Search results

Lechery has no component of mutual consent in any definition I've found. Like this from dictionary.com: "unrestrained or excessive indulgence of sexual desire." "Within marriage" is a restraint, therefore you can't be monogamously lecherous. It's back to that oxymoron problem, again.

You make it sound like the conscience is trustworthy. But if Christians need to "walk in the spirit" to produce love joy peace patience kindness goodness gentleness and self-control, how are non-believers going to be able to do those things? Artie said adultery might be permissible in some...

Then it shouldn't be too hard for him. Why would you not encourage him to search the scriptures?

That could be, I suppose.

I guess "dingbat" = "insane"?

I didn't know that about Artie.

Asking him to use the Bible to justify his position ended up getting him banned? I doubt that. It was always his response that he was responsible for. I'm not opposed to being called a dingbat, and I don't think what he did deserves a ban (@JudgeRightly). But the discussion was about what the...

I hope you're joking.

Sounds like you are advocating calling me a dingbat. :)

I asked a question, and that equates to advocacy?

Can you show me where I've advocated rape anywhere?

You're actually afraid to read the Bible, aren't you?

Show me with scripture.

You didn't answer my question. If he's "resorting" to forced sex, then he must have tried other things already. Are you suggesting the wife should first cause her husband to "resort" to forced sex, then kill him so she can remarry? That's a weird take on that scripture.

Why would a husband ever need to resort to forced sex?

Nope, not kidding.

Prove it. Surely you have a bible. If not, go to blb.org. They have several versions to pick from.

David stopped having sex with Michal after she derided his dancing. Was he right or wrong?

Adultery is indefensible too, don't you think?

You still haven't explained why your garbage is any better than Paul's.