Search results

Rich republicans will not give a dime to the poor but they think they please God by confiscating unfair amounts of funds from working Americans to augment trillions of un-backed printed dollars to throw at anything in hopes that will solve who knows what...

Doesn't mean that the Hank Aaron claim is true.

Rich republicans think the rest of the country can afford to live in poverty all the time. That's why they have opposed every program to help the poor that has ever been brought into existence. Rich republicans also think that the rest of the country, and the whole world for that matter, can...

Past and present, but coal for example is on the decline and nothing can stop that. Fusion energy is on the horizon. It's not mere speculation or wishful thinking, it's in the works right now. There's also hydrogen and battery technology that is advancing by the day. In due time.

Fossil fuels are the fuels of the past. Alternative, renewable, "green" sources of energy are the fuels of the future. That's called progress. I know you reactionaries hate change so much that you hate it even if it's change for the better, but it's coming whether you like it or not.

Gee, I wonder what was going on a year ago that caused gas prices to be lower than they are now? Oh, right, there was a shutdown due to the pandemic. I forgot. Gas prices do tend to go down when most people aren't traveling much, and then they go back up when the economy is active...

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/post-election-audits-are-normal-whats-happening-in-arizona-is-anything-but/

So you're just claiming there was massive vote fraud without any convincing evidence for massive vote fraud? Got it.

Well, whaddaya know? It turns out that rebuilding the nation's infrastructure costs a lot of money! Who would have guessed?

I take it as a given that voter fraud occurs in every election and on both sides. The question here is, Was there enough voter fraud to sway the election? No, there was not, and if you lot had any sufficient evidence to the contrary, those judges would have ruled differently.

A bankrupted Federal Reserve? Trump has his full share of blame in that with his record deficits. And God forbid Biden should have our infrastructure rebuilt and do what Trump promised to do when he ran in 2016, but never bothered to do anything about while he was president.

Indeed, there is so much evidence of voter fraud that every conservative judge has dismissed it with "No standing."

No, those polls weren't flawed. Hillary won the popular vote by ~3 million, so the polls were accurate in that sense. The only reason Trump won in 2016 was because black voters and Bernie Sanders supporters in several states that normally vote Democrat didn't show up to vote for Hillary. There...

Meanwhile, Sidney Powell continues to claim that "no reasonable person" would believe her claims of election fraud: Kraken lawyer Sidney Powell admitted in a filing in federal court that “no reasonable person would conclude that [her] statements were truly statements of fact.” Powell made the...

Of course there was more absentee ballots cast in 2020. In case you didn't notice, there was a pandemic going on.

If that's true, then the Navy pilots are utterly clueless and the radar data is false and no one in military or political leadership has any clue what they are talking about regarding this issue.

Right back at you! If you really "know for a fact that democrats stole the election by fraud," then you're going to have to explain how it was that public opinion polls taken before the election by the conservative Rasmussen Reports and Fox News showed Biden leading Trump. In fact, every...

I'm sorry, but anyone who thinks Trump actually won the 2020 election is just full-on delusional. If you really "know for a fact that democrats stole the election by fraud," then you're going to have to explain to me how it was that public opinion polls taken before the election by the...

Not at all. I'm simply a fan. Ask the ones on this thread who are casting aspersions what the extraterrestrial hypothesis has to do with their religious beliefs. It seems to be the entire basis of their objection to the mere suggestion that there might be ETs. Personally, I guess it's more...

Yes, I "just doubled down" on "no reason to dogmatically assume." Of course, you may have a reason to make dogmatic assumptions on this (or any) issue if your religious beliefs require you to. Mine don't.