Search results

Oh dear. :sigh: Physics. Explain why the Earth is flat from pure physics. We can explain why the Earth is round. :up: If you ask: Why is the Earth round, we are not going to give you "reasons to believe." We will tell you why. It's like if we were to ask why fire is hot. We would not give...

Is reading your second language? M&M's work showed an orbital velocity of 8kms. Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

This is not the scientific method. We have theories (round Earth, conservation of angular momentum) and evidence to support it (pendulums, M&M). You have your rejection of our ideas. To be part of a sensible conversation, you need to provide the same things. You could start by explaining why...

:darwinsm: Clete is right. You're stupid beyond belief. :chuckle: Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

M&M measured an orbital velocity of about 8 kilometers per second. Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

OK, well, you said the answer was in OP. It's not. So it looks like you're a liar. Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

Who? I notice that twice now you have refused to engage regarding the fundamentals. I know the answer to the base question on our side. What is the answer on yours? Why is the Earth flat? Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

Pass. The number of people who believe a thing really is irrelevant, not to mention boring beyond belief. Ask them. You seem to think they're everywhere. The only one I can find is you. :idunno: But pictures from NASA don't count, because... reasons. :idunno: No, it's not worth any time. As I...

So we can just insult Dave instead of entertaining this nonsense? Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

I've never seen the two of us in the same room. :think: Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

Hi. :) Which firmament? ;) Check out this post: Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

He thinks NASA is his enemy. :Plain: The conversation is a waste of time solely because Dave declares himself a non-believer in the flat-Earth myth. It's bizarre because he then defends their ideas without a hint of irony. If this were a serious scientific debate, we would look at the...

No. Let's read it sensibly. :up:

This is an irrational response. That things are debated is not to conclude that they must be difficult. Try responding rationally. When the Bible talks about the four corners of the Earth, it is simple to see that this is not to be taken literally. Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

:rotfl: Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

It's pretty simple. It's just reading. For instance, when the Bible talks about the four corners of the Earth, that's not literal. Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

Ah. There's your problem. Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

Are you going to defend every idea? Big deal. :idunno: There's no debate on this site about a lot of stupid ideas. That's a good thing. The basis of a healthy debate is that a defense is raised of a tenable idea. With your approach, we could be arguing over literally anything, no matter how...

So do Darwinists. So does every group of believers. Are you going to defend every idea? Therefore you're going to defend the idea that the Earth is flat? You're not making much sense. Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

:AMR: Why?