31 Reasons To Reject The Jab

[Idolater]

It means that the determination of whether to impeach or not can be made on issues greater than just the facts of the offense.

OK. So it being 'political' due process means that Congress has the power to decide that even if the president did commit crimes, to not attempt to indict? Whereas any other prosecution must enforce all the laws, they do not have the power ("discretion") to just not prosecute?

The power to impeach is necessary in order for our balanced powers to actually balance. There must be an absolute power in one branch against another branch, and impeachment is that absolute power that Congress possesses against the other two branches (and against members of Congress themselves I suppose).

Since the power to impeach is patently constitutional, the power to not impeach isn't a violation of the liberal institution of 'rule of law'. This apparent violation of rule of law is actually needed in order to preserve the regime 'through thick and thin'.

So, considering the impact on the country and the impact on one's own career is fair game.

It's an absolute power, but it's within our liberal institution (which is explicit in our liberal institution of having a written constitution) of 'separation of powers'. So absolute power exists in our regime, but our regime is not absolutely powerful.

 

[Skeeter]

OK. So it being 'political' due process means that Congress has the power to decide that even if the president did commit crimes, to not attempt to indict? Whereas any other prosecution must enforce all the laws, they do not have the power ("discretion") to just not prosecute?

That is my interpretation. It also refers to the fact that, the decision cannot be appealed to the Supreme Court.

The power to impeach is necessary in order for our balanced powers to actually balance. There must be an absolute power in one branch against another branch, and impeachment is that absolute power that Congress possesses against the other two branches (and against members of Congress themselves I suppose).

Since the power to impeach is patently constitutional, the power to not impeach isn't a violation of the liberal institution of 'rule of law'. This apparent violation of rule of law is actually needed in order to preserve the regime 'through thick and thin'.

It's an absolute power, but it's within our liberal institution (which is explicit in our liberal institution of having a written constitution) of 'separation of powers'. So absolute power exists in our regime, but our regime is not absolutely powerful.

Did you write this?

 

[Idolater]

That is my interpretation. It also refers to the fact that, the decision cannot be appealed to the Supreme Court.

Thank you.

Did you write this?

Yes, why.

 

[Skeeter]

Thank you.

Yes, why.

It is better than your usual.

 

[Idolater]

It is better than your usual.

lol. No it's not. It's all water from the numerically same well.

 

[Skeeter]

lol. No it's not. It's all water from the numerically same well.

There is some giggly juice and urine down in under there.

 

[Idolater]

There is some giggly juice and urine down in under there.

So I know your doctorate isn't in rhetoric anyway.

 

[way 2 go]

Trump ordered the vaccines to be made and he expedited the approval process for vaccines, and he murdered trillions of people in the USA alone as a consequence.

so you and trump recommend the vax

 

[User Name]

so you and trump recommend the vax

All sarcasm aside, Trump's vaccines have, by and large, worked to prevent serious illness and death for millions of people. Trump is right about the vaccines.

 

[Idolater]

All sarcasm aside, Trump's vaccines have, by and large, worked to prevent serious illness and death for millions of people. Trump is right about the vaccines.

Yes and they have worked to give some kids and other youngsters pericarditis that they otherwise wouldn't have gotten. To be fair.

 

[User Name]

Yes and they have worked to give some kids and other youngsters pericarditis that they otherwise wouldn't have gotten. To be fair.

To be fair, there are unintended consequences with literally any medical treatment you can think of. People die from medications and surgeries all the time, but we still do medications and surgeries because they save far more lives than they lose. Likewise, on rare occasion, people do die from vaccines, but we still do vaccines because they save far more lives than they lose.

 

[ok doser]

Yes and they have worked to give some kids and other youngsters pericarditis that they otherwise wouldn't have gotten. To be fair.

To be fair, the manufacturers and the governments mandating these shots should be liable to prosecution

 

[User Name]

To be fair, the manufacturers and the governments mandating these shots should be liable to prosecution

To be fair, people who refuse vaccination and then check themselves into a hospital because they have covid should be liable to pay for all of their medical treatment out of their own pockets.

Or should they?

 

[way 2 go]

Fiesty Hedgehog (@fiestyhedgehog)

By the UK governments own figures, we have vaccine failure on every metric: 🤧 infections 🏥 hopitalisations ⚰️ deaths

nitter.net

 

[Idolater]

View attachment 2917

Fiesty Hedgehog (@fiestyhedgehog)

By the UK governments own figures, we have vaccine failure on every metric: 🤧 infections 🏥 hopitalisations ⚰️ deaths

nitter.net

In those 30 and older, it is always better to get your two shots and your booster than it is to remain unvaccinated.

You do see that in the charts, right? They're your charts.

 

[Jefferson]

To be fair, people who refuse vaccination and then check themselves into a hospital because they have covid should be liable to pay for all of their medical treatment out of their own pockets.

Or should they?

I'd go along with that provided that people who have spent their lives never exercising and eating mostly junk food, smoking, excessive drinking, etc., should also be liable to pay for all of their medical treatment out of their own pockets.

 

[User Name]

I'd go along with that provided that people who have spent their lives never exercising and eating mostly junk food, smoking, excessive drinking, etc., should also be liable to pay for all of their medical treatment out of their own pockets.

I thought you were against socialized medicine in all cases. No?

 

[way 2 go]

In those 30 and older, it is always better to get your two shots and your booster than it is to remain unvaccinated.

You do see that in the charts, right? They're your charts.

no
charts show vax failure , not comorbidity or underlying conditions

 

[Idolater]

no
charts show vax failure , not comorbidity or underlying conditions

Infection rate is unimportant when compared with hospitalization and death. I shouldn't have to state that. You should just know and accept it.

 

[way 2 go]

Infection rate is unimportant when compared with hospitalization and death. I shouldn't have to state that. You should just know and accept it.

so you admit not a vaccine.
(it is a gene therapy)

vax failure is the only thing that the chart shows

Bayer executive: mRNA shots are ‘gene therapy’ marketed as ‘vaccines’ to gain public trust​