The problem is that 1) it's no longer the woman's DNA, and 2) we're talking about a person, not property, so trying to use the analogy in that way doesn't work.
It's a person, therefore it's wrong to intentionally kill him or her. NO EXCEPTIONS.
It would have felt better as a human being if the law punished rapists by executing them, because he wouldn't have even considered raping the girl in the first place.
AMEN!
You have it backwards. People need to face the consequences of their actions. You want to remove the consequences. The...
Calling Jesus' words garbage now? Yeah, you've worn out your welcome at this point. Good bye.
No, you didn't. You merely made an assertion that has been addressed multiple times, and all you have in response is to repeat your claims as if it makes a difference.
False
It teaches many...
Begging the question is a fallacy.
Why do you assume that I'm the one that can't understand facts, when you refuse to consider Jesus' own words?
KURIOS is the Greek word for Lord. Fact.
KURIOS is used in reference to BOTH God AND Jesus. Fact
Using "LORD" (small uppercase) is an indication...
Yes, I agree. But at least you're not intentionally murdering the child!
Indeed. Yet, many ectopic pregnancies resolve themselves.
https://www.childpredators.com/the-child-predator-report/
Saying it doesn't make it so.
An innocent baby is hardly dangerous.
None of this gives you the right to kill an innocent child if the child needs to be removed from the mother's body to prevent her from dying.
Again, this doesn't give anyone the right to INTENTIONALLY kill the innocent...
The only reason God has enemies at all is because He made them to BE His enemies, according to your theology.
Your theology makes God out to be the arsonist AND the fireman who saves you from the fire consuming your home, INHERENTLY UNJUST!
Baseless claim.
Why do you think that people in heaven are concerned with what's going on Earthside, when there are so many people to interact with, not to mention their Creator?
No one, not even the Bible, says there won't be pain in Heaven.
Revelation 21:4 says nothing of the sort...
False.
Wrong.
We know the true God. You don't.
Yup. What is God supposed to do, without being unjust, to those who reject Him and refuse to live with Him?
Jesus called that commandment "MY commandment." Not "My Father's commandment."
Indeed.
Eternity is a lot, lot longer than that...
Not even close.
Not what Proverbs was talking about.
What's "Harmageddon"? Some sort of band name?
Nope.
Yes. And?
Which, again, doesn't mean that they will cease to exist. Is all you have your plain repetitious nonsense?
I was referring to the New Testament, where God is called Lord... in GREEK, where the Tetragrammaton isn't used.
Saying it doesn't make it so.
I don't think God cares too much, since it's still referring to Him regardless.
You keep bringing it up, yet no one has disputed it, kj.
Do you...
Nope. There will be some who will not see death.
False.
Scripture is clear that there is.
False.
Again, I ask: Where does God put for eternity those who reject Him and don't want to live with Him?
Indeed. Yet you think He is unjust for removing from His presence those who reject Him...