Clete's latest activity

I am quoting scripture. Do you deny that Paul baptized people as late as Acts 18 and 19? That is your doctrinal position. You don't get...

It is directly relevant! It's relevancy is explicitly stated in the question itself. I specifically quoted YOUR OWN WORDS to give the...

Why won't you answer my question?

You know if they are saved by what they confess. In a way you can come to a conclusion based on their behavior. But it is probably the...

My comments in post 3 are a bit of hyperbole, by the way. It isn't actually REGARDLESS of how confused the rest of one's doctrine gets...

I always immediately think of this verse for that context: 1Cor 3:15 (AKJV/PCE) (3:15) If any man's work shall be burned, he shall...

Repeating your position does not count as a response to the argument. If "Any other baptism is a distraction that diverts attention...

Perhaps, but human beings are very capable of holding multiple contradictory beliefs in their head. If he believes the gospel, as has...

How much later can it be than Acts 19? Just how much past the period of time covered by Acts are you thinking these latest instructions...

This question came up this morning and so I thought I'd post my thoughts here. It seems to me that most of the confusion surrounding...

My post didn't stop with Acts 9. Paul was baptizing whole families at once clear into Acts 18. If your argument is valid then Paul...

Well, of course it makes perfect sense. That's the reason it was the very first thing Paul did once having been filled with the Spirit...

I attended a seminar on "The Plot" where, at the end, Bob opened it up for questions. I asked him to comment about getting baptized. His...

Been there, done that. Church membership itself is unbiblical. The pit of disputed details seem to not have a bottom. No. In fact, it...

One major point I am making is that it seems to me that a lot of Mid-Acts people turn not getting water baptized into a form of...