Search results

I’m not trying to be evasive, but I need to know what part you don’t understand about what I said.

Again, you judge based on your own opinions. My opinions are just as valid, if that’s what we’re going by. But it’s not. Eventually truth will prevail, just like it did on the Russia collusion thing. Why are your standards so tight against the audit, when so loose regarding bearing false...

Explain what?

Then you agree that it is Jesus’ death that will result in all people arising from the dead?

I provided evidence. You rejected it. If you are the arbiter of evidence for American elections, then we’re in big trouble. Fortunately, you aren’t. But you can’t anymore say there is no evidence, at least not truthfully. But you don’t seem to care about truth, based on your news sources.

Paul’s words fit the Genesis narrative. Jesus supported it. Why go looking for a different interpretation, except that you don’t believe the three witnesses.

Once again, the leftist projects his inability to stay on a topic when he can’t refute it, onto the conservative. Just because I don’t have the best copies of the evidence doesn’t mean the evidence doesn’t exist in its proper form. If that’s something you’re unable to comprehend, I have a hard...

You’re denying the power of Jesus Christ’s death to raise all people from the dead.

I agree that your lunacy should be put to bed, but you did ask for evidence, which you chose to ignore, when provided. You have no answer to the evidence as provided, because it is evidence. There’s some question about what the evidence means, but your narrative has been that there is NO...

If the wages of sin is death, how would one know if someone has had their sins paid for? Wouldn’t it be that he was resurrected—saved out of death? So then, tell me who is NOT going to be resurrected? Please cite verses.

Hello? Anyone in there? Is Arthur Troll just moving on to another bridge, now that he can’t handwave his false narrative around?

Translation: “We don’t have it, and we know we’re about to go to jail, so we’ll pretend to be offended.”

Evidence: I can’t tell what the filenames mean, but there are a couple words I can read: “databases”, which is the name of the folder, and “adjudicableballotstore” with the date of the election.

He should be run out of town in disgrace.

Actually, files were deleted. The audit director said he didn’t know if they were files that weren’t supposed to be deleted or not. If the board of supervisors felt they were available from somewhere else, they could have said that. Instead they said they wouldn’t be cooperating with the audit...

Maybe it’s because she can’t understand the dialect??

According to your less-than-trustworthy sources, something I already pointed out to you, but you ignore anything that doesn’t fit your narrative.

You mean your link is fake news, as I showed to Brain. The files had to be “recovered”, according to your link. You don’t “recover” files that weren’t hidden or deleted.

There’s no amount time that would suffice, so I can see why you’d say that.

Based on what you’ve read from your fact checkers? You have no idea what “farce” even means, Brain.