Search results

Ironic. Anyone who's part of MAGA lacks any such to start with.

Hey, I'm not part of the MAGA crowd thanks...

That's about as hilarious as it is sad...

That was almost funny...

Nope, you don't.

Rather, I don't buy into some data you put up as if it's sacrosanct.

Anywhere that doesn't supply food, toiletries or medicine in context of a lockdown. I don't make light of the significant impact that such measures have on businesses, especially smaller ones either.

Um you might want to check your posts over for spelling and stuff before submitting them. There's always a time delay when any sort of lockdown happens, that's common sense. You might have convinced yourself that they're ineffective in which case it's pointless carrying on. Data says otherwise...

Thanks for the laugh! :ROFLMAO:

You mean non essential ones? Why do you think? Sure they do. If non essential stores are shut then people are going to buy items in supermarkets that they otherwise would have bought elsewhere, clothes, electricals etc. It makes absolute sense. Figures don't just magically fall the day a...

Well, people generally get their food and supplies from major supermarket stores anyway so lockdowns don't affect the volume of people doing their shopping. They're no more or less busy as they are during normal times. It should also be apparent that figures don't immediately go down once a...

How does that work exactly? Explain your reasoning.

The epidemic was real before lockdowns were even enacted. You're making no sense. Why do you suppose Trump finally got around to declaring a national emergency?

Here's some proof that Mike Lindell is completely out to lunch... https://uk.yahoo.com/news/mypillow-ceo-mike-lindell-mic-094227743.html

Um...yeah...this article sums it up rather astutely. https://uk.yahoo.com/news/trump-speech-cpac-enough-haunt-004630711.html

"CNN fake science?!" Oh, hey, the first places I go to for science are CNN or MSNBC! Oh, except they aren't. Sorry about that.

You're much like ffreeloader in some respects. You assert nonsense and then expect stuff like twitter accounts and far right blogs and the like to count as 'scientific evidence'. They don't. Then you 'cry foul' when actual data unravels all of the conspiracy rubbish.

I gave you an accredited source that you tried to "rebuff" with some silly twitter nonsense and else. I'm well aware of the effects that lockdowns have had on small businesses and that's not to be taken lightly along with plenty of other aspects of this pandemic but don't pretend that you're...

So where's this latest gem of incontrovertible evidence from? The same twitter account? Another one? You might as well get your "science" from WND...

So, some twitter account overrides actual scientific findings then. Got it.