Well, sorry, since the "main stream science" accepts sea floor spreading and uses magnetic striping as one of the bits of evidence, I think I'll wait for you to provide the "facts or logical doubts". Maybe you are correct, but I've never seen any evidence to support your position.
-
This is a new section being rolled out to attract people interested in exploring the origins of the universe and the earth from a biblical perspective. Debate is encouraged and opposing viewpoints are welcome to post but certain rules must be followed. 1. No abusive tagging - if abusive tags are found - they will be deleted and disabled by the Admin team 2. No calling the biblical accounts a fable - fairy tale ect. This is a Christian site, so members that participate here must be respectful in their disagreement.
Mainstream Science
- Thread starter Nick M
- Start date
Appeals to popularity are logical fallacies.
Don't use logical fallacies to prop up your position.
Reminder, the ball is in your court to provide evidence for your position, see post #39.
But you won't test it.... why?
Another fallacy: Appeal to incredulity.
Is all you have logical fallacies?
Right Divider
Body part
Someone was a poser from the start...
Uh, no. Even you know what those scientists who actually are involved in the study of plate tectonics/sea floor spreading take as evidence for their theories. You are the one raising questions. You therefore must have studied the issue as well and have evidence to support your objection. Let's hear it.
Right Divider
Body part
SFS is NOT evidence... it is a bogus THEORY about the evidence.
The mid-Atlantic ridge is much more likely to be tension cracks. The evidence supports that far better than SFS.
What a concept!
Again, it is YOUR claim that SFS occurs. YOU made that claim and have YET to provide ANY support for it.
Watch some of Bryan Nickel's videos on YouTube. He gives some very good presentations of Dr. Walt Brown's HydroPlate Theory:
Right Divider
Body part
Good for you.
Right Divider
Body part
Still not one sentence of support for SFS...
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
Now, that runs along the border of the mythical, sunken land of Creditcartha, which borders the kingdom of Agartha, right? Didn't they Discover it back during the war, while going under water with debth charges, in the Chase for U-boats?
Sounds about right from your side of the looking glass
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
Wait...have you and I talked before? Oh, I know what it is; it's that the way you write, you sound quite a bit like @Arthur Brain. Weird. In fact, so far as I can find using TOL's search feature as best I know how, you're the first person since @Arthur Brain to have used that "sounds about right..." form of sarcasm:
Interesting.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
There again, interestingly, your writing is peculiarly similar to a certain habit featured often in @Arthur Brain's writing. Your technically grammatically-incomplete "so..." clause is what caught my eye. Instead of "so it is a bit hard to evaluate", you cut corners by writing "so a bit hard to evaluate". @Arthur Brain does that a lot, too:
"so hardly exclusive to Wapo anyway..."
instead of
"so it's hardly exclusive to Wapo anyway..."
instead of
"so it's hardly exclusive to Wapo anyway..."
"so neither right or left in any meaningful sense"
instead of
"so he is neither right or left in any meaningful sense"
instead of
"so he is neither right or left in any meaningful sense"
"so all there to see"
instead of
"so they are all there to see"
instead of
"so they are all there to see"
"so kinda funny..."
instead of
"so that is kinda funny..."
instead of
"so that is kinda funny..."
Don't you find that interesting, @Avajs?