Search results

Possibly. If they were blood borne at that time, they wouldn't have caused disease (diseases are a result of the Fall). At the very least, the pathogen Kinds existed.

The crucial point is that Christ was the passover Lamb. He was killed the same day that the animal lamb was being killed (probably at the same time), in preparation for the Passover, since they could not do any work on the passover, it had to be done before. Thursday crucifixion Friday Passover...

No, that was part of their original function. Pre-Fall. The answer is in the post you quoted.

Because we live in the present, and it's easier for people today to understand. Right, that's because it assumes a Friday crucifixion. I'm challenging that assumption.

He completed one of her ovum. At which point, the Second Person of the Trinity put on that human body (because human life begins at conception), and became a man.

Don't we all? They aren't. The ancients were certainly geniuses, but there's no reason to think that they were even aware of what goes on at the microscopic level, let alone being able to build and create things at that size. That's because they ARE manufactured. Not by humans, no, but by...

Because Friday was a high Sabbath (yearly), while Saturday was a normal, weekly Sabbath.

I have no idea what you're talking about. This is why I told you to step out of the Catholic tradition for a moment.

@rstrats here is the corrected timeline from the above ChatGPT link: Revised Timeline with a Thursday Crucifixion Wednesday Night (Beginning of Thursday by Jewish Time) - The Last Supper (Passover meal) is eaten after sunset (Luke 22:14-20, Matthew 26:26-29). - Jesus predicts Peter’s denial...

Step out of the Catholic tradition for a moment, Idolater. A Friday crucifixion doesn't work, because it doesn't align with the narrative and other corroborating details. The corrected timeline is at the end of this: https://chatgpt.com/share/67bb6375-12c0-8001-ba7a-91eb3e7cf1d7

Christ was crucified on Thursday, was in the tomb Friday and Saturday (both of those days were Sabbaths that year), and rose on the third day, Sunday.

I noticed you dodged the question. Here it is again: Can you please explain why things go DOWN, and not up, even when they lose mass?

Oh really? So if you boil some water in a kettle, and it starts boiling, and you put a piece of paper or paper towel or tissue over the spout, what happens to it? Does it start to be pushed up? You know, because of the pressure? Pressure that isn't in a container.... Huh, almost like you CAN...

I suppose you reject the claim "Scientists have created life in a lab" too, right? Because it goes against the "virtue" of the physics and chemistry of how such "life" (if it can even be called that) could come into existence? Or is that a special case where you ignore the fact that such "life"...

Make the argument, 1m1s. I dare you.

The Bible says nothing about the rope coming undone. God told us that he hanged himself and that he burst open in the middle. It doesn't say anything else. It doesn't need to.

He hanged himself. Which means there was something tall he had to use. He fell headlong, meaning instead of jumping feet-first, he likely let himself fall with the noose around his neck. The resulting whiplash killed him, and ripped him open, and his entrails gushed out as a result. I'm not...

Fail.

There are more molecules having the same elastic collisions above than there are below. You seem to have forgotten that a gas exerts pressure evenly against all surfaces of the container it is within. Pulling out the gas means there is less pressure on ALL surfaces, not just in whatever...