Search results

Caino Nathaniel wasn't the only one "shocked" by this Master's interpretation. I'm pleased to see that for the most part He agrees with much Catholic exegesis. tWINs

I believe the "original" language of the papers was english? "Both Job and his friends failed to find the true answer for their perplexities". I especially like that Christ has updated His lexicon to 1940's idom. And all this time I thought that Jesus had said He would establish His Church on...

I certainly agree with the sentence saying Christ is with us now (presently most clearly in the Church He established) but I don't hear or read Christ in the "words in red" that seem to imply that these were His actual words? tWINs

I'm still impressed that Jesus sounds very much like a semi-early modern father of the Church giving a sermon. tWINs

UA seems to miss the even more enlightened concept of "three personalities in one" as the ultimate example of Love. Has UA missed the fact that God most supreme attribute is love? tWINs

Truth is even more serious. tWINs

Two no in a row. Can we go four three. tWINs

If I can use my "retro" enlightenment I'll interpret that as a no. tWINs

So xrta enlightenment offers no improvement to our present moral situations? tWINs

So what is the UP's position on human cloning? On artificial contraception and conception? on the "just"wage etc.? tWINs PS With all the xtra revelation available I'm sure it will be far more enlightened than Catholicism.

That still leaves "calling Christ your Lord" your main mantra. If you put your "other" realms, your other "streams" your other "guru's" before Him than you are a good man but a delusional one. Christ called Himself "the way, the truth and the light" do you put "others" before Him? tWINs

Well thats silly, since the communion is 'spiritual' in nature and 'God' is incorporeal in essence, no matter what form we 'touch' him thru And so we come to the "splitting" of the ways. Is UP right in further revelation (along with Protestant splitters) in that there is no transubstantiation...

The "further" revelation is changing the "original". Two opposites cannot be true. The "seers" can contradict "the Fathers" but when they do ...give me the Fathers. I'll take the "old" road and you take the "new" road. I just might get to Scotland before ye. tWINs

Pretty difficult to "enhance" and "enlarge" perfection. A God who lays down His life for His friends out of love? He now returns minute by minute as each mass reaches consecration time. He is consumed with love for those who consume Him. Others scoff and laugh saying "If you are really...

But you forget...even with your own teaching we are not talking "buggy whips" or anything physical. We are talking of "love" and as far as I know, that along with hope and faith, which will end with time, only "love" will last eternally. Does "U Papers" shed "new" light on love? tWINs

And the "above" is why Christ promised to be with His church throughout the ages. There was a saying if it's not broke don't try to fix it. The Church's action are not always kosher but her teachings are true. I can't vouch for the "U Papers". tWINs PS I'd think its the essence, quality and...

I'm happy to read that Jesus keeps up with "modern" expression. tWINs

An excellent quote and right on target. Notice how Peter given the keys to a Church that will live on through the years. This is the Church that should be reincorporating any new insights into its structure. You seem to have uncorked a similar but slightly new and improved (to enlightened...

You might find the Catholic method of detecting seers as a useful tool. After one claims to have seen Mary etc. he or she is questioned and examined. If what is privately revealed goes against already revealed and accepted dogma...it is thrown out. I think your book and its purveyors should...

because the "cork" on your "bottle" lets all the credibility built up over the centuries leak out. We now have "seers" looking back and refuting the interpretations that have kept the ship in the bottle on a true course. tWINs