Search results

All you have is denial. As explained in the videos from the relevant people brought along on TFE, the 24-hour sun in Antarctica PROVES that the earth is not flat. I repeat: the earth CANNOT be flat, and still have a 24-hour sun in Antarctica during the southern summer. The 24-hour sun exists...

Yes, He was. He has existed for all of eternity, because He's God. If he wasn't God, then He would be a liar, and not trustworthy at all. But He IS God, thus He has always existed. I understand what you're saying just fine. I've understood it just fine. But it's wrong. It goes against what...

Almighty does not mean "omni-potent," "having all power." It means "the highest power." It's the position at the top in terms of power. Calvinists conflate this position with the idea that one having the most power means he has ALL power. It's a non-sequitur. Plus, God delegates power to His...

No, you nor we don't. You're conflating general knowledge predictions of the future through relationships, with the pagan Greek concept of infallible foreknowledge. For all you know, (which is exactly the point), RD could (God forbid) die tomorrow, in a car wreck. In other words: Saying it...

The argument is against infallible foreknowledge, Idolater. Not "foreknowledge" in general. No one is saying God cannot, with great accuracy, predict the future, and far better than we can. What we're saying is that God does not infallibly know that that future that He predicts will come to...

Supra. Well that's clear as mud! Thank you. Man-made, as opposed to God-breathed, like Scripture was. The contents of the Bible were established as soon as scripture was finished being written. As for "who" decided, God did, and: What advantage then has the Jew, or what is the profit...

That's not the kind of knowledge that is meant by "God knows all things infallibly." Thanks for establishing my point. Whatever that's supposed to mean... Would you care to define it? Another term that has absolutely no meaning to me... So....... A man-made work that claims to detail what...

Yes. BEFORE He became a man, He was in heaven, fully God. He didn't have the name Jesus yet. He was known as the Word. You keep repeating this. But repeating yourself isn't magically going to make what you say come true. Yes, we are. The LOGOS BECAME FLESH. The LOGOS is the same person...

Now I'm almost certain you're @keypurr. He was in his 80s, and preached much the same message as you.

Now this is the kind of toilet humor I can get behind!

Thank you for suffering through it for us!

Yes He was. The LOGOS became flesh. That's literally what "incarnation" means! HE BECAME A MAN! Because it's false! Jesus IS the LOGOS! He was in heaven with His Father prior to the incarnation! Do you have a problem with object permanence or something?

I'm just embarrassed for her every time I hear her.

BBCode allows for posting code. Use the [ CODE ] and [ /CODE ] (without spaces) to post code. There's more, but you're better off seeing what you can do on the BBCode help page: https://theologyonline.com/help/bb-codes/

I wouldn't be able to sit through it even at 3x speed. And that's only ~20 minutes of video.

I'm not THAT old!

Fix your formatting, please.

Red X? Circle? (Check the image you uploaded to make sure it's the right one!)

Because Luke had a very analytical mind. He was a physician. He wanted to present the events of the first century in an orderly manner. Luke was his first book. Acts was his second book. Acts picks up where the other three gospels than his leave off. Again, without Acts, Paul's epistles would...