Search results

Allow me to break down my comment for you wrong wrong right One out of three isn't that bad.

One out of three isn't that bad.

I've read tigger's post arguing that the proper translation is "thy throne is God" or "thy throne is from God" and even the trinitarians of the NLT believe this is a likely translation. But, I believe it is much easier to simply read the following verse which you omitted even though it was part...

"lifted-up" refers to his method of death. This is explicitly stated by John 12:33.

"’Tis myst’ry all: th’ Immortal dies: Who can explore His strange design? In vain the firstborn seraph tries To sound the depths of love divine. ’Tis mercy all! Let earth adore, Let angel minds inquire no more." It's been known for quite some time that this is a logical inconsistency. No where...

Do you believe in cockatrices and unicorns? Do you travel with a rooster for protection? Have you ever bothered to read the preface to the KJV?

Well, at least you agree that there is a controversy over the passage although you haven't made a decision about the passage yourself. I embrace the entire Bible, intact, in the original manuscripts.

So, you don't believe Jesus died?

Well then, the human Jesus can partner with God, just like the human Jesus died.

But you believe that he is human as well, right? Or do you believe Jesus is not and never was human?

Since you asked like you don't know,

Sorry to hear that you love the CCP.

OK. Now I'm curious. Johannine comma. Was it in the original manuscript or not?

Most definitely. Even a mild study of history will demonstrate that the majority text is heavily influenced by the Imperial Roman Church. And if you're talking about the Textus Receptus . . . that's far worse.

What you said is a paradox. The majority text is the result of the Roman Imperial Church.

You're still projecting.

You're projecting. . .

You haven’t shown it once. It’s nothing but your eisegesis.

And all this hatred over my saying that Jesus is not God - something you have yet to show in the Bible.

Actually it is called begging the question. Yes. That is a possibility. However, since Jesus usually didn't talk in the third person about himself and talking about oneself in the third person is usually a symptom of insanity, I would say the ball is in your court - not mine. I didn't ask a...