Search results

Nice letter. Shame he didn't know how planets form. Physics entirely explains it. The planetary nebula only has to have an overall rotation in one direction. As you have increasing gravitational attraction from a contracting star, the collapsing planetary nebula conserves its angular momentum...

Magic, of course. As a creationist, that's how you 'explain' everything. The magical intelligent moving hypothesis. If you are going to talk about 'atheist' science, then you will have to accept proper explanations for how things really work. Are you ready for that shock? Everything is in an...

Your man there thinks the lunar eclipse, which of course is the earth coming between the sun and the moon, was caused by a fourth celestial body hovering over the North Pole. Of course he is right that there needs to be something between the sun and the moon, and it has to be a sphere because...

Here's Kyrie Irving giving a narrative: He is telling us about his early years in Australia, during which NASA and the Australian government conspired to tell young children that they lived in something they called the 'Southern Hemisphere', highlighting the callous disregard for basic human...

Here's Andrew Flintoff, who is the narrator this time: He is explaining to the BBC Test Match Special commentators that when those condensation trails in the sky behind him go pink at sunset along with those wispy clouds, it is not because of any 'sunset', but because NASA has banks of red...

It makes all the difference in the world. I can't believe you are just ignoring the well-characterised narrator effect. This calls into question everything you have posted in this thread. Stuart

Here's the narrator effect in action: Mr. O'Neal, the narrator in this case, is pictured in front of a horizon that is clearly photoshopped, as demonstrated by the difference between the appearance of he horizon in the photo and the words coming out of his mouth. Clear as day. Stuart

Go back and look closely and you should be able to see the narrator effect clearly. Sheesh. Stuart

But you still aren't factoring in the narrator. Watch what happens if I include his photograph: See now? Stuart

You should know full well that the identity of the narrator alters the rate of drop with distance. How could you have made such an amateur mistake with this? With Hawking narrating, it's about 5 feet per nautical mile. That's an important difference. I think you should come clean about this...

It sounds to me like the brainiac narrating it was Stephen Hawking, one of the most serious braniacs of the 20th Century. Maybe NASA paid for his wheelchair and so he stayed quiet about the conspiracy. Stuart

You think there is maybe a giant fish forming an obstruction, perhaps? Probably there are NASA employees out there every day on that lake feeding those giant fish. Stuart

And I guess the telescope was pointing up in the air when the helicopter was hidden, too. Stuart

Here's a crushing video: Stuart

New thread: The seas are green. Government agents have had tiny colour filters implanted in all newborns' irises since 1924 that turn the true green water colour blue. Stuart

That's both mad and paranoid. Well done! Stuart

Is there a single topic in the universe about which you aren't intentionally ignorant? You are the most articulate ignoramus I have ever encountered, I think. And what about all the evidence presented to you? Your cherry-picking has been sufficient to produce a single-serve fruit pie for every...

Patrick Jane's lengthy meme images are wearing out my scroll wheel. I reckon he could shout us all new mice. Stuart

It sure does. For example, some citation linking the bonkers claim to the copy-paste from the Holy Wikipedia. Stuart

Mad. Utterly bonkers. Stuart