exminister
Well-known member
Well the bill will certainly be good for the lawyers. Everybody is gonna sue.
It does permit an establishment to deny service to a single mother. Section 2b. Sexual relations must be in the confines of marriage.
I don't see it calling out charities. But would expect it to be implied.
It does permit an establishment to deny service to a single mother. Section 2b. Sexual relations must be in the confines of marriage.
I don't see it calling out charities. But would expect it to be implied.
The most people in this day who are bigoted are atheists.
If you came down off your ivory towers and set aside your amplifiers, you might realize the irony.
You all haven't done nothing but harass the religious and converted about half the planet's oxygen into carbon dioxide with your yapping and whistle blowing.
For nothing. Because a picture of Jesus causes 'irreparable damage to mental health', or someone believes in traditional, natural marriage so you try to sue them and take down their businesses.
glorydaz
Well-known member
Let me guess. You're an idiot. :banana:
glorydaz
Well-known member
:rotfl:
yep, it shows i dont suffer from liberal or white guilt, and that i am honest and do not practise hypocrisy. I am more than willing to be "discriminated" against and wont force others, im not fascist like you.
Just imagine..... I live in a world full of these liberal fools. It's why I stay home with the horses...they have more brains.
Sure, its possible, but im willing to bet that caveat is to keep fags from suing christian bed and breakfasts.
genuineoriginal
New member
The pendulum has swung far into sexual immorality, with same gender marriages and all, so why are you objecting when the pendulum starts to swing back the other way?
genuineoriginal
New member
FTFY and you are welcome.
I didn't mean that the single mother/shelter scenario was the intention behind that part of the bill but it sounds like a shelter could do it if they wanted to.
Maybe, but then if you were a single mother, would you even seek shelter at westboro bapist church for example?
Is there such a thing as a right to charity also?
:idunno: Maybe it's the only shelter I can access.
Not sure what you mean. I'm not aware of a specific 'right to charity' but can charities discriminate based on the protected classes of people?
If they arent government funded, yes.